| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The 2nd Amendment to our constitution; Some thoughts | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 13 2013, 01:42 AM (717 Views) | |
| Pat | Mar 13 2013, 01:42 AM Post #1 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
America was founded on PRINCIPLES of human rights that are aligned with the laws of nature. The second amendment is derived from the principle that every creature has the right to defend itself. If some guy walked in and started punching you in the face, no one would argue that you had the right to hit back. If he came in with a bat, no one would argue that you could pick up a chair or table leg, and would have every right to do so. But if he came in with a gun, then anti gun people are arguing that you no longer have that right. That you must become a helpless victim. That would be like saying you must tie your hands behind your back when the guy comes in to punch you, or hit you with a bat. You no longer have the right to defend yourself. "But why do you need an assault rifle"?? This PRINCIPLE is not affected by time or technology, and it is self evident that it should apply to whatever the weapons of the day might be. Here is hoping that we never need our modern rifles for anything but 3 gun competitions and target practice, but in America we recognize the difference between having and not needing, and needing and not having. You see in England, they have the royalty, who are sovereign, and have all the rights, and the subjects get to live their lives as long as they obey the rules that the sovereignty gives them. In America, we the people are the sovereigns, and we have allowed government the authority to handle certain things, all designed to protect our liberty. We don’t like the idea of being subjects. We are a nation of heroes and free thinkers, and the idea of leaving our people helpless to criminals or tyrants is offensive to us. In England or Canada they take comfort in the fact that, even though their rape, robbery, and murder statistics are comparable, gun related deaths are low. In America, we would rather think that some of those people who would be helpless victims in Europe or Canada, would have a chance to defend themselves here. Anti gun people bring up the statistics of gun related deaths in America compared to England or Canada. The statistics have nothing to do with the PRINCIPLE, but let’s examine them for a moment. When you consider that there are around 52 million households owning 200 to 300 million guns, the number is amazingly low. It means that over 50 million gun owners (a number that dwarfs every other country in the world) in America harm no one. That means that the good guys outnumber the bad guys by a ridiculous margin, and in an increasingly dangerous world, only a fool would want to disarm the good guys. Statistics bring little comfort to those good people who are so terribly affected by tragic events like in Connecticut recently. The startling reminder that there are monsters in the world compels them to want to do something. What they really want to do is outlaw the monsters, but they know that monsters do not obey laws. Encouraged by government and media, (who have a different agenda) they fall for the propaganda and lash out at the tool, as though it was the monster. They think that passing laws against them is going to somehow make 300 million guns unavailable to the monsters. Here is a reminder. Monsters don’t obey laws. You cannot un-invent guns, and even if it was a good idea (which it is not) we have two porous borders, thousands of miles of shoreline and 300 million guns already in the country. It would be impossible to make guns unavailable to those who would do harm. So the only choice available to us is whether we understand the PRINCIPLES, and allow good Americans to be armed against criminals and tyrants, or you leave them helpless victims….like they do in England and Canada. They say that people who want to keep weapons as a defense to tyranny are paranoid, and that it can never happen here. Really??? TSA, The Patriot Act, FISA, the NDAA,…if the government was not defecating on the Constitution every other week perhaps we could talk (no…we still couldn’t), and as they lead us into the very real possibility of a financial collapse, I don’t think this is a very good time to consider giving up our weapons. If you look at gun and ammo sales statistics from the last few weeks, I’d say a good portion of America agrees with me. One wonders at the timing of this anti-gun barrage. Perhaps Congress knows more than they are saying about our financial situation and think that maybe we might hold a grudge against those who let it happen. Much talk and emotion gets expressed on this board and quite a bit about gun control and the 2nd amendment. I know others here disagree with the above, which is fine. And I'm well aware of the anti private gun ownership agenda of some in congress and our president-- despite their media comment to the contrary. I'm also aware that this same government passed draconian anti drug laws. has prosecuted a drug war for going on fifty years, and there has been no drop in the availability of drugs. In fact the amount readily available in minutes on any street on the continent is astounding. The anti drug people and our government have failed to gain any headwaters yet anti gun people and the government think passing anti gun laws will end private ownership of guns.Instead like drugs...their availability to criminal elements will increase, while law abiding Americans in many cases will disarm themselves. Leaving them prey for the bad guys. In my opinion, the anti private gun ownership people while believing they are doing the country a great service, are instead putting us all at risk. Think about it, use logic and reason as you address the subject. The founding fathers were not wrong nor is the constitution out of touch with today;s world. Instead it is nearly mystical in the way to performs as formed with each passing generation. When older prejudices and bad amendments were passed, the wisdom of Americans prevailed and amended the document. The vast majority of Americans believe that in this area, the document is dead on. |
![]() |
|
| jackd | Mar 13 2013, 01:57 AM Post #2 |
Sr. Member
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A very nice self-serving essay by the NRAand Japan, Sweden, Singapore, Malaysia, France, Belgium, Danemark, Findland, Greece, Germany, Australia, Italy, Netherland, Norway, Spain, Portugal, and 65 other civilized nation [/color] where the number of deaths by gun is far, very far from what is seen in the all mighty U.S. of A. Simple logic should lead to logical conclusions: more guns = more deaths by gun. I know it is hard to swallow... |
![]() |
|
| Sea Dog | Mar 13 2013, 02:18 AM Post #3 |
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
jackd. The gun nut culture is so deeply ingrained into a certain segment of the American population that to try to interject common sense is futile. Rational persons realize that they cannot stand off the worlds greatest military with a hodge podge of hand held weapons. To the gun nuts and anti government types, no problem! |
![]() |
|
| Banandangees | Mar 13 2013, 02:24 AM Post #4 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What % of the male population in Canada own a firearm? Just curious. |
![]() |
|
| Neutral | Mar 13 2013, 02:25 AM Post #5 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So says two who can't come to our country half their lives. LOL |
![]() |
|
| Banandangees | Mar 13 2013, 02:35 AM Post #6 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Let me help:
Edited by Banandangees, Mar 13 2013, 02:36 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| RTD | Mar 13 2013, 02:37 AM Post #7 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I own 7 myself... |
![]() |
|
| Banandangees | Mar 13 2013, 02:46 AM Post #8 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You must be one Canadian who belongs to the gun nut culture Sea refers to. ![]() Some own guns, some own fishing poles. Sea was a fisherman. Edited by Banandangees, Mar 13 2013, 02:46 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Pat | Mar 13 2013, 02:59 AM Post #9 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks for adding the Canadian gun ownership statistics Ban. I already knew that a substantial number of Canadian friends and family support my views on this, and own firearms. I think it is both naive and unsettling to read others label them as gun nuts. All are upstanding successful members of the community. |
![]() |
|
| Neutral | Mar 13 2013, 03:00 AM Post #10 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's the problem with this entire 2nd amendment debate, the anti gun crowd wants to take guns away from upstanding citizens. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z3.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)





3:07 AM Jul 12
