|
No Muslim country has ever attacked America
|
|
Topic Started: Jan 9 2012, 02:38 PM (1,426 Views)
|
|
bilalian1
|
Jan 11 2012, 08:40 PM
Post #31
|
|
- Posts:
- 3,909
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #162
- Joined:
- Dec 5, 2009
|
- Blaq
- Jan 9 2012, 09:13 PM
- bilalian1
- Jan 9 2012, 08:59 PM
- kennyinbmore
- Jan 9 2012, 03:04 PM
Afghanistan aided the attackers on 9/11, so they asked for it. I'm with you on the whole Iraq thing
They did not aide the 9/11 attackers. They only asked the United States to provide proof that they were involved in the 9/11 attacks. Either way, we shouldn't invaded their country because in the end they will still be in the leadership after we leave. So basically it was a waste of lives, money, and time.
We did not actually attack Afghanistan. We went into Afghanistan to capture what we believed was a possible harbored or hiding fugitive. We asked for Afghanistan's cooperation first but when they acted like they didn't want to move their damn feet we went in ourselves. Our government knew approximately where to find his ass because we'd been keeping tabs on him ever since we killed his father and eldest brother. Do you think we gave a shit about taking over Afghanistan? No. Taking over Afghanistan may have been a remote side deal but it never was the deal. We were to extract bin Laden. The Republicans WERE however poised to take over Iraq. Period. The fact that Obama called the war off the end of last year pissed off a lot of Republicans who had already set up deals to push companies over there to start siphoning that oil. Oh, it's true, it's damn true. Why are we still there if the mission was to get Osama Bin Laden? We didn't need an Army to get him. Our secret forces got him. We invaded their country and are now occupiers of their country. The initial mission was to get Osama, but it changed to include getting the Taliban. That is why we are still there.
|
|
|
| |
|
bilalian1
|
Jan 11 2012, 08:45 PM
Post #32
|
|
- Posts:
- 3,909
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #162
- Joined:
- Dec 5, 2009
|
- zecharia
- Jan 10 2012, 07:21 AM
Most muslim countries are in america's pocket. That is a great point. All of them, except Iran. Some people believe the British control Iran.
|
|
|
| |
|
bilalian1
|
Jan 11 2012, 08:47 PM
Post #33
|
|
- Posts:
- 3,909
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #162
- Joined:
- Dec 5, 2009
|
- kennyinbmore
- Jan 10 2012, 08:15 AM
- bilalian1
- Jan 9 2012, 08:59 PM
- kennyinbmore
- Jan 9 2012, 03:04 PM
Afghanistan aided the attackers on 9/11, so they asked for it. I'm with you on the whole Iraq thing
They did not aide the 9/11 attackers. They only asked the United States to provide proof that they were involved in the 9/11 attacks. Either way, we shouldn't invaded their country because in the end they will still be in the leadership after we leave. So basically it was a waste of lives, money, and time.
Dude wake up. The attackers were known AQ members and AQ was based in Afghanistan. They got what they asked for. End of story no, you wake up. you believe everything the media says?
|
|
|
| |
|
TommyT
|
Jan 11 2012, 09:01 PM
Post #34
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,527
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,106
- Joined:
- Sep 17, 2011
|
- bilalian1
- Jan 11 2012, 08:40 PM
The initial mission was to get Osama, but it changed to include getting the Taliban. Osama is Taliban.
|
|
|
| |
|
bilalian1
|
Jan 11 2012, 09:11 PM
Post #35
|
|
- Posts:
- 3,909
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #162
- Joined:
- Dec 5, 2009
|
- TommyT
- Jan 11 2012, 09:01 PM
- bilalian1
- Jan 11 2012, 08:40 PM
The initial mission was to get Osama, but it changed to include getting the Taliban.
Osama is Taliban. No he's not. He was the head of AQ and the Taliban were ruling that country at the time. Both AQ and the Taliban were allies after fighting the Russians. The United States were also an allie of AQ and the Taliban at the time.
|
|
|
| |
|
n.W.o.
|
Jan 11 2012, 10:05 PM
Post #36
|
|
- Posts:
- 14,159
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,057
- Joined:
- Aug 16, 2011
|
- bilalian1
- Jan 11 2012, 08:40 PM
- Blaq
- Jan 9 2012, 09:13 PM
- bilalian1
- Jan 9 2012, 08:59 PM
- kennyinbmore
- Jan 9 2012, 03:04 PM
Afghanistan aided the attackers on 9/11, so they asked for it. I'm with you on the whole Iraq thing
They did not aide the 9/11 attackers. They only asked the United States to provide proof that they were involved in the 9/11 attacks. Either way, we shouldn't invaded their country because in the end they will still be in the leadership after we leave. So basically it was a waste of lives, money, and time.
We did not actually attack Afghanistan. We went into Afghanistan to capture what we believed was a possible harbored or hiding fugitive. We asked for Afghanistan's cooperation first but when they acted like they didn't want to move their damn feet we went in ourselves. Our government knew approximately where to find his ass because we'd been keeping tabs on him ever since we killed his father and eldest brother. Do you think we gave a shit about taking over Afghanistan? No. Taking over Afghanistan may have been a remote side deal but it never was the deal. We were to extract bin Laden. The Republicans WERE however poised to take over Iraq. Period. The fact that Obama called the war off the end of last year pissed off a lot of Republicans who had already set up deals to push companies over there to start siphoning that oil. Oh, it's true, it's damn true.
Why are we still there if the mission was to get Osama Bin Laden? We didn't need an Army to get him. Our secret forces got him. We invaded their country and are now occupiers of their country. The initial mission was to get Osama, but it changed to include getting the Taliban. That is why we are still there. I'm not a General or a politician. Here is a link for you to watch of a General explaining your question.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/afghanistan--14693291
|
|
|
| |
|
TommyT
|
Jan 11 2012, 10:20 PM
Post #37
|
|
- Posts:
- 5,527
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,106
- Joined:
- Sep 17, 2011
|
- bilalian1
- Jan 11 2012, 09:11 PM
- TommyT
- Jan 11 2012, 09:01 PM
- bilalian1
- Jan 11 2012, 08:40 PM
The initial mission was to get Osama, but it changed to include getting the Taliban.
Osama is Taliban.
No he's not. He was the head of AQ and the Taliban were ruling that country at the time. Both AQ and the Taliban were allies after fighting the Russians. The United States were also an allie of AQ and the Taliban at the time. But isn't AQ an offshoot of the teachings passed down by the Taliban?
|
|
|
| |
|
Zechariah
|
Jan 11 2012, 10:27 PM
Post #38
|
|
Zechariah
- Posts:
- 25,169
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #563
- Joined:
- Jun 24, 2010
|
- bilalian1
- Jan 11 2012, 08:40 PM
- Blaq
- Jan 9 2012, 09:13 PM
- bilalian1
- Jan 9 2012, 08:59 PM
- kennyinbmore
- Jan 9 2012, 03:04 PM
Afghanistan aided the attackers on 9/11, so they asked for it. I'm with you on the whole Iraq thing
They did not aide the 9/11 attackers. They only asked the United States to provide proof that they were involved in the 9/11 attacks. Either way, we shouldn't invaded their country because in the end they will still be in the leadership after we leave. So basically it was a waste of lives, money, and time.
We did not actually attack Afghanistan. We went into Afghanistan to capture what we believed was a possible harbored or hiding fugitive. We asked for Afghanistan's cooperation first but when they acted like they didn't want to move their damn feet we went in ourselves. Our government knew approximately where to find his ass because we'd been keeping tabs on him ever since we killed his father and eldest brother. Do you think we gave a shit about taking over Afghanistan? No. Taking over Afghanistan may have been a remote side deal but it never was the deal. We were to extract bin Laden. The Republicans WERE however poised to take over Iraq. Period. The fact that Obama called the war off the end of last year pissed off a lot of Republicans who had already set up deals to push companies over there to start siphoning that oil. Oh, it's true, it's damn true.
Why are we still there if the mission was to get Osama Bin Laden? We didn't need an Army to get him. Our secret forces got him. We invaded their country and are now occupiers of their country. The initial mission was to get Osama, but it changed to include getting the Taliban. That is why we are still there. I take it you're not aware that the Taliban are once again america's ally?
|
|
|
| |
|
Zechariah
|
Jan 11 2012, 10:29 PM
Post #39
|
|
Zechariah
- Posts:
- 25,169
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #563
- Joined:
- Jun 24, 2010
|
- bilalian1
- Jan 11 2012, 08:45 PM
- zecharia
- Jan 10 2012, 07:21 AM
Most muslim countries are in america's pocket.
That is a great point. All of them, except Iran. Some people believe the British control Iran. I qualified it by stating that "most" are, and most are.
|
|
|
| |
|
DeShawn
|
Jan 11 2012, 11:08 PM
Post #40
|
|
- Posts:
- 3,408
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,203
- Joined:
- Dec 11, 2011
|
- Muhammad
- Jan 9 2012, 02:38 PM
No Muslim country has ever invaded or attacked America. But America has invaded 2 Muslims countries. America invaded Iraq and killed innocent people, and America invaded Libya and killed innocent people. Now the bastards in the U.S. Government are talking about attacking Iran. You are right and that's why Ron Paul is against America invading other countries.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|