Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Bad news for the new health care bill
Topic Started: Oct 7 2013, 10:52 PM (2,344 Views)
Affinity
Member Avatar

In a JFKerry-esque move, they did ... before they didn't - at least that was how the opinions were written.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Snidely Whiplash
Member Avatar

catdaddy25
Oct 8 2013, 07:49 PM
If ObamaCare is that bad then the republican lead supreme court wouldn't had rule it's favor
You should put the Obama Kool-Aid down and think about this question you posed. Red pill or Blue pill. The choice is in your hands.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
catdaddy25
Member Avatar

Snidely Whiplash
Oct 9 2013, 01:39 AM
catdaddy25
Oct 8 2013, 07:49 PM
If ObamaCare is that bad then the republican lead supreme court wouldn't had rule it's favor
You should put the Obama Kool-Aid down and think about this question you posed. Red pill or Blue pill. The choice is in your hands.
I'm just stating the facts. You the one who seems to be in denial ! Maybe you are not thinking about what you are saying......???
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Black Republican
Member Avatar

Democrats don't want to see the truth.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
catdaddy25
Member Avatar

Black Republican
Oct 9 2013, 09:11 PM
Democrats don't want to see the truth.
If ObamaCare is that bad then the republican lead supreme court wouldn't had rule it's favor. Isn't that truth????
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Affinity
Member Avatar

catdaddy25
Oct 10 2013, 12:28 AM
Black Republican
Oct 9 2013, 09:11 PM
Democrats don't want to see the truth.
If ObamaCare is that bad then the republican lead supreme court wouldn't had rule it's favor. Isn't that truth????
No, not even close to the truth. That's a gross misunderstanding of the workings of our government. The SC doesn't determine if a bill is good or bad, it only determines if something is Constitutional.

As a tax, Obamacare is legal. "It's not tax" was the selling point. The government cannot force you to engage in commerce. The government cannot force you to buy insurance. The government can tax the shit out of you though.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ether

Marcus
Oct 8 2013, 06:23 PM
The health care website is so terrible people can't even get on there to look around.

1. They say that the website is down for repairs.

2. That like having a brand new car and you got to take it back to the shop to get it repaired the next day.
That's a dumb argument. He'll look at your shitty website of 10 members. And it's down sometimes.



Nobody can really predict server stability when launching something new. Especially with massive amount of people using it around the nation.


So to try to come up with conspiracy that the republicans are doing it in purposes using money and power to log on. Or democrats purposely broke it so nobody can see.....is just dumb.
You political puppets sure do crack me up.....it's always the other sides fault. Logical answers don't exist.



You political puppets
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Affinity
Member Avatar

Ether
Oct 10 2013, 11:51 AM
Nobody can really predict server stability when launching something new. Especially with massive amount of people using it around the nation.
The exact cost to build Healthcare.gov, according to U.S. government records, appears to have been $634,320,919, which was paid to a company you probably never heard of: CGI Federal. The company won the original $93.7 million contract back in 2011.

From $94 million to $634 million in 2 years, and it doesn't work.

Ether
Oct 10 2013, 11:51 AM
You political puppets sure do crack me up.....
I'm glad you enjoy your comments as much as I do.
Edited by Affinity, Oct 10 2013, 01:10 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ether

Affinity
Oct 10 2013, 01:09 PM
Ether
Oct 10 2013, 11:51 AM
Nobody can really predict server stability when launching something new. Especially with massive amount of people using it around the nation.
The exact cost to build Healthcare.gov, according to U.S. government records, appears to have been $634,320,919, which was paid to a company you probably never heard of: CGI Federal. The company won the original $93.7 million contract back in 2011.

From $94 million to $634 million in 2 years, and it doesn't work.

Ether
Oct 10 2013, 11:51 AM
You political puppets sure do crack me up.....
I'm glad you enjoy your comments as much as I do.
You know nothing of developing, what you posted Doesn't have shit to do with stability of a website with millions upon millions of people trying to get in. Just you and other political poops trying to reach with your conspiracy theory.

I can give you 600 million to make me a website to hold millions of users and you couldn't do it either. Wasted money on a company who doesn't know how to do shit apparently, especially when we have companies that do it on a daily basis. Who could of taken less money maybe, and still made a stable site


This site was never stress tested. 2 million people making accounts in 90 minutes? That's one hell of a load..... You basically got a beta of the site that's being stress testing while it's out


Give it time and let it smooth out
Edited by Ether, Oct 10 2013, 01:50 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ether

Though i agree with you if you are saying that money was thrown away.....which it was. 600 million of tax payers money was used for CGI to make a site that isn't even up to standards with more complicated sites that work.


They should of let google make it
Edited by Ether, Oct 10 2013, 01:58 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Learn More · Register Now
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Politics & Government · Next Topic »
Add Reply