| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| A year left: Obama running against history | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 7 2011, 01:29 PM (883 Views) | |
| Chris | Nov 11 2011, 01:51 AM Post #31 |
![]()
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Herbert's book on Quantum Reality was enough for a while! It really helped understanding what they're talking about. Back to "justified true belief". Went back an reread David Deutsche point about that. He was actually using it as a lead into criticizing justification by authority and then went on to fallibilism as what advances science. My use of justification would include both, with some based on what others say, but not in an authoritative way. What counts as justification, to me, is explanation that most elegantly and logically explains the facts, experts providing insights and perspectives, but accepted skeptically. I may post something on this later. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic » |






![]](http://z3.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



10:43 PM Jul 11
