Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Why are black men turning to homosexuality?; What has happened to the black man?
Topic Started: Feb 25 2011, 02:43 PM (4,228 Views)
negroplease

kennyinbmore
Mar 10 2011, 03:14 PM
shutupalready
Mar 10 2011, 02:18 PM
LOL!

Don't agree with me Kenny, people will think we are the same person. Again

Heh heh . I'm an atheist, there's something we probably don't agree on
Agnostic!


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kennyinbmore
Member Avatar

shutupalready
Mar 10 2011, 03:47 PM
kennyinbmore
Mar 10 2011, 03:14 PM
shutupalready
Mar 10 2011, 02:18 PM
LOL!

Don't agree with me Kenny, people will think we are the same person. Again

Heh heh . I'm an atheist, there's something we probably don't agree on
Agnostic!


lol pretty damn close
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Doctor Magnus Warlock
Member Avatar

kennyinbmore
Mar 10 2011, 04:03 PM
shutupalready
Mar 10 2011, 03:47 PM
kennyinbmore
Mar 10 2011, 03:14 PM
shutupalready
Mar 10 2011, 02:18 PM
LOL!

Don't agree with me Kenny, people will think we are the same person. Again

Heh heh . I'm an atheist, there's something we probably don't agree on
Agnostic!


lol pretty damn close
I'm such a tweener. Some days I feel agnostic, other days I feel atheist. Does this make me Bi?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
memdear70
Member Avatar

kennyinbmore
Mar 9 2011, 10:53 AM
sudo
Mar 9 2011, 01:47 AM
Given the tone of this forum, your title and title description sounded "Why are black men turning to homosexuality?; What has happened to the black man?", like you were likely shocked and disappointed that there were black males who were gay. Your actual post made it seem like these black gay men were somehow more disgusting than the supposed black gay women in the threads we have here. You also make it sound like "real love" is something only a man and a woman can have. "Hate" may be a strong word, but judging by your first post you certainly didn't seem to approve of what you saw, and possibly believe that gay aren't capable of loving one another.

To answer a previous post you made, I really don't think that vast, vast majority of gays choose to be so, whether from experimentation or otherwise. Why would anyone choose to be treated like less of a person both in a social and legal sense? Moreover, why would someone decide that they never want to have sex with someone of the opposite sex again?

The ones I've talked to always knew they were different, even if they didn't know they were gay. I think it's more likely that, especially now, the option to experiment is there and there's less issue with relationships outside of heterosexuality. So people experiment. Some of those people decide they like being with people of both sexes to some degree. Bisexuality is probably more common than homosexuality, but it's talked about far less. There's other reasons someone would experiment, such as abuse, low self esteem or living situations, but I really don't think those are leading causes.

Also, while I think I understand what people mean by the "gay lifestyle", it doesn't exist any more than the "black lifestyle" does. They go to work, eat dinner, hang out with friends and do whatever else other people do. Most things gays are doing aren't inherently gay.
Well said my friend. I knew it wasn't just me that picked up her tone
All I can say at this point is, apparently I don't understand the group of people who choose this path to happiness, as well as I thought I did. I have thought about what Kenny and Sudo have stated and I'm still missing something. I can't find the tone nor can I see the hate referenced. After thinking about it the only thing I can say is I over-reacted to the video's I saw, and I guess I was disappointed to see more of our black men going that direction but I don't feel that that statement displays hate in my book. But I am curious as to why this topic and the way it was presented has caused such a riff. I started out asking a question and my thoughts were, at the time, there are at least 4 separate topic headings on this board related to Lesbian relationships but nothing said about the Males and their alternate choices, so why not discuss what I just saw.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mister J
Member Avatar

shutupalready
Mar 10 2011, 02:23 PM
... have you not noticed I am antagonizing you?


By the way Malaika is not my real name, I would never disclose that to strangers on the net... So I wanted absolutely nothing!
Malaika!
The case is closed.
What do you want, an Appeal??
It's a lil' late in the game to change-up your testimony.
You had every opportunity to tell it STRAIGHT and HONESTLY, the FIRST time -- But you did not.
If you had TRULY given a bogus name, it would not have taken you THIS long to announce that.
You would've come out with it the very FIRST time I stated that you gave up your 'real' name.
At the time, you were looking for any angle you could use to sway readers to accept your version of those PM's.
And if you had not disclosed a proper name, you damn sure would've come out and said so!

But you got that "bright" idea as an AFTER thought to avoid being tagged with your proper name, Malaika, and attempt to clean-up the sloppy lies you told.

Don't fret too much about it.
Just remember, it was you who insisted you had nothing to hide, by revealing the PMs.

So why try to hide that part?
Edited by Mister J, Mar 10 2011, 11:34 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mister J
Member Avatar

sam_wilson
Mar 10 2011, 02:33 PM
Most people who are against homosexuality do so for "moral" reasons. I could actually see a religious freak like Marcus making your arguments. But for you, Mr. playa-pimp who brags about all the tail at your disposal to be so strongly against it makes you look hypocritical. You don't have the moral high ground to criticize anybody's sexual lifestyle. All the additional posting of you justifying your behavior with SUA was too odd to comment on. The only person who offered you succor was Azucar of all people. My position still stands that I would never flirt with a woman who claims to be married. Because if she really is married, and her hubby finds out, you just earned a truckload of drama. You wanted to know her real name, and you wanted pictures. For all you know, some of your exchanges with her could have actually been her husband. Or, he could have been next to her as she was pming you. I was surprised that you would even invite that kind of drama. If we go by the Bible, adultery is a sin (ask poor King David). Whoremongering is frowned upon in the Bible also (ask poor Samson).
What age are you? Because your comments here suggest that you are a passive, somewhat timid, soft-minded, nearly burnt-out, middle-age-to-senior citizen, moralizing 'sheep'.

And here's why:

(1) You made a equal, [moral] comparison of having a number of HETEROsexual partners, with HOMOSEXUAL activity -- There's is no 'moral' comparison because the two activities are not, at all, in the same category.
And if you think the two are... your mind is probably light-weight & 'soft'.

(2) You hypothesize and imagine all sorts of scary scenarios taking place behind two [assumed] adults... who may be THOUSANDS of miles apart... WILLFULLY talking to one another... in the Personal Message section... of damn ANONYMOUS message board... without breaking any LAWS of the land... and for their MUTUAL gratification (or whatever).
And you can't put that shyt in proper context and perspective??

(3) Or on the flip side... I could have a jealous, crazy-azzed female partner in my life, as well, who bring 'drama' to other females for engaging and indulging her man in intimate communication that might lead to an actual 'hook-up'.
And, yes, there are women who can do some real dirty, nasty shyt, when striking out at ya.
Since the potential for that to go down is almost as likely as the jealous 'hubby'... why the phuck did you not criticize and 'call her out', as well, for WILLFULLY participating in that intimate chat???
After all, SHE'S the one supposably, "married".

(and a side-lesson for you men is: the FIRST & ONLY ass you should be willing kick is your woman's... Because THAT's the bitch who violated your trust and the honor of your relationship agreement- NOT the STRANGER (man), who don't even know your azz, much less have any obligation to you).

(4) And another thing that apparently escapes your perception, Sam, is that the status of being "married" is the not the benchmark for when, and if, a mofo will get violently jealous.
Most of the violence involving relationship 'triangles' happens among people who don't even have a marriage certificate.
So, "married", or not, some guy can still get pissed and come kick your passive, timid ass.

What will you say then?
Edited by Mister J, Mar 11 2011, 11:42 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Doctor Magnus Warlock
Member Avatar

Mister J
Mar 11 2011, 11:17 AM
sam_wilson
Mar 10 2011, 02:33 PM
Most people who are against homosexuality do so for "moral" reasons. I could actually see a religious freak like Marcus making your arguments. But for you, Mr. playa-pimp who brags about all the tail at your disposal to be so strongly against it makes you look hypocritical. You don't have the moral high ground to criticize anybody's sexual lifestyle. All the additional posting of you justifying your behavior with SUA was too odd to comment on. The only person who offered you succor was Azucar of all people. My position still stands that I would never flirt with a woman who claims to be married. Because if she really is married, and her hubby finds out, you just earned a truckload of drama. You wanted to know her real name, and you wanted pictures. For all you know, some of your exchanges with her could have actually been her husband. Or, he could have been next to her as she was pming you. I was surprised that you would even invite that kind of drama. If we go by the Bible, adultery is a sin (ask poor King David). Whoremongering is frowned upon in the Bible also (ask poor Samson).
Your comments here suggest that you are a passive, somewhat timid, soft-minded, nearly burnt-out, middle-age-to-senior citizen, moralizing 'sheep'.

And here's why:

(1) You made a equal, [moral] comparison of having a number of HETEROsexual partners, with HOMOSEXUAL activity -- There's is no 'moral' comparison because the two activities are not, at all, in the same category.
And if you think the two are... your mind is probably light-weight & 'soft'.

(2) You hypothesize and imagine all sorts of scary scenarios taking place behind two [assumed] adults... who may be THOUSANDS of miles apart... WILLFULLY talking to one another... in the Personal Message section... of damn ANONYMOUS message board... without breaking any LAWS of the land... and for their MUTUAL gratification (or whatever).
And you can't put that shyt in proper context and perspective??

(3) Or on the flip side... I could have a jealous, crazy-azzed female partner in my life, as well, who bring 'drama' to other females for engaging and indulging her man in intimate communication that might lead to an actual 'hook-up'.
And, yes, there are women who can do some real dirty, nasty shyt, when striking out at ya.
Since the potential for that to go down is almost as likely as the jealous 'hubby'... why the phuck did you not criticize and 'call her out', as well, for WILLFULLY participating in that intimate chat???
After all, SHE'S the one supposably, "married".

(and a side-lesson for you men is: the FIRST & ONLY ass you should be willing kick is your woman's... Because THAT's the bitch who violated your trust and the honor of your relationship agreement- NOT the STRANGER (man), who don't even know your azz, much less have any obligation to you).

(4) And another thing that apparently escapes your perception, Sam, is that the status of being "married" is the not the benchmark for when, and if, a mofo will get violently jealous.
Most of the violence involving relationship 'triangles' happens among people who don't even have a marriage certificate.
So, "married", or not, some guy can still get pissed and come kick your passive, timid ass.

What will you say then?
Hot Damn. You really put alot of effort into this. Ok, here is my response. Wait for it. Brace yourself.

Yawn.

You know, you should have been a FBI profiler. Like a true keyboard chemist, you broke me down to my very last compound. Mr. Macho Man, you seem to be the type who likes to get the last word to make yourself feel good. Most people here just state their opinions, whether they make sense, or are simply misguided. You are one of the few who feels the need to present himself as this great alpha male with the strong pimp hand. That is why the "PM saga" was so funny. Because if the backstory you presented was true, you never would have entertained SUA in the first place. Based on some of your previous posts, you got way too many females half your age wanting to get at you. I never said anything about a scary husband. I did say drama. Drama can take many forms. Most times romantic drama can be annoying, and bothersome.

I will not comment any further, because I do not want to hijack the original topic. I called you a joke because of your insatiable need to demonstrate your manhood at every opportunity. That is why some folks here are laughing at your comments about this topic. Your need to respond to every slight to your ego says alot about you. I would rather not add more fuel to the fire.

Reply to this however you wish.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kennyinbmore
Member Avatar

memdear70
Mar 10 2011, 08:17 PM
All I can say at this point is, apparently I don't understand the group of people who choose this path to happiness, as well as I thought I did. I have thought about what Kenny and Sudo have stated and I'm still missing something. I can't find the tone nor can I see the hate referenced. After thinking about it the only thing I can say is I over-reacted to the video's I saw, and I guess I was disappointed to see more of our black men going that direction but I don't feel that that statement displays hate in my book.
Speaking for Kenny, I'll repeat what someone else said earlier. That maybe Hate is a strong word. That being said, why would you be disappointed about someone else's sexual preference?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kennyinbmore
Member Avatar

Mister J
Mar 10 2011, 09:33 PM
Malaika!
The case is closed.
What do you want, an Appeal??
It's a lil' late in the game to change-up your testimony.
You had every opportunity to tell it STRAIGHT and HONESTLY, the FIRST time -- But you did not.
If you had TRULY given a bogus name, it would not have taken you THIS long to announce that.
You would've come out with it the very FIRST time I stated that you gave up your 'real' name.
At the time, you were looking for any angle you could use to sway readers to accept your version of those PM's.
And if you had not disclosed a proper name, you damn sure would've come out and said so!

But you got that "bright" idea as an AFTER thought to avoid being tagged with your proper name, Malaika, and attempt to clean-up the sloppy lies you told.

Don't fret too much about it.
Just remember, it was you who insisted you had nothing to hide, by revealing the PMs.

So why try to hide that part?
Let me guess. You've got a major crush on her :D :D
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mister J
Member Avatar

^^ Ahhh, Sam, don't take it so seriously, buddy.

Meany ol' me didn't mean any harm.

I was just play-sparring with cha.

But, yer right, I do have something of a 'Type-A' personality.
I can't help it.
It runs on the male side of my family.

But don't let it keep ya from giving me a coupla jabs, here & there, to help keep me in good [message board] shape.

Also, what age are you?... because if you're over sixty y/o, then I'll have to make a respectful allowance for that... as that stage of life is suppose to come with a certain level of respect and deference.

Talk to you next time.

Edited by Mister J, Mar 11 2011, 12:29 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Dating & Relationships · Next Topic »
Add Reply