|Jesse Jackson Jr called out Obama|
|Topic Started: Jul 19 2012, 10:57 PM (796 Views)|
|Minister Of Information||Jul 19 2012, 10:57 PM Post #1|
Jesse Jackson Jr called out Obama for not keeping his campaign promise of pushing for a raise in the minium wage. Soon after that Jesse Jackson Jr disappeared from the public saying that he has medical problems.
|U Thant||Jul 19 2012, 11:12 PM Post #2|
||I wouldn't doubt it...lol...you know how angry Obama gets when any non-GOPer Blacks, don't fall for the okie-doke.|
|Truth95||Jul 19 2012, 11:16 PM Post #3|
Do you think Obama did something to Jesse Jackson Jr, they say that Chicago politics is dirty.
|U Thant||Jul 19 2012, 11:33 PM Post #4|
I wouldn't doubt it...Obama is a shrewd crude mufu indeed;
you see he got Maxine Waters brought up on Ethics Violations-----for going around with a list in her pocket, for a year, of Black-owned banks who Obama refused to ensure they got TARP monies they were promised...while he made sure all of the White-owned banks got what they were supposed to.
Edited by U Thant, Jul 19 2012, 11:33 PM.
|Truth95||Jul 19 2012, 11:39 PM Post #5|
I agree with you Shirley Sherrod was the black woman that worked in Agriculture Department, and Obama threw her under the bus when Fox news made up lies on her.
Obama is not loyal to anybody.
Edited by Truth95, Jul 19 2012, 11:39 PM.
|TommyT||Jul 19 2012, 11:45 PM Post #6|
Sorry, I'm confused. Hasn't Maxine waters been under investigation for ethics violations at least four different times since 2004?
And wasn't the last accusation (in 2011) spurred by the House Ethics committee? Hasn't the house been controlled by Republicans since 2010?
Can someone explain, logically, how Obama's devious tactics initiated this investigation?
Edited by TommyT, Jul 19 2012, 11:47 PM.
|U Thant||Jul 20 2012, 12:00 AM Post #7|
Obama is like Clarence Thomas, and you and Kenny, in terms of loving-to-assist White racists with annihilating darkskinned Blacks who don't fall for the okie-doke.
so you're entrenched in your irrational stupid shyt here, pretending, that because the House Of Reps enjoy focusing on Blacks for ethics violations, then...a black President who hates for his own Black people to expose him------- won't use the House Of Rep's racism, to his advantage in this way.
Wow you're stupid.
|TommyT||Jul 20 2012, 12:07 AM Post #8|
So basically, you can't even rationally answer my question, so you have to fall back on your tired, "You's a house negro!", rhetoric. LOL!
And racists have a preference on which blacks they want to annihilate? So I guess medium brown/red negros are off the hook then, huh?
Damn, you shole is predictable.
Let me get this straight, you're voting (again) for a president who hates blacks and being associated with them (despite fathering children with and marrying a dark-skinned one); have indicated (several times) that he's trying to destroy Maxine Waters, despite originally claiming that the CBC and Waters were being silenced by the African American voters and thus "complimenting" everything the President does. Here, I'll quote you, since you have a bizarre affinity for contradiction:
Why the President would have to get the assistance of the same Republican House that has tried to vehemently undermine his efforts, just so he can entrench Waters in a legal scandal (despite her-according to you-- already being complicit in all his schemes), is beyond my limited realm of understanding. And when did she reveal that she had that list you mention? Before or after she realized she had black constituents? So is or isn't she Afraid to speak out? You seem incapable of making up your mind on the matter.
Yet, according to you, I'm the one who's "stupid".
BTW, I thought the Bible said not to judge one's brother harshly? Also, didn't you claim insults were beneath, you, since you can easily outwit us simple negros with facts? Yet, the only thing you can say is that, "I'm stupid"? LOL!
I guess you wash away your sins every Sunday, huh?
Edited by TommyT, Jul 20 2012, 12:22 AM.
|U Thant||Jul 20 2012, 12:43 AM Post #9|
angh. wrong answer.
Maxine didn't "say" anything, about Obama, so my philosophy remains titanium-coated in terms of her preaching she did in DET...lol..thx for linking that up, too/helping me expose your idiocy, quicker.
Obama just got mad because Maxine had a list of Black-owned Banks who got shytted on. She didn't say he shytted on them, he just knew that since he did, then his conscience was on edge so he got her brought up on charges.
It's not her fault if Obama's conscience started fuccn with him, like Tommy T's does, whenever someone comes around with proof or evidence which gives credence to the idea that he hates himself for being Black.
|TommyT||Jul 20 2012, 12:58 AM Post #10|
Wrong answer to what? You didn't ask a question. LOL!
Idiocy you say? You're now saying Maxine had no intent of ridiculing Obama? Why then, sir, did you just say this in this very topic? Particularly after I specifically mentioned Waters?
You even you even "bolded" the pertinent part yourself? LMFAO.
Why did you mention Obama having problems with others critiquing him then? If Maxine Waters had no intent of leaking the info, as you now claim (and I reinforced), then why did you bring her up? BTW, if she didn't reveal she had knowledge of Obama ignoring black banks, how did the information leak? Wouldn't it have already been public knowledge? Or are you saying Waters is the only individual/government entity to communicate with black banks?
That's not what you initially said, you specifically referenced to her having a list that indicates Obama shitted on specific banks. Here, I'll quote you again:
LOL. You even used the word "refused".
Weird, so Obama possesses mystical abilities to know when someone posses a list (a list anyone can get a hold of, even Republicans), that they haven't acknowledged possessing? A list that attributes Obama to not doing something deliberately, with holder of said document not actually attributing it to him? Even though the document will point out that Obama was responsible? LOL? So he gets concerned over this readily public knowledge somehow being the hands of one politician ( despite it being public knowledge), and concocts a fiendish plot to destroy her political career over something that's (as we've explained) public knowledge, even though she doesn't plan to use it and it's already public?
Did I get that right?
Edited by TommyT, Jul 20 2012, 01:08 AM.
|1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)|
|Go to Next Page|
|« Previous Topic · Politics & Government · Next Topic »|