Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
The debate
Topic Started: Oct 17 2012, 09:32 AM (1,955 Views)
Pat
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
colo_crawdad
Oct 17 2012, 10:15 PM
Banandangees
Oct 17 2012, 08:18 PM
The President said it was an act of terror before he said it was a demonstration gone awry and before he changed it back to an act of terror and before the administration said someday they will find the real truth...... then, they will make sure that the American people will be the first to know. (Like we don't know already) :bounce:

Perhaps Mitt Romney's either being uniformed, misinformed, or just lying is something about which to laugh. The mistake Romney made was not to say that the President did not call it a
"preplanned terrorist attack."
That would have been a true statement. But, to say the President did not6 call it an "act of terror," appeared to be from either misinformation or just lying. That6 kind of reckless statement by a Presidential candidate is simply scary.\

BTW, the act occurring during a demonstration does not suggest it was not "an act of terror" or terrorism." For the Administration to wait until it actually had all of the facts, to call it a preplanned act of terror just demonstrates good judgement and restaurant -- the very opposite of what Mitt Romney demonstrated during the argument in the debate.
That was a miscue on Romney's part, but overall on the point he was making he was correct. The administration spent at least a week blaming it on a video that caused a crowd reaction resulting in the four deaths. This was a blatant attempt at a coverup Colo, you know it, I know it, and virtually everyone in the nation knows it. So to say Romney lost the election on a miscue, I think you are overreacting and reaching on that conclusion.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
It was only a miscue as Romney used one word. Obie was not speaking of Benghazi in the Rose Garden and his and especially Rice's later statements prove it.
Crowley backed Obie up of course but she said AFTER the debate she was wrong.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pat
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Crowley was a blatant, outspoken ally last night. this is all over the media, nothing more than a liberal shill.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Well, she said before the debate she was NOT going to abide by the rules of the committee so we had prior knowledge. I do not understand why the Reps agree to these libs. This is the third debate now that the Dem has gotten more time too.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pat
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
I doubt in the future, that you will see any conservative group agree to using these liberal media hacks again.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
One would hope not.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Berton
Member Avatar
Thunder Fan
[ * ]
colo_crawdad
Oct 17 2012, 11:41 PM
As someone posted on another forum: "Two things are obvious. The right on this board were not gracious winners and now they are very poor losers. "

True three and just as true here.

It is quite obvious that either the President lied about saying the attack was by terrorists in the Rose Garden or he and his administration lied for over two weeks saying it happened because of a film including a speech at the UN. You can have it one way or the other but you can not have it both ways. In one or the other Obama lied. That mistake may well have cost him the debate,and possibly the Presidency, by itself.



Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
colo_crawdad
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
The whining from the Right should be surprising. It isn't. It just supports the observation about how poor winners and losers the Us Right is. I am disappointed in the US. Right. I understood their ungracious attitude when Romney won, but the whining when he lost surprises even me. The whining does provide support for just how badly the US Right thinks Romney lost the debate.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Its funny how when the President wins a debate, it was the moderators fault. Romney tried to interrupt several times last night as well. I saw her call both of them on it.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Neutral
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
You ignore the facts, she interrupted Romney three times more, she helped Obie with a question and she gave Obie more than three minutes more.
Now those are facts, Crowley was not fair. Even she backed off her statement about Benghazi.
Why you libs keep ignoring the facts I don't know but if you think that helped Obie you are wrong. Romney won for sure on the economy and today he is winning on the Libya lies of this administration.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis