- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Susan Rice and Condi Rice DOUBLE STANDARD! | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 15 2012, 12:38 PM (625 Views) | |
| Snidely Whiplash | Nov 16 2012, 02:23 PM Post #11 |
![]()
|
First he went on to americans, to the UN, and even cut a video talking about it was the video that sparked the 9/11 killings. Even had the guy who did the video on national tv paraded out in the middle of the night. In the debate with romney he was claiming he said it was an act of terrorism. At this point I guess he had to because it's hard to explain how in a spontaneous demonstration people are showing up with rocket propelled grenades and heavy weaponry. Then in a 60 minutes interview, in a segment cut out but later released he said they don't know if it was terrorism but still investigating. Just pure bullshit. Just pure lies. Now I'm hearing Patreaus saying to congress he said it was terrorism from day one while congress members are saying that's not what he told them originally. You know what's going on. They have lied big time and now it's time to circle the wagons and get their stories straight. Their were warnings about Benghazi and a whole lot of shit going on there. The Red Cross and the Brits left weeks earlier. Ya mean the red cross and the brits had better intel than we? Then the ambassador asked for more security and never recieved it. Obama was asked about this in one of the debates. He didn't even answer. Just went off into the weeds about something else cause he's the smartest guy in the room. He figured y'all wouldn't even see he's not addressing the question. Susan Rice was sent out to deliver the party line. In a funny way I'm defending her more because I know she's smarter than her supporters are giving her credit. She served under Clinton (so to speak) at the UN when the shit was going down in North Africa with Ethiopia. So she's seen this shit before. She had to know damn well this was bullshit but went along with the party line. That said you gotta be careful when you go against principles cause while you might benefit, it could also bite you in the ass. Patraeus is trying to cover his ass now. Look, in some ways I'm sympathetic towards Susan. Her boss is a pathological liar and will lie to your face with greater ease than many people can in telling the truth. I don't think Susan is of that caliber though I could be wrong. So now, what was all this lying about? Was it to cover them not sending support to these folks prior to and during the 9/11 debacle? Who knows and with this corrupt government we'll probably never know. Just be glad the ones who were killed weren't people none of us care about, right! Edited by Snidely Whiplash, Nov 16 2012, 02:28 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Whozthatgurl | Nov 16 2012, 02:53 PM Post #12 |
![]()
#ITISWHATITIS
|
@Snidely
Are you that naive to believe that the President would have the full picture of an event that took place 2 months ago. Are you that naive to believe that the CIA would tell the President classified information that is still a ongoing process?
Patraeus is the CIA director. ITS A FREAKING ON GOING INVESTIGATION. Of course he is going to have more knowledge of what took place. IT'S HIS JOB. But Patraeus ALSO told congress that UNCLASSIFIED information was given to the Obama administration. A FULL INVESTIGATION is still on going. IT'S THE REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS THAT IS TRYING TO SUGGEST THAT THERE IS A COVER UP BEFORE THE INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETE.
By the looks on the faces of the republicans who are trying to drum up a scandal, I can tell that are dissapointed. The story is becoming clear.
ASK DAVID PATRAEUS THE CIA DIRECTOR ABOUT THAT. Like I said before you do not here the republicans criticizing one of their own. He is a God to them.
Now you are talking crap for the sake of talking crap and you know it. As far as the debate, Obama chose not to answer. When will you people stop underestimating him? He keeps it close to the vest.
Yep!! Susan Rice is use to working for democrat administrations that the republicans love to try and find a scandal to dig up on. "WHITE WATER", "TRAVEL GATE". Sound familiar.
Hater.... get over it. the pathological liar won.
Yep!! Just like we will never know what was behind 911. As far as this 9/11 David Patraeus was the CIA director and it was his job to see if support was indeed needed at that embassy. Edited by Whozthatgurl, Nov 16 2012, 02:55 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Snidely Whiplash | Nov 16 2012, 04:04 PM Post #13 |
![]()
|
Ok. I must be naive. I have nothing further to add. |
![]() |
|
| Snidely Whiplash | Nov 16 2012, 08:25 PM Post #14 |
![]()
|
|
![]() |
|
| Whozthatgurl | Nov 17 2012, 04:36 AM Post #15 |
![]()
#ITISWHATITIS
|
Right Wing Bullshit in it's finest... |
![]() |
|
| Mal | Nov 17 2012, 08:07 AM Post #16 |
|
I wonder why the Republicans will not do some real soul searching and accept the bitter truth that there is no Benghazi story and it is an unfortunate act that happened. 4 dead is tragic but lets get real that thousands died due to Bush and Condoleeza Rice lying about WMDs. Thousands of Americans died in Iraq and Afghanistan on 9/11 and 12 embassy attacks happened. Bush is a war crimanal yet no Republican called for an inquiry then. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community. Learn More · Register for Free |
|
| « Previous Topic · Politics & Government · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2









4:55 AM Jul 11