|
The Continuing…and Continuing…Obamacare Disaster
|
|
Topic Started: Nov 16 2013, 01:21 PM (269 Views)
|
|
Archaicwisdom
|
Nov 16 2013, 01:21 PM
Post #1
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,322
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,582
- Joined:
- May 31, 2012
|
Daniel Mitchell is a sophisticate with complaints AND solutions. I like him.
When I wrote a few days ago about the “Continuing Obamacare Disaster,” I didn’t realize I was understating the problems with the President’s boondoggle scheme.
Now that the law’s been passed and implemented, the American people are finally finding out what’s in it (per Nancy Pelosi) and they’re not happy.
Indeed, they’re so unhappy that our overseers in Washington are scrambling to mitigate the political fallout.
The Wall Street Journal opined today on the meaning of President Obama’s announcement.
- Quote:
-
In a major political reversal, the President announced at a surprise press conference that he is suspending the regulations that he now admits are the reason that millions of health insurance plans have been terminated. …Now these mass cancellations are proving to be unpopular, and Democrats are panicking, so Mr. Obama is offering a temporary stay of execution. …There is less reprieve here than Mr. Obama claims. It’s hard to un-cancel insurance. The rules Mr. Obama is repudiating were written in 2010, and insurers have been adapting to them for years. They will now have to scramble to revive the policies they can while throwing all of their actuarial assumptions out the window. The faux reprieve also lasts for only one year and applies only to anyone who was covered in 2013.
But even that’s not the full story. Here’s more of the editorial.
- Quote:
-
The burden will also now fall on state insurance commissioners to decide if they want to try to reapprove old plans, or something similar to the outlawed products. But even the insurers that want to exercise this option will need to resuscitate plans in a mere six weeks. The first they heard about the President’s “fix” was at the press conference. …Such regulatory rewriting is also probably illegal. The Administration claims it has “enforcement discretion” to suspend the regulations. But like the employer mandate Mr. Obama also delayed for a year, their hard start-dates are defined in the statute—January 1, 2014. The black-letter law of the Affordable Care Act does not say the rules apply whenever they are politically convenient.
Megan McArdle also thinks the White House is brazenly disregarding legal requirements.
- Quote:
-
The administration is not changing the rules, just declining to enforce them against the insurers. This is becoming a pattern: Obama’s position on the law seems to be that it’s his law, and therefore the law is whatever he and his appointees say it is. That’s dangerous for all sorts of reasons.
I’ll be less polite and say that the President is acting like America is a banana republic and he’s the tinpot dictator who can arbitrarily decide the law.
Keep this going and we’ll eventually be Argentina.
Though maybe this isn’t a bad thing. If I can somehow magically become President, I can use the Obama precedent to suspend bad tax law and to unilaterally decide to shut down a bunch of wasteful government departments.
Returning to the real world, Veronique de Rugy gives us a very important reminder in the Washington Examiner that this mess was entirely predictable because of the inherent incompetence and inefficiency of government.
- Quote:
-
Washington is missing the bigger picture of what the rollout glitches represent. That’s the much deeper problem of government intervention in general. …government-program incentives tend to favor interest groups instead of rewarding success or punishing failure in the same way as the market. …In sum, the problem with the Obamacare rollout is…that government institutions themselves are inherently prone to bad decision-making, often choosing the interest of politically favored groups. …In fact, we can expect these types of negative consequences when the government intervenes in any market — not just health care. For proof, look no further than the flawed government policies that distorted the health care system and prompted the push for Obamacare in the first place.
The final sentence is spot on. Our healthcare system was dysfunctional when Obama took office. But it was screwed up because of government intervention. So Obama’s plan to add another layer of government was a very painful example of Mitchell’s Law.
In reality, you don’t solve government-caused problems with more government.
But this brings us to the big issue of what happens next. The statists will argue that the failure of Obamacare means we need single payer healthcare, which means the government has full control of everything, like in the United Kingdom.
Needless to say, that would be a disaster. More spending and more taxes would be one obvious consequence, but it would also mean that politicians and bureaucrats would decide who lives and who dies. Stalin UK HealthIf you think that’s an exaggeration, check out this horror story (as well as the other examples linked in the third paragraph).
For those of us who care about both taxpayers and good healthcare, we need to use the Obamacare meltdown as a springboard to push for policies that will actually make the system work better.
I actually wrote back in April that Obamacare wouldn’t work and that this would create precisely this opportunity. But making a prediction is the easy part (especially since I never remind people of the times when I make inaccurate predictions). The hard part is pushing the right policies and convincing the American people that we have the right ideas.
I’m a think tank wonk, so I’ll simply list the good policies.
As part of fundamental tax reform, we need to phase out the healthcare exclusion in the tax code – a perverse policy that encourages grotesque waste, inefficiency, and featherbedding in most parts of the medical industry.
We also should reform Medicaid and Medicare to help address the part of the third-party payer crisis caused by the direct government intervention.
If you want to get an idea of how a genuine market-based system would operate, watch this superb video from Reason TV. If you want more examples, here’s a report from North Carolina on free-market healthcare in action and here’s a similar story about capitalist healthcare in Maine.
http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/danieljmitchell/2013/11/16/the-continuingand-continuingobamacare-disaster-n1747448/page/full
|
|
|
| |
|
Affinity
|
Nov 17 2013, 09:23 PM
Post #2
|
|
- Posts:
- 3,596
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,997
- Joined:
- Jul 1, 2013
|
The number of doctors that stopped taking insurance increased by 50% in the past year.
- Quote:
-
NO MORE INSURANCE – Doctors moving to cash-only model and they LOVE IT…
Now this is the type of innovation that excites me. These cash-only doctors have moved to a membership-based model that allows them to provide higher quality care at much lower costs and they don’t have to deal with insurance companies any longer. This sounds fantastic:
FOX 8 – Fed up with declining payments and rising red tape, a small but growing number of doctors are opting out of the insurance system completely. They’re expecting patients to pony up with cash.
Some doctors who have gone that route love it, saying they can spend more time with and provide higher-quality care to their patients. Health advocates are skeptical, worrying that only the wealthy will benefit from this system.
In Wichita, Kansas, 32-year old family physician Doug Nunamaker switched to a cash-only basis in 2010 after taking insurance for five years. (“Cash-only” is a loose description. Nunamaker accepts payment by debit or credit card too.)
Under the traditional health insurance system, a large staff was required just to navigate all the paperwork, he said. That resulted in high overhead, forcing doctors like Nunamaker to take on more patients to cover costs. Plus, the amount insurance companies were willing to pay for procedures was declining, leading to a vicious cycle.
“The paperwork, the hassles, it just got to be overwhelming,” Nunamaker said. “We knew that we had to find a better way to practice.”
So Nunamaker and his partner set up a membership-based practice called Atlas M.D. — a nod to free-market champion Ayn Rand’s book Atlas Shrugged. Under the membership plan — also known as “concierge” medicine — each patient pays a flat monthly fee to have unlimited access to the doctors and any service they can provide in the office, such as EKGs or stitches.
The fee varies depending on age. For kids, it’s $10 a month. For adults up to age 44, it’s $50 a month. Senior citizens pay $100.
The office has negotiated deals for services outside the office. By cutting out the middleman, Nunamaker said he can get a cholesterol test done for $3, versus the $90 the lab company he works with once billed to insurance carriers. An MRI can be had for $400, compared to a typical billed rate of $2,000 or more.
Nunamaker encourages his patients to carry some type of high-deductible health insurance plan in case of an emergency or serious illness. But for the everyday stuff, he said his plan works better for both doctor and patient.
Nunamaker now has a patient list totaling 400 to 600, compared to the 2,500 to 4,000 he said a typical family physician usually maintains. He’s quite happy with his annual salary of around $200,000.
“My professional life is better than expected, my family life and personal time is better than expected,” he said. “This is everything I wanted out of family medicine.”
It’s believed that only a small number of doctors have switched to a cash-only model. The American Academy of Family Physicians said about 4% of respondents to a 2012 survey reported taking only cash, up from 3% in 2010. A Medscape survey found 6% of physicians in the cash-only business in 2013, up from 4% in 2012.
Most are primary care doctors, though not all. http://therightscoop.com/no-more-insurance-doctors-moving-to-cash-only-model-and-they-love-it/
Edited by Affinity, Nov 17 2013, 09:24 PM.
|
|
|
| |
|
Archaicwisdom
|
Nov 17 2013, 10:27 PM
Post #3
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,322
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,582
- Joined:
- May 31, 2012
|
- Affinity
- Nov 17 2013, 09:23 PM
The number of doctors that stopped taking insurance increased by 50% in the past year. - Quote:
-
NO MORE INSURANCE – Doctors moving to cash-only model and they LOVE IT…
Now this is the type of innovation that excites me. These cash-only doctors have moved to a membership-based model that allows them to provide higher quality care at much lower costs and they don’t have to deal with insurance companies any longer. This sounds fantastic:
FOX 8 – Fed up with declining payments and rising red tape, a small but growing number of doctors are opting out of the insurance system completely. They’re expecting patients to pony up with cash.
Some doctors who have gone that route love it, saying they can spend more time with and provide higher-quality care to their patients. Health advocates are skeptical, worrying that only the wealthy will benefit from this system.
In Wichita, Kansas, 32-year old family physician Doug Nunamaker switched to a cash-only basis in 2010 after taking insurance for five years. (“Cash-only” is a loose description. Nunamaker accepts payment by debit or credit card too.)
Under the traditional health insurance system, a large staff was required just to navigate all the paperwork, he said. That resulted in high overhead, forcing doctors like Nunamaker to take on more patients to cover costs. Plus, the amount insurance companies were willing to pay for procedures was declining, leading to a vicious cycle.
“The paperwork, the hassles, it just got to be overwhelming,” Nunamaker said. “We knew that we had to find a better way to practice.”
So Nunamaker and his partner set up a membership-based practice called Atlas M.D. — a nod to free-market champion Ayn Rand’s book Atlas Shrugged. Under the membership plan — also known as “concierge” medicine — each patient pays a flat monthly fee to have unlimited access to the doctors and any service they can provide in the office, such as EKGs or stitches.
The fee varies depending on age. For kids, it’s $10 a month. For adults up to age 44, it’s $50 a month. Senior citizens pay $100.
The office has negotiated deals for services outside the office. By cutting out the middleman, Nunamaker said he can get a cholesterol test done for $3, versus the $90 the lab company he works with once billed to insurance carriers. An MRI can be had for $400, compared to a typical billed rate of $2,000 or more.
Nunamaker encourages his patients to carry some type of high-deductible health insurance plan in case of an emergency or serious illness. But for the everyday stuff, he said his plan works better for both doctor and patient.
Nunamaker now has a patient list totaling 400 to 600, compared to the 2,500 to 4,000 he said a typical family physician usually maintains. He’s quite happy with his annual salary of around $200,000.
“My professional life is better than expected, my family life and personal time is better than expected,” he said. “This is everything I wanted out of family medicine.”
It’s believed that only a small number of doctors have switched to a cash-only model. The American Academy of Family Physicians said about 4% of respondents to a 2012 survey reported taking only cash, up from 3% in 2010. A Medscape survey found 6% of physicians in the cash-only business in 2013, up from 4% in 2012.
Most are primary care doctors, though not all. http://therightscoop.com/no-more-insurance-doctors-moving-to-cash-only-model-and-they-love-it/ Yep, this would definitely put cash-strapped folks at a big disadvantage.
|
|
|
| |
|
Zechariah
|
Nov 17 2013, 11:01 PM
Post #4
|
|
Zechariah
- Posts:
- 25,169
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #563
- Joined:
- Jun 24, 2010
|
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH GOT 'EM!!
|
|
|
| |
|
Archaicwisdom
|
Nov 17 2013, 11:03 PM
Post #5
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,322
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,582
- Joined:
- May 31, 2012
|
hahaha @ karl marx statue.
|
|
|
| |
|
Snidely Whiplash
|
Nov 17 2013, 11:22 PM
Post #6
|
|
- Posts:
- 15,286
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,630
- Joined:
- Jul 23, 2012
|
- Zechariah
- Nov 17 2013, 11:01 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH GOT 'EM!!
Good one Z, especially since he is the so-called constitutional scholar
|
|
|
| |
|
Archaicwisdom
|
Nov 17 2013, 11:24 PM
Post #7
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,322
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,582
- Joined:
- May 31, 2012
|
yes, that one is fraught with irony. Thanks for the laughs.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|