I do not know why he wanted us to believe he did, with a numerous amount of baby mamas as well. Very interesting.
The poor sod is attention-starved.
However, he's still a liar!!
Either he has several children, by several different women, which is a lack of responsibility, no self respect, and suffering for sexual addictions. (probably abused as a child)
or all that stuff about Honeywell, is made up lies.
He needs to pick one, however either way, he is still a liar!
Well I do believe that he has fertilized some eggs.
But actually raising any of those children, no...
I'm not buying that.
I can't even count all of the father yodelers I know who fertilized eggs and never helped raise any of those kids.
I do not know why he wanted us to believe he did, with a numerous amount of baby mamas as well. Very interesting.
The poor sod is attention-starved.
However, he's still a liar!!
Either he has several children, by several different women, which is a lack of responsibility, no self respect, and suffering for sexual addictions. (probably abused as a child)
or all that stuff about Honeywell, is made up lies.
He needs to pick one, however either way, he is still a liar!
His inability to pick a course is one of the reasons why he never did anything with his life.
I have found in reading his posts, and especially his various accusations against me is his inability to stick to one, singular narrative. One post, I did this. Another post, I did something else entirely. The truth is singular, constant, and never changing. Not so with poor Cap'n Cherry Strudel.
That is the other thing about projecting. He constantly calls others dishonest, despite the absurd trail of contradictions he leaves behind.
I find it amusing that being over 37, he is compelled to "fix" comments, like some elementary school kid. He even went so far as to create a separate account for this habit.
As an adult, he should be able to deal with reality, not constantly retreat to his fantasy world.
Perhaps his emotional underdevelopment is the result of child abuse.
That might explain where the pedophilia came from.
He clearly sees me as the representation of some evil, abusive authority figure.
What I notice is that nobody is saying that he isn't primary caretaker of his children.
He spends more time trolling than with his children.
Just as Aaron Hernandez spent more time into his criminal activities than his children.
I guess it doesn't matter how little of himself a man gives to this children, people are going to say he's primary caretaker regardless.
Cis,
Let's clear this up, please.
In real time, woman are the primary caregivers of children. No one can dispute this. This is not to say, that men, cannot take care of a child, it's just pointing out, that the PRIMARY care givers, are women.
So, the next time a man says, well I take care of my child, good, you're supposed to. If you find a father with sole custody, the bio mother is generally close by. However, you can find neighborhoods of women, rearing children alone, with a whole bunch of men, idly standing by, saying,
"that ain't my kid"...
My questions however, are we the primary because of nature, social norms, or obligation?? Is it possible, that we altered nature, in staying with our young?
Just because something is, doesn't mean, it should be..
Not to high jack this thread, please let's put the argument to bed. Women do most, not all, but a larger percentage of, the rearing of children.
Even if a man is raising his child solo.
He is still a vice mother.
He is not primary.
A man can do his best, and his best may be more than good enough, but I don't think he can fully replace what a loving mother brings.
It helps if a grandmother, and/or aunt are in the picture to lend a hand if a mother is not available.
What I notice is that nobody is saying that he isn't primary caretaker of his children.
He spends more time trolling than with his children.
Just as Aaron Hernandez spent more time into his criminal activities than his children.
I guess it doesn't matter how little of himself a man gives to this children, people are going to say he's primary caretaker regardless.
Cis,
Let's clear this up, please.
In real time, woman are the primary caregivers of children. No one can dispute this. This is not to say, that men, cannot take care of a child, it's just pointing out, that the PRIMARY care givers, are women.
So, the next time a man says, well I take care of my child, good, you're supposed to. If you find a father with sole custody, the bio mother is generally close by. However, you can find neighborhoods of women, rearing children alone, with a whole bunch of men, idly standing by, saying,
"that ain't my kid"...
My questions however, are we the primary because of nature, social norms, or obligation?? Is it possible, that we altered nature, in staying with our young?
Just because something is, doesn't mean, it should be..
Not to high jack this thread, please let's put the argument to bed. Women do most, not all, but a larger percentage of, the rearing of children.
Even if a man is raising his child solo.
He is still a vice mother.
He is not primary.
A man can do his, and his best may be more than good enough, but I don't think he can fully replace what a loving mother brings.
It helps if a grandmother, and/or aunt are in the picture to lend a hand if a mother is not available.
What I notice is that nobody is saying that he isn't primary caretaker of his children.
He spends more time trolling than with his children.
Just as Aaron Hernandez spent more time into his criminal activities than his children.
I guess it doesn't matter how little of himself a man gives to this children, people are going to say he's primary caretaker regardless.
Cis,
Let's clear this up, please.
In real time, woman are the primary caregivers of children. No one can dispute this. This is not to say, that men, cannot take care of a child, it's just pointing out, that the PRIMARY care givers, are women.
So, the next time a man says, well I take care of my child, good, you're supposed to. If you find a father with sole custody, the bio mother is generally close by. However, you can find neighborhoods of women, rearing children alone, with a whole bunch of men, idly standing by, saying,
"that ain't my kid"...
My questions however, are we the primary because of nature, social norms, or obligation?? Is it possible, that we altered nature, in staying with our young?
Just because something is, doesn't mean, it should be..
Not to high jack this thread, please let's put the argument to bed. Women do most, not all, but a larger percentage of, the rearing of children.
Even if a man is raising his child solo.
He is still a vice mother.
He is not primary.
A man can do his best, and his best may be more than good enough, but I don't think he can fully replace what a loving mother brings.
It helps if a grandmother, and/or aunt are in the picture to lend a hand if a mother is not available.
Here is a funny, but superficial, example.
Yes, he put in the effort. Still, he did something that seemed difficult to him, but would be rather simple & painless for a mother.
No matter what is posted here in hatred's ocean won't change how I still control your emotions plus caused you to lose your scruples, real bad ...so you opted for pedophilia and your gay fad:
non-member Readers and viewers of this website...meet the male member, who goes to retrieve links and bring them back here for tryin turn this website into his own little fantasyland for his homosexuality and his pedophilia.
Feast your eyes on his not-so-Guilty-Pleasure he login to burden this website with:
Doctor Saul Santiago
Apr 12 2015, 05:27 PM
... guilty pleasure
And you ask?????
What kind of grown heterosexual male would sit up and let his mind drift onto this type of pic (above) in order to go seek it out and copy the image????
Well. Same type of pedophile who'll post this on a pro-Black website for adults:
Doctor Saul Santiago,Jan 14 2015
10:09 AM
Take ownership of your mea culpa and stop "projecting" it onto other members!