Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Let’s Get Serious About Voter Suppression
Topic Started: Jul 19 2012, 01:22 AM (5,156 Views)
Mal

Black Republican
Aug 22 2012, 09:37 PM
Nobody is trying to supress the vote.
WHY DO YOU NEVER COMMENT ABOUT THIS STORY BLACK REPUBLICAN/KENNETH OF A REPUBLICAN WHO ADMITTED IN FLORIDA THAT THE LOCAL GOP WERE TRYING TO SUPPRESS THE BLACK VOTE

http://www.salon.com/2012/07/27/fla_republican_we_suppressed_black_votes/

WHY DO YOU ALSO NOT COMMENT ABOUT THE OHIO REPUBLICAN WHO WAS ALSO CAUGHT ADMITTING THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO SUPPRESS THE BLACK VOTE.

http://www.plunderbund.com/2012/08/19/ohio-republicans-finally-admit-limited-hours-intended-to-suppress-black-voters/
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kennyinbmore
Member Avatar

Veritas
Aug 22 2012, 09:13 PM
What you just said doesn't make one bit of sense blaxx. Tell me what you said in english this time. I mean without all of the codes.
Yeah I read that 5 times, it still sounded like gibberish the 5th time
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The SOLE Controller
Member Avatar

kennyinbmore
Aug 23 2012, 06:48 AM
Yes the truth hurts us as usual, whenever P.O.A.S.S.A. posts. So just do like I do, and tell the same lie over and over that you didn't comprehend what he posted. It helps ease the pain/hurt of how his words cut us phags, so deep, plus it prevents me from commenting on his words/setting myself up to get exposed even more when he reads my dumb fucc reply.

I knew what he meant all along, V.

That muthufukr gets off his azz and gets busy, fighting Racism's evil...while we don't do shyt, but sit on our phaggit asses and covet his styles/show contempt for him in whatever we don't have the courage to join him in doing.






...fixed
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mal

Its about time that the Obama campaign team started talking about voter suppression.
op officials from President Barack Obama's reelection campaign provided assurances on Thursday to Democrats nervous about provisions limiting ballot access that have passed in critical swing states. In the process, they floated the idea that Republicans could be just as affected by some of the controversial measures, which critics have deemed craven efforts at voter suppression.

In a briefing with more than 40 reporters at a hotel in Washington, these officials explained that they had a "much bigger operation than ever before" devoted to executing legal challenges to ballot access measures.

Should those challenges fail, however, the campaign is confident that its on-the-ground operations will allow it to buffer against -- if not overcome -- the hit it could take at the polls.

"I think that all these challenges are why you run a field operation and why, in a battleground state like Ohio, where we have four times as many offices as [the Mitt Romney campaign does] and many times more staffers, we have the advantage to do it," said one senior staffer who spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to speak frankly about campaign strategy. "I know everyone thinks it is just our side that suffers from these things, from ballot access challenges. But their senior voters are going to have challenges too. Both sides are going to have to adapt to this. And I think that is a place where we have an advantage on the ground."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Black Republican
Member Avatar

Nobody is supressing the vote.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mal

Black Republican
Aug 24 2012, 01:42 PM
Nobody is supressing the vote.
Look at Black republican/kenneth he is posting every 5 mins yet he has been pretending that he if off to the RNC in Tampa.
You are at home in your mothers basement eating cheetos Kenneth.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
G. A. W.
Member Avatar

And I used to............ like Cheetos......

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
catdaddy25
Member Avatar

Black Republican
Aug 24 2012, 01:42 PM
Nobody is supressing the vote.
You are just in denial man.I really don't believe you are black also.If support for romney from blacks is zerO why come yours didn't count unless most of you fakes in here are white ???
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mal

The GOP cannot even back up their false claims of voter suppression, keep fighting hard to stop it.

The federal trial over South Carolina's voter identification law got under way Monday with a state senator insisting his work on the law was aimed at fighting fraud and instilling public confidence in the election system.

During morning testimony, state Sen. George "Chip" Campsen III cited examples of fraud that he took into consideration while drafting early versions of South Carolina's law. These included vote buying, voter rolls indicating a woman who showed up at the polls had already voted, and press reports of voters being registered in both South Carolina and North Carolina.

But under questioning from Justice Department attorney Anna Baldwin, Campsen, a Republican, said the examples he gave did not involve the type of fraud that requiring photo identification would address.

"None of the examples you gave in your testimony involved incidents of impersonation?" Baldwin asked.

"Correct," Campsen answered. He also said he could not find cases of voter impersonation in South Carolina, but added that the state lacks the tools to root them out.

The Justice Department rejected South Carolina's law, passed last year, which requires specific photo identification be shown in order to vote. The department decided the law violates Section 5 of the federal Voting Rights Act, which protects minority voters. South Carolina's voter photo ID law was subject to approval from the Justice Department because of its history of racial discrimination.

South Carolina's law was the first voting law to be refused federal clearance in nearly 20 years. South Carolina responded with a lawsuit in the hopes of reinstating the measure.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community.
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply