Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Rand Paul
Topic Started: Mar 8 2013, 02:58 AM (988 Views)
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Pat
Mar 9 2013, 02:50 AM
tomdrobin
Mar 8 2013, 02:11 PM
I don't agree with Rand Paul politically, but calling him an a--shole is a bit extreme. I respected his doing the old fashioned filibuster.
Yep and he made the president admit Holder was wrong. A successful use of the protocol that helped stem the erosion of our constitution. How that is a failure or he is an asshole is beyond me. I know that many disagree with his politics, but in Huffington yesterday, the question was raised as to why the democrats didn't join him. I guess they only know the reason behind that one. Maybe a democrat here can explain that one.
Please give us a link to where the President "admitted Holder was wrong." This is particularly important since both answers were essentially the same.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Oh Christ Colo, do you think Holder answered without consulting Obie. Get real for once.

Actually I think Carney answered and maybe you think he just spouts off on his own without consultation with his boss. :tongue:
Edited by Neutral, Mar 9 2013, 02:58 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

colo_crawdad
Mar 9 2013, 02:55 AM
Pat
Mar 9 2013, 02:50 AM
tomdrobin
Mar 8 2013, 02:11 PM
I don't agree with Rand Paul politically, but calling him an a--shole is a bit extreme. I respected his doing the old fashioned filibuster.
Yep and he made the president admit Holder was wrong. A successful use of the protocol that helped stem the erosion of our constitution. How that is a failure or he is an asshole is beyond me. I know that many disagree with his politics, but in Huffington yesterday, the question was raised as to why the democrats didn't join him. I guess they only know the reason behind that one. Maybe a democrat here can explain that one.
Please give us a link to where the President "admitted Holder was wrong." This is particularly important since both answers were essentially the same.
Colo they cannot prove something that did not happen so look for Pat to ignore your post
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pat
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
colo_crawdad
Mar 9 2013, 02:55 AM
Pat
Mar 9 2013, 02:50 AM
tomdrobin
Mar 8 2013, 02:11 PM
I don't agree with Rand Paul politically, but calling him an a--shole is a bit extreme. I respected his doing the old fashioned filibuster.
Yep and he made the president admit Holder was wrong. A successful use of the protocol that helped stem the erosion of our constitution. How that is a failure or he is an asshole is beyond me. I know that many disagree with his politics, but in Huffington yesterday, the question was raised as to why the democrats didn't join him. I guess they only know the reason behind that one. Maybe a democrat here can explain that one.
Please give us a link to where the President "admitted Holder was wrong." This is particularly important since both answers were essentially the same.
Oh Christ Colo., are we going there again? I was using a summation of the facts and bet everybody here agrees with it. We all listened or read Holder's and the justice departments summation on this a few days ago. Do you think such a policy originated in a vacuum absent the president?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Neutral
Mar 9 2013, 02:57 AM
Oh Christ Colo, do you think Holder answered without consulting Obie. Get real for once.
IOW, other than dependence of Carnac the Magnificent, there is absolutely no credible evidence that Rand "made the president admit Holder was wrong?" Frankly;u, while I am not sure what to call the game you are apparently playing, Neutral, I am rapidly getting sick and tired of it.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Pat
Mar 9 2013, 02:59 AM
colo_crawdad
Mar 9 2013, 02:55 AM
Pat
Mar 9 2013, 02:50 AM
tomdrobin
Mar 8 2013, 02:11 PM
I don't agree with Rand Paul politically, but calling him an a--shole is a bit extreme. I respected his doing the old fashioned filibuster.
Yep and he made the president admit Holder was wrong. A successful use of the protocol that helped stem the erosion of our constitution. How that is a failure or he is an asshole is beyond me. I know that many disagree with his politics, but in Huffington yesterday, the question was raised as to why the democrats didn't join him. I guess they only know the reason behind that one. Maybe a democrat here can explain that one.
Please give us a link to where the President "admitted Holder was wrong." This is particularly important since both answers were essentially the same.
Oh Christ Colo., are we going there again? I was using a summation of the facts and bet everybody here agrees with it. We all listened or read Holder's and the justice departments summation on this a few days ago. Do you think such a policy originated in a vacuum absent the president?
"Summation of facts" you mean you made schit up, just be clear
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Colo begins one of his ignorant childish games again. What a waste of bandwidth.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Neutral
Mar 9 2013, 03:01 AM
Colo begins one of his ignorant childish games again. What a waste of bandwidth.
This from the King of wasted bandwidth popcorn
Quote Post Goto Top
 
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
I am betting that both Neutral and Pat actually think "Christ is on their side in this argument. Either that or the both blasphemed Christ's name. But if one is reduced to that, one doe3s what one thinks he/she can. An Neutral is prone to say, read my signature.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Deflection is another of your games Colo.
Why not deal with what was said instead of taking one word and trying to divert.
IOW, quit with your ignorant childish game.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis