| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Australian minimum wage $16.43 in US dollars | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 22 2013, 11:54 PM (1,071 Views) | |
| colo_crawdad | Feb 23 2013, 02:21 AM Post #21 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I m wondering to what Neutral attributes Australia's low unemployment rate? |
![]() |
|
| Pat | Feb 23 2013, 02:29 AM Post #22 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Who knows, all i know is what I have been proposing might seem radical to some, but it works. Shouldn't that be the reason behind all monetary policy in our own lives and that of society? I'm telling you, this is not about politics or philosophy, it is a matter of using the physics as applied to what i noted above. I don't know how my TV works, but it works, that's all that matters to me. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Feb 23 2013, 02:34 AM Post #23 |
|
Deleted User
|
The simple answer is what newt says, more wages less people working. Trouble is that does not appear to be the case in practice. In BC where we have a highly unionized work force, we also have a low unemployment rate. I remember being on strike many years ago and a store owner complained about picketing the companies premises which was next door to his store. we suggested if he objected so much he should put up a big sign saying "no unionized people welcome here" and see how long he stayed in business. The fact of the matter was a huge percentage of his customers were unionized employees at the company next door. There is also the point that people who are paid a decent wage may be more productive and loyal to their company which amounts to the same thing. |
|
|
| Neutral | Feb 23 2013, 02:53 AM Post #24 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
As I said earlier, why not raise it to $50 an hour then if it works so well? |
![]() |
|
| Pat | Feb 23 2013, 04:56 AM Post #25 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You don't need a union middleman Teleco if common sense is nationwide. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Feb 23 2013, 07:38 AM Post #26 |
|
Deleted User
|
Not if a company pays a fair wage for services rendered. Trouble is not all of them do. |
|
|
| Berton | Feb 23 2013, 01:21 PM Post #27 |
![]()
Thunder Fan
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Why not raise it to $1,000 then? Does the cost of the product these workers are making going to go up? |
![]() |
|
| tomdrobin | Feb 23 2013, 01:24 PM Post #28 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Now your being ridiculous. Minimum wage employers could absorb the $60 a week more for a full time employee out of profits. But, requiring them to pay another $1500 or so a week would fulfill your layoff prophecy. It's like the rights phony tax arguments. Sure if you tax enough you depress economic activity. But, to apply that across the board to any tax increase is disingenuous. |
![]() |
|
| Berton | Feb 23 2013, 01:26 PM Post #29 |
![]()
Thunder Fan
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No, it is the obvious extension of your policy. |
![]() |
|
| tomdrobin | Feb 23 2013, 01:53 PM Post #30 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Are you nuckin futts? It's not an obvious extension, it's a ridiculous extension offered up by someone who has no valid argument against increasing it to $9 an hour. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z3.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)





3:13 AM Jul 12
