| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Is British Columbia the New Bakken?; Will export LNG to Asia | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 22 2012, 09:02 AM (489 Views) | |
| jackd | Feb 23 2012, 01:00 AM Post #11 |
Sr. Member
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
looks like the Kitimat projet will very soon get the go-ahead. KITIMAT Edited by jackd, Feb 23 2012, 01:01 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Mountainrivers | Feb 23 2012, 01:06 AM Post #12 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Do the First Nation tribes have a say in it Jack? And are they talking about an oil pipeline or a gas pipeline? Edited by Mountainrivers, Feb 23 2012, 01:06 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| jackd | Feb 23 2012, 01:11 AM Post #13 |
Sr. Member
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't know if the first nation have accepted or not.... It would be a natural gas pipaline. |
![]() |
|
| Mountainrivers | Feb 23 2012, 01:14 AM Post #14 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So, that wouldn't replace the Keystone pipeline, which will carry sludge from the oil sands? I understand there are already small pipelines carrying natural gas, so that wouldn't be new, only bigger. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Feb 23 2012, 02:06 AM Post #15 |
|
Deleted User
|
This one is different. The one proposed to carry oil is the contentious one. |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2





![]](http://z3.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



10:17 PM Jul 11
