|
The first slave owner in America was a black man
|
|
Topic Started: Jul 16 2013, 05:09 PM (226 Views)
|
|
Affinity
|
Jul 16 2013, 05:09 PM
Post #1
|
|
- Posts:
- 3,596
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,997
- Joined:
- Jul 1, 2013
|
The first slave owner in America was a black man
Actual drawing of Anthony Johnson, the first slave owner in the colonies. According to colonial records, the first slave owner in the United States was a black man.
Prior to 1655 there were no legal chattel slaves in the colonies, only indentured servants. All masters were required to free their servants after their time was up. Seven years was the limit that an indentured servant could be held. Upon their release they were granted 50 acres of land. This included any black African purchased from slave traders. Blacks were also granted 50 acres upon their release.
Anthony Johnson was a Negro from modern-day Angola. He was brought to the US to work on a tobacco farm in 1619. In 1622 he was almost killed when Powhatan Indians attacked the farm. 52 out of 57 people on the farm perished in the attack. He married a female black servant while working on the farm.
When Anthony was released he was legally recognized as a “free Negro” and ran a successful farm. In 1651 he held 250 acres and five black indentured servants. In 1654, it was time for Anthony to release John Casor, a black indentured servant. Instead Anthony told Casor he was extending his time. Casor left and became employed by the free white man Robert Parker.
Anthony Johnson sued Robert Parker in the Northampton Court in 1654. In 1655, the court ruled that Anthony Johnson could hold John Casor indefinitely. The court gave judicial sanction for blacks to own members of their own race as chattel slaves. Thus Casor became the first permanent slave and Johnson the first slave owner.
Whites still could not legally hold a black servant as a chattel slave until 1670. In that year, the colonial assembly passed legislation permitting free whites, blacks, and Indians the right to own blacks as slaves.
By 1699, the number of free blacks prompted fears of a “Negro insurrection.” Virginia Colonial ordered the repatriation of freed blacks back to Africa. Many blacks sold themselves to white masters so they would not have to go to Africa. This was the first effort to gently repatriate free blacks back to Africa. The modern nations of Sierra Leone and Liberia both originated as colonies of repatriated former black slaves.
However, black slave owners continued to thrive in the United States.
By 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. By 1860 there were about 3,000 slaves owned by black households in the city of New Orleans alone.
link
Has anyone heard this version of history before? Not me.
|
|
|
| |
|
negroplease
|
Jul 16 2013, 05:15 PM
Post #2
|
|
- Posts:
- 31,973
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #578
- Joined:
- Jul 14, 2010
|
Does this take away from the horrid travesty that was the transatlantic slave trade though?
I find most people who like to tout this fact try to deflect from that.
|
|
|
| |
|
negroplease
|
Jul 16 2013, 05:16 PM
Post #3
|
|
- Posts:
- 31,973
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #578
- Joined:
- Jul 14, 2010
|
And yes.
I have heard that black people owned slaves.
They owned slaves in Africa as well.
|
|
|
| |
|
kennyinbmore
|
Jul 16 2013, 05:29 PM
Post #4
|
|
- Posts:
- 18,350
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #452
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2010
|
Most of that I've read. Although the part about blacks selling themselves to avoid going to Africa is something I never heard
|
|
|
| |
|
Affinity
|
Jul 16 2013, 06:12 PM
Post #5
|
|
- Posts:
- 3,596
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,997
- Joined:
- Jul 1, 2013
|
- EveryonelovesSUA
- Jul 16 2013, 05:15 PM
Does this take away from the horrid travesty that was the transatlantic slave trade though? Hell no it doesn't.
It does make the it more of a human crime and not necessarily a solely white crime though.
In other words, all slavery was wrong. All slavery still is wrong.
This should be a civilized human vs un-civilized human issue. This should not be a racial issue. Forgetting, or denying, what happened in the past would be wrong. Bitching about past while ignoring the present is hypocritical.
- Quote:
-
the levels of slavery and people trafficking today are greater than at any point in hisry. Surely that cannot be right?
Obviously there is no precise figure, but the International Labor Organization and respected abolitionists like Kevin Bales and Siddharth Kara put the global number of slaves at between 10-30 million worldwide. At a minimum, 10 million.
The United Nations estimates the total market value of human trafficking at 32 billion U.S. dollars. In Europe, criminals are pocketing around $2.5 billion per year through sexual exploitation and forced labor. http://thecnnfreedomproject.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/04/modern-day-slavery-a-problem-that-cant-be-ignored/
|
|
|
| |
|
Affinity
|
Jul 16 2013, 06:13 PM
Post #6
|
|
- Posts:
- 3,596
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,997
- Joined:
- Jul 1, 2013
|
http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/2013/apr/03/families-mali-slavery-culture-conflict
- Quote:
-
Families in Mali splintered by slavery as culture and conflict converge Tuareg rebels are capitalising on fighting in Mali to reacquire former captives whom they regard as their property from birth • Mali's lax laws make an anti-slavery activism tough Wednesday 3 April 2013
"I haven't heard anything about my brother for more than a year," says Raichatou Walet Touka. She's been living at a safehouse in Bamako, Mali's capital, after fleeing the northern town of Gao following an attack by the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA), a Tuareg rebel group that briefly took over northern Mali in early 2012.
Thousands were displaced by the fighting, and the subsequent battle for control of northern Mali between Islamist rebels and the MNLA. But the situation facing Raichatou has been particularly perilous, for she comes from a family considered by many in the MNLA leadership as slaves.
"I can't sleep at night," she says, wiping away tears. "I wake up feeling bad and thinking about my family who are still there."
In 2008, Raichatou escaped slavery in the northern desert town of Menaka, heading for the relative safety of Gao. But when the MNLA took control, she fled, fearing her old Tuareg slave masters might try to recapture her.
Anti-slavery groups say the conflict and ensuing political chaos in Mali has worsened the situation facing the 250,000 people who live in conditions of slavery in the west African state. The MNLA leadership and parts of the Ansar Dine Islamist group, which fought for control of the north last year, come from Tuareg noble families, some of whom are responsible for continuing the practice of slavery in Mali.
Malian anti-slavery organisation Temedt has reported cases of slave masters profiting from the chaos of the past year to recapture former slaves, including at least 18 children seized from one village last September. Raichatou believes this is the fate that may have befallen her brother, Ismagir Ag Touka.
Although slavery is a crime against humanity in Mali's constitution, it remains deeply ingrained in the culture. For centuries, descent-based slavery – where slavery is passed down through the bloodline – has resulted in "black Tamasheq" (the Tuareg's language) families in Mali's north being used as slaves by nomadic Tuareg communities. Generations of children have been considered the property of the Tuaregs from birth.
Despite the constitution, slavery is still not illegal in Mali, making it difficult for anti-slavery groups to launch criminal prosecutions.
Raichatou became a slave at the age of seven when her mother, also a slave, died. "My father could only watch on helplessly as my mother's master came to claim me and my brothers," she says. She worked as a servant for the family without pay for nearly 20 years, and was forced into a marriage with another slave whom she didn't know.
"My master only wanted me to have children so that he would have more slaves in the future. My opinion did not count. I had to live with a man I had not chosen for three years. They told me that the only way I would get to heaven was to obey my master."
In 2008, she heard about Temedt and made her bid for freedom; finally, she was reunited with her father.
"My instinct for liberty was telling me to grab every opportunity to be free, but my slave mentality was telling me the opposite" she says.
Now, Temedt's work helping liberate people has been severely restricted. Its activists cannot travel safely and security is volatile.
Efforts to bring civil compensation cases to court on behalf of escaped slaves have stalled with the collapse of Malian state institutions across the north. At least 17 slavery compensation cases that were going through the courts remain unresolved. There has been no progress on Raichatou's case. "I feel like everything we achieved has come to nothing. I have no hope," she says.
"The absence of the state has left people without recourse or protection," says Sarah Mathewson, Africa programme co-ordinator at Anti-Slavery International.
Funding for Temedt has been drying up, as donors pulled out of Mali following the coup in March 2012. A microcredit scheme for women of slave descent and a legal clinic offering advice to escapees have closed.
"Our work has ground to a halt," says Intamat Ag Inkadewane, a community organiser for Temedt, who also fled Gao. "I'm just sitting here in Bamako; I'm not working, I'm not getting paid. There are things I want to do in the north, but we have no way of knowing when we can get back there."
The recent French intervention in Mali does seem to be paying some security dividends with most of the Islamist fighters driven out of the main urban areas. But many slaves and ex-slaves say they still do not feel safe, since a new Tuareg group, the Islamic Movement for Azawad, is in control of the remote town of Kidal.
Temedt's president, Ibrahim Ag Idbaltanat, says he hopes its work can soon resume. Elections due in July could provide a rare window of opportunity, according to Mathewson: "People of slave descent should be consulted and represented in national and international efforts to address the crisis so this issue is not forgotten."
|
|
|
| |
|
The SOLE Controller
|
Jul 16 2013, 07:01 PM
Post #7
|
|
- Posts:
- 24,263
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #409
- Joined:
- Mar 6, 2010
|
- EveryonelovesSUA
- Jul 16 2013, 05:16 PM
And yes.
I have heard that black people owned slaves.
They owned slaves in Africa as well.
lol @ you never having a word to post to me, when I mention how lightskinned Blacks owned darkskinned-Black slaves since the 1620's
...rofl...
Y'all sit in silence when I post this same shyt for months, but yall act 'brand new' whenever racists come along with the same info
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|