Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
By the time this Iran thing has hit the fan.....
Topic Started: Feb 22 2012, 08:58 PM (1,473 Views)
Thumper
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Maybe Chris wants to join the USAF and go over there and bomb hell outta Iran? LOL
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
tomdrobin
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Well if Iran gets the bomb, then Saudi Arabia will be next. Now, if they get a three way going between them and Isreal, the middle east "problem" would disappear. Albiet it wouldn't be inhabitable for a while.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mountainrivers
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
tomdrobin
Feb 22 2012, 10:48 PM
Well if Iran gets the bomb, then Saudi Arabia will be next. Now, if they get a three way going between them and Isreal, the middle east "problem" would disappear. Albiet it wouldn't be inhabitable for a while.
I've seen several righties on this board and others suggest that "we" should make a glass parking lot out of Iran. Ignorance abounds among some.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Thumper
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
tomdrobin
Feb 22 2012, 10:48 PM
Well if Iran gets the bomb, then Saudi Arabia will be next. Now, if they get a three way going between them and Isreal, the middle east "problem" would disappear. Albiet it wouldn't be inhabitable for a while.
Now you are talking.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Thumper
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Mountainrivers
Feb 22 2012, 11:04 PM
tomdrobin
Feb 22 2012, 10:48 PM
Well if Iran gets the bomb, then Saudi Arabia will be next. Now, if they get a three way going between them and Isreal, the middle east "problem" would disappear. Albiet it wouldn't be inhabitable for a while.
I've seen several righties on this board and others suggest that "we" should make a glass parking lot out of Iran. Ignorance abounds among some.
Bravado BS coming from ignorant minds.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
tomdrobin
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Mountainrivers
Feb 22 2012, 11:04 PM
tomdrobin
Feb 22 2012, 10:48 PM
Well if Iran gets the bomb, then Saudi Arabia will be next. Now, if they get a three way going between them and Isreal, the middle east "problem" would disappear. Albiet it wouldn't be inhabitable for a while.
I've seen several righties on this board and others suggest that "we" should make a glass parking lot out of Iran. Ignorance abounds among some.
Are you calling me a rightie Neal? Jim won't like that. :teeth:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mountainrivers
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
tomdrobin
Feb 22 2012, 11:11 PM
Mountainrivers
Feb 22 2012, 11:04 PM
tomdrobin
Feb 22 2012, 10:48 PM
Well if Iran gets the bomb, then Saudi Arabia will be next. Now, if they get a three way going between them and Isreal, the middle east "problem" would disappear. Albiet it wouldn't be inhabitable for a while.
I've seen several righties on this board and others suggest that "we" should make a glass parking lot out of Iran. Ignorance abounds among some.
Are you calling me a rightie Neal? Jim won't like that. :teeth:
Not at all, Tom. I didn't take your post as advocating for nuking Iran. Just an observation about if they got into a war. I long ago stopped caring what miller thought.
Edited by Mountainrivers, Feb 22 2012, 11:16 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Chris
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
rivers "I didn't say I was for any such thing. I asked a question. Quit putting words in my mouth."

Questions carriy implications. And the following is heavily laden with approval: "Why not let them have their bomb? We let Russian, China, India, Pakistan, England, France, Israel, North Korea and ourselves have the bomb. Are you willing to go to war to stop them from getting one? And if you are, are you willing to stay in Iran militarily forever to make sure they don't ever get one?"

But I stand corrected if you're against it, or if you're noninterventionist now like Paul.



"Life is full of risks. I don't feel threatened by Iran having nukes. That's for the paranoid naysayers."

Why not keystone then as originally planned?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mountainrivers
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Chris
Feb 22 2012, 11:32 PM
rivers "I didn't say I was for any such thing. I asked a question. Quit putting words in my mouth."

Questions carriy implications. And the following is heavily laden with approval: "Why not let them have their bomb? We let Russian, China, India, Pakistan, England, France, Israel, North Korea and ourselves have the bomb. Are you willing to go to war to stop them from getting one? And if you are, are you willing to stay in Iran militarily forever to make sure they don't ever get one?"

But I stand corrected if you're against it, or if you're noninterventionist now like Paul.



"Life is full of risks. I don't feel threatened by Iran having nukes. That's for the paranoid naysayers."

Why not keystone then as originally planned?
I'm for non-intervention. I feel threatened by Keystone.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Chris
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Mountainrivers
Feb 22 2012, 11:04 PM
tomdrobin
Feb 22 2012, 10:48 PM
Well if Iran gets the bomb, then Saudi Arabia will be next. Now, if they get a three way going between them and Isreal, the middle east "problem" would disappear. Albiet it wouldn't be inhabitable for a while.
I've seen several righties on this board and others suggest that "we" should make a glass parking lot out of Iran. Ignorance abounds among some.
Well that's rather senseless. I mean if you're going to conquer someone, for taking their land or resources or people as slaves, or for spreading democracy, or the latest humanitarian reasons, you can't do that annihilating them.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis