Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Stamp price hike part of Postal Service plan to cut losses
Topic Started: Feb 19 2012, 09:21 AM (1,657 Views)
Jim Miller
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
I bet the government will do a much better job with our healthcare. :sarcasim:

Quote:
 
Stamp price hike part of Postal Service plan to cut losses


A nickel boost in the first-class stamp price to 50 cents is part of the U.S. Postal Service's latest plan to stop bleeding red ink.

The Postal Service released the 5-year business plan to Congress late Thursday in part to push Congress to pass legislation to help them get through ongoing financial woes. Due in large part to declining first-class mail volume, the service recorded a $3.3 billion loss in the final three months of last year, which is usually a profitable period.

The Postal Service says that, if nothing is done, it faces $18 billion in losses by 2015. Lawmakers have been working on different plans for months, but all of them have controversial aspects and are stalled.

The U.S. Postal Service's plan would save about $20 billion over the next five years, although it needs Congress to act to achieve about $10 billion in savings.

Nearly all the ideas in the five-year plan have been proposed before, except for the big first-class stamp boost. Raising the price of the stamp to 50 cents from 45 cents now could yield $1 billion a year in new revenue, according to the plan.

Among previously offered proposals, home delivery would be cut to five days a week from six, and thousands of post offices and mail processing plants would be closed. The service would slow the delivery of first class mail by a day.

The agency also proposes bypassing a federal law that requires that it to prefund retiree health care. It would also create a new health care plan for employees to be run by the Postal Service.

The plan would also reduce the number of employees by 155,000 by 2016, mostly through pushing some of the 283,000 eligible to retire.

Postal Service pleads for help as losses continue

"The plan we have developed requires a combination of aggressive cost reduction, rethinking the way we manage our healthcare costs, and comprehensive legislation to reform the business model of the Postal Service," said Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe.

However, most of the cost-cutting measures the Postal Service is pushing for are controversial, and have opponents in Congress and among employee unions.

The National Association of Letter Carriers vowed to study the new business plan but decried moves to cut Saturday delivery, downsize networks and slow delivery.

"Charging more for reduced service is not a rational plan for any business, including the U.S. Postal Service," said Fredric Rolando, president of the National Association of Letter Carriers.

The union also noted that almost all of the $3.3 billion in red ink the Postal Service recorded in the quarter resulted from the $3.1 billion owed to pre-fund future retiree health benefits. The union wants Congress to dispense with the 2006 mandate that required prefunding those benefits.

In December, the Postal Service announced a plan to shut up to 250 mail processing plants and cut 28,000 jobs nationwide, but later delayed the closures until May 15. The plan released Friday makes clear the Postal Service intends to push forward with proposed cuts if Congress doesn't act.

Postal Service policy consultant Alan Robinson noted that the new business plan includes an "aggressive schedule" for cutting employees and services, in his blog the Courier Express and Postal Observer.

The plan to cut mail facilities soon after the May 15 moratorium "represents a clear example of the Postal Service taking an action that will generate substantial political heat that in previous years it would have deferred," Robinson wrote.

As for when Congress might act, experts say they don't expect progress until March at the earliest.

"This is a dire situation, but it is not hopeless," said Sen. Tom Carper, a Delaware Democrat who runs the subcommittee that oversees the U.S. Postal Service. "We can save the Postal Service for future generations -- and without further burdening taxpayers -- if we act decisively and strategically."

The Postal Service is chartered as a government enterprise and its business model is supposed to be self-sufficient. But it has borrowed $12.9 billion from Treasury in recent years to stave off cash crunches.
LINK
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Postal rates are always rising. I do lots of mailing for our organization from Bellingham, Wa and it seems rates go up pretty much annually. Its the same in Canada.

Email is really cutting into postal services bottom line.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
retired
Member Avatar
Gold Star Member
[ * ]
We use very few stamps.The ones we do use are from last year and are forever. Gas prices rise along with the cost of equipment etc.
I consider the Postal Service a bargain.And I hope they keep Saturday service intact.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jim Miller
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
It may be a bargain, retired but your beloved government is running it into the ground.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
tomdrobin
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
I've always been very satisfied with the postal service, and think they do a good job for the money. While they are expected to not loose money, at the same time they have mandated service requirements by the government to areas that aren't profitable. Were it a business purely run for profit without government interference they would be profitable but service would disappear in some areas.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jim Miller
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
What areas would lose service? And do you have a link to that?
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Chris
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Under normal free market competition, where competitors look for new efficiencies in production and service, prices ought to be going down, not up.

Like retired I rarely use stamps, and am going to each utility service I use to see if I can go electronic in billing.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

You just answered your own question. Post Offices have become irrelevant to a large portion of the population, however they are still a requirement to a portion of the population who has no access to electronic services to replace it or areas where courier services won't go. The fact technology has made it a non profitable service does not mean it is not an essential service, so it has moved to one of those things that government is required to supply at a loss. At least until it is completely obsolete like horse & buggy manufacture.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mountainrivers
Member Avatar
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
[ * ]
Not to mention that the postal service is mandated in the constitution.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
retired
Member Avatar
Gold Star Member
[ * ]
As long as government is not footing the bill as i always have been told the service is a private entity and nobody use's anyway why should anyone care.
Now if is costing us taxpayers so much money then Congress will have to chop chop the service and let Sarah and Tom in Lone Montana start gittin their seed catalogs from UPS or FEDEX. Might cost a bit more but hey we all gotta buck up.
There are private courier services that can pick up the slack.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Website Traffic Analysis