| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Number Of Americans On Food Stamps; Another High Years After Recession's End | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 5 2011, 12:38 AM (871 Views) | |
| Banandangees | Nov 5 2011, 10:53 PM Post #11 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
"forced to pay...", that is the fact that many don't seem to understand, or want to understand. You can list SS and Medicare as an entitlement along side "food stamps" and welfare but the big difference is that an employee and his employer have been forced to pay into the fund by government. If it's to be called an entitlement it certainly should be defined as a paid in, required entitlement. If the government programs are not run properly or the funds mismanaged, it's not the fault of those who were forced to pay into such programs. Why is it so hard to understand the significance of debt..... what the ramifications of debt over time are? We are seeing it played out in living color in Europe on TV every day. Debt is incurred by spending more than is taken in. It's that simple. It's not hard to sympathize with the "frustration of the demonstrators" as they are having a tough time (apparently) but is the target of their frustration "capitalism" or should it be more the very simple cause of the ramifications of a growing debt..... spending more than is taken in? Ron Paul indicated that on the news today. It's not capitalism.... it's spending more than is taken in. He was followed by an "Englishman" economist who said the "bailout" in the EU is only "kicking the can down the road." Italy is next followed by France whose banks are holding bonds that will undoubtedly fail. All of Europe looks to Germany (that frugal nation) for financial aid. Obviously, Germany can't and doesn't want to take it on the chin for nations who have lived beyond their means. China doesn't want any part of it. The US can't afford it. Perhaps Canada can chip in. They have money. If they don't they will go down with the rest. But, why should they? Why should Germany.. if the rest are not going to put the painful austere programs into affect that will very slowly bring the global financials back. But, has the dependent masses grown to such a size that their intolerance can't be contained? Why can't we look at Europe, accept the real causes of their predicament (and ours) and change our ways in time to prevent the same here. Maybe it's too late. The dependent masses may not allow it. So, they are taught to blame capitalism and not the over spending by governments. |
![]() |
|
| Mike | Nov 6 2011, 12:04 AM Post #12 |
|
Administrator
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
While it is true that social security and medicare are 20 century programs and Americans survived without either for 150 years, we can't overlook some facts. Americans in general have abandoned the community-family social network. The public education system does little to prepare graduates for the world they will live in. Globalization is a recent phenomenon as is corporatism. This is not the America of our forefathers. |
![]() |
|
| Thumper | Nov 6 2011, 12:54 AM Post #13 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I agree Mike. Used to be you could barter or raise crops and even hunt for your food. Didn't need gasoline to find a job. Didn't need electric, cable TV, telephone, sewer bill, water bill and pay taxes. |
![]() |
|
| Chris | Nov 6 2011, 02:02 AM Post #14 |
![]()
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So whose fault is this? The "the community-family social network" changed largely because with the rise of industrialization people left the farms, where they needed a large family of workers and depended on neighbors, to the cities where they could survive on wages that in time didn't require putting women and children to work, the family became more nuclear, and crowding isolated people from each other with the advent of telecommunications, radio, TV, and now the Internet. It's a world of greater wealth, greater risk, where anyone can rise higher and fall further. I have no problem with it, but it sounds like some would like to return to the past they yearn for. |
![]() |
|
| Mike | Nov 6 2011, 02:49 AM Post #15 |
|
Administrator
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm not in favor of returning to the past, but I do recognize that some of the hardship individuals and families face are a result of the changes the society goes through. As evidenced by the number of folks on some form of public assistance, Americans have not coped well with change. Particularly the economic changes which occurred as a result of the near financial meltdown and collapse of the housing industry. It wa ssudden and many folks simply could not adjust quickly enough. |
![]() |
|
| ngc1514 | Nov 6 2011, 04:10 AM Post #16 |
![]()
Moderator
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Amazing how many things are attributed to the wrong people. Probably for the same reason the de Tocqueville quote is mis-attributed... who the hell is Tytler? Sounds so much better than attributing it to someone unknown. Like the supposed Einstein quote that "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results." Of course, in quantum physics... you do get different results! |
![]() |
|
| Chris | Nov 6 2011, 04:49 AM Post #17 |
![]()
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So much for assumptions. But the truth of the statement shouldn't depend on who says it. |
![]() |
|
| ngc1514 | Nov 6 2011, 06:03 AM Post #18 |
![]()
Moderator
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No, it shouldn't. The truth should be demonstrated. |
![]() |
|
| Chris | Nov 6 2011, 07:38 AM Post #19 |
![]()
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It is, by two forms of welfare, social and corporate. |
![]() |
|
| tomdrobin | Nov 6 2011, 10:31 AM Post #20 |
|
Fire & Ice Senior Diplomat
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Agrarian extended families where women usually stayed at home to care for the children, and could then care for aging parents. And, those aging parents didn't live as long either. No high tech medicine, and low tech wasn't expensive. Divorce was rare, and if there were single parent families, it was usually because of a death in the family. Times have changed, and depending on your perspective better for some. Most of us would probably be taking dirt naps by now. Also, the increasing mobility has scattered family members accross the country in many cases. There were some things good about the good old days, but that's in the past we have to deal with the here and now. No doubt the developement of the welfare state was not such a good idea. Because it created much dependency. But, it's not going to go away with defunding it, not without some serious suffering. No argument that long term it would be good policy to reign in entitlement spending and pay down the debt. But, cutting taxes (what the government takes in) and then blaming the resulting deficits in an economic downturn as an excuse to drastically cut entitlements is bad policy. It makes about as much sense on a personal level as cutting your income because you can't make ends meet, and then using that as an excuse to kick the kids that are depending on you out. Globalization and the recession has hurt the middle and low income in this country, while at the same time created tremendous opportunity for corporate america and investors. It would seem to me pretty irresponsible to cut the safety net while those depending on it are having such a tough time already, while holding the line on lower taxes for those who have benefitted. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Fire And Ice General Discussion · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z3.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)





10:44 PM Jul 11
