| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Merkel Urges Tax Cuts to Boost German Economy | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 19 2012, 08:28 AM (457 Views) | |
| Berton | Oct 19 2012, 08:28 AM Post #1 |
![]()
Thunder Fan
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Merkel Urges Tax Cuts to Boost German Economy Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Tuesday Germany needs to stimulate domestic economic demand and urged opposition parties to stop blocking proposed tax cuts in the upper house of Parliament. Merkel told business leaders Germany should end the automatic progression of workers into ever higher tax brackets due to inflation, which siphons more than 20 billion euros ($26 billion) out of the economy each year. She also renewed her calls for cuts in pension contributions as another way to boost purchasing power. "Growth in Germany can at the moment be stimulated by an increase in domestic demand more than anything else," she said. Germany has come under pressure to boost domestic demand to relieve pressure on the euro zone's struggling periphery during the sovereign debt crisis. Merkel has also encouraged German firms to give their employees higher wage increases this year. The battle over whether to cut taxes is also shaping up into a key issue ahead of next year's federal election, where Merkel will be seeking a third term. In Germany's tax code, "bracket creep" generates billions of euros in revenues for the treasury because tax brackets are not adjusted for inflation. The system has not been changed since 1958 and the state took in an extra 76 billion euros from 2005 to 2010. It has been taking in about 22 billion euros a year since 2010. Merkel's government wants to reform the tax code to reduce the impact of "bracket creep," but the opposition has blocked that in the upper house Bundesrat, where Merkel's center-right coalition government has no majority. In May, the Bundesrat blocked 6 billion euros worth of tax cuts that would have addressed this issue. The opposition Social Democrats said it was irresponsible to cut taxes at a time of budget consolidation. Even though Germany long seemed immune to the slowdown gripping much of Europe due to the euro zone debt crisis, its economy has started to cool appreciably this year. Growth in Germany dropped to 0.3 percent in the second quarter from 0.5 percent in the first. The government is expected to cut on Wednesday its expectations for growth next year to 1 percent from a previous 1.6 percent. Merkel said there was also a need to reform the surcharge levied on consumers to pay for renewable power after Germany's four high-voltage network operators announced on Monday that it would rise 47 percent to 5.3 cents per kilowatt/hour next year. Merkel said it was not right that so many companies were exempt from the surcharge, throwing her weight behind critics of the system who complain the exemptions are responsible for the planned steep increase from 3.6 cents per kilowatt/hour in 2012. "We've got to take another look at this and see if it was right to give so many corporate exemptions to companies that are not facing international competition," Merkel said. "Right now there are more companies exempted than are facing international competition." She said the Renewable Energy Act that has helped make Germany a world leader in renewable energy — getting 25 percent of its electricity from wind, solar, and biomass — needed to be reformed because of the sharply rising surcharge costs. "I see an urgent need to reform the Renewable Energy Act," she said. LINK |
![]() |
|
| Berton | Oct 19 2012, 12:36 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Thunder Fan
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
|
| Berton | Oct 19 2012, 10:08 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Thunder Fan
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No comment from the tax and spend crowd? |
![]() |
|
| Berton | Oct 20 2012, 11:20 AM Post #4 |
![]()
Thunder Fan
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
|
| tomdrobin | Oct 20 2012, 12:13 PM Post #5 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Now that's cheap energy, around here it is 12-15 cents per kwhr. |
![]() |
|
| Banandangees | Oct 20 2012, 05:19 PM Post #6 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
hmm! Tax cuts to boost the economy. Is Merkel some kind of nut? Brew's not going to like this. |
![]() |
|
| Corky52 | Oct 20 2012, 05:26 PM Post #7 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It would appear that the proposed cuts in German taxes are aimed at the lower rather than the upper income taxpayers, consumption boosting cuts rather than investment boosting cuts. Should be interesting to see what the cino's have to say after doing an in-depth examination of the proposal.
|
![]() |
|
| Corky52 | Oct 20 2012, 05:38 PM Post #8 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Tom, I think the numbers quoted are the surcharge not the base rate, need to look further into this to be sure.
|
![]() |
|
| Banandangees | Oct 20 2012, 08:31 PM Post #9 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I would think tax cuts would affect ALL tax bracket levels (not just the lower income taxpayers) as "Bracket Creep" would apply to everyone except those in the very highest tax bracket as they can't "creep" any higher than the higest bracett. And consumption boosting tax cuts again would affect all; although, those who have more money to spend, more would benefit from a greater buying value. But, isn't that what you want, people with money spending it (putting it back into circulation.. stimulating business and employment)? |
![]() |
|
| Brewster | Oct 20 2012, 09:07 PM Post #10 |
![]()
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You (and a bunch of others) weren't paying attention, apparently. And once again reading into her actions only what you want to see. She's cutting taxes across the board while increasing the surcharge on energy for high end users. What is the outcome? She's putting more money into the pockets of the lower and middle class to increase consumption of goods while increasing what the rich and corporations pay. Overall, there should be little difference in her budget balance. In addition, her policies will encourage big energy users to find ways to conserve energy and reduce greenhouse gases to help reduce Global Warming. Smart lady - too bad we can't convince our leaders in North America to do the same. Maybe it's time to point out what she's done to Harper, who might listen. Maybe Obama would, but I know Romney & friends will never get it. Edited by Brewster, Oct 20 2012, 09:28 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2






![]](http://z3.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)




3:23 AM Jul 12
