Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
NEWSFLASH: Eric Holder announces the pursuit of Hate-Crime charges VS Zimmerman
Topic Started: Jul 15 2013, 05:39 AM (2,280 Views)
Affinity
Member Avatar

kennyinbmore
Jul 15 2013, 11:35 PM
I don't see a federal case happening. There's no way to prove it was motivated by race
When has the truth mattered to this scandalous administration?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Affinity
Member Avatar

Snidely Whiplash
Jul 16 2013, 02:47 AM
kennyinbmore
Jul 15 2013, 12:35 PM
Eye for an Eye
Jul 15 2013, 12:32 PM
Zimmerman was found not guilty, because procecutors in Florida are a joke.
He was found not guilty because of reasonable doubt. No prosecutor in the country could have won that case
No, he was found not guilty because of racism.
It's a laugh a minute in here today.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
VoiceofReason

Snidely Whiplash
Jul 16 2013, 02:47 AM
kennyinbmore
Jul 15 2013, 12:35 PM
Eye for an Eye
Jul 15 2013, 12:32 PM
Zimmerman was found not guilty, because procecutors in Florida are a joke.

He was found not guilty because of reasonable doubt. No prosecutor in the country could have won that case
No, he was found not guilty because of racism. If they can lock up vick for dog fighting and allow that mutha fucka walk, I aint buying bullshit.
Besos! :wub:
Edited by VoiceofReason, Jul 16 2013, 11:36 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Affinity
Member Avatar

Snidely Whiplash
Jul 16 2013, 02:53 AM
Affinity
Jul 15 2013, 06:03 PM
Ether
Jul 15 2013, 05:59 PM
Affinity....just stop.
Stop providing balance?
It's not balance it's bullshit. Have you thoroughly convinced yourself yet or is there a residue of integrity in you that still tells you it was murder no matter how much you spin it.
It is racism - ON YOUR PART.

You are ONLY concerned with this because it was a white killing a black. Reverse the races and you WOULD agree with the jury's decision ... and so would I. My opinion would change if the races were switched, your's would.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ether

kennyinbmore
Jul 16 2013, 11:07 AM
Ether
Jul 16 2013, 10:59 AM
How do you guys figure they were irrelevant though?


Why not question Zimmerman on why he needed to lie period if he was simply defending himself?

Why not question how he got that gun from behind his back?

Why not ask the same question whoopi Goldberg asked o'mara?
Why not ask why did you lie about SYG which is what they tried to shove down everyone's throat as to why he was killed?
Why not ask about his fuzzy memory on different stories of what happened?

Why not ask about trayvons body wasn't near concrete? Yet he said trayvon said "you got me" and fell over? Remember trayvon was beating his head in the concrete when he shot him. How is that not relevant?





How is trayvons past school behavior relevant? How is trayvons text messages about a fight with someone else in Miami relevant? How is trayvon holding a gun in a picture that wasn't taken that night relevant?
You can question whatever you want, but that doesn't equal proof of anything that happened that night which is the burden the state had. And as far as I know Zimmerman didn't take the stand so he couldn't be asked anything. For the record I also believed TM's past was equally as irrelevant to what happened that night
How do you figure changing the story of what happened when someone died isn't relevant?????



Lmao wtf.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The SOLE Controller
Member Avatar

reddgirl64
Jul 16 2013, 11:31 AM
I just don't get, what they are not understanding about how the system works? What is allowed, what's not, etc.....
But you wanted jury to know Trayvon was kicked out of school, weeks prior, for possessing an empty marijuana bag?


LOL


Don't you hate it? That I'm able to see right thru every oz. of deceit you post????
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Affinity
Member Avatar

reddgirl64
Jul 16 2013, 10:41 AM
Ether
Jul 16 2013, 10:29 AM
Quote:
 
Juries are bound to judge based off what has been presented. Make yourself the defendant, wouldn't you want the same treatment?
Redd, idk. Juror b37 seems to think otherwise
What you're ignoring is, you are just like that juror. You don't have an open mind, you convicted GZ before the trial, before all of the evidence, etc...

But yet, you don't like it when this juror does it?

Now, show me, what's the difference?
100% true.

The difference? The juror is white, and automatically makes her racist. Why is she racist? BECAUSE SHE DISAGREES WITH A BLACK PERSON!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Affinity
Member Avatar

Ether
Jul 16 2013, 10:51 AM
To some up the above. I don't need to make an excuse as to why this person killed a boy of color and ignore the obvious around me. I don't ignore how they treated this crime vs others
You expose yourself with every post.

Take away that color and you wouldn't care about that boy.
Edited by Affinity, Jul 16 2013, 11:41 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The SOLE Controller
Member Avatar

U Thant
Jul 16 2013, 10:52 AM
Snidely Whiplash
Jul 16 2013, 02:44 AM
Truthie
Jul 15 2013, 10:39 AM
I'll pray to that.

But....... Hate Crimes are even more difficult to prove without witnesses who bring it to light. Even more difficult to prove.

I think the consideration is merely posturing.
I'm with ya truthie.
True, true indeed. But we have witnesses, so that makes this case entirely different.

Stay keen, to not do like others here and fall for reddgirl's deceit.


The police dispatch, are witnesses. Zimmerman's neighborhood watch committee, are witnesses, once they verify that the decision was made and premeditated by their patrol, to racially-profile Black males. Just because the racist Prosecutor didn't mention this fact, doesn't mean the Fed won't. Most importantly, Zimmerman clearly conveyed to dispatch that he had not made contact nor spoken with Trayvon ---yet he name-called Trayvon to dispatch, on 2 different occasions--- without provocation. Including once, after identifying Trayvon as Black.

All three (3) of these actions, point to malice and contempt in his heart for Trayvon---without provocation. Therefore any violence after those events, is hate crime violence.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Affinity
Member Avatar

Ether
Jul 16 2013, 10:59 AM
How do you guys figure they were irrelevant though?
Because we have the ability to weigh facts and testimony regardless of color.

You don't.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply