|
Franco-Belgian Alliance / PCA Thread
|
|
Topic Started: Dec 6 2015, 06:29 PM (83 Views)
|
|
Empire of Japan
|
Dec 6 2015, 06:29 PM
Post #1
|
|
- Posts:
- 83
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #25
- Joined:
- Nov 23, 2015
|
The PCA did not include any of the involved nations until 1907.
|
|
|
| |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
Dec 6 2015, 07:42 PM
Post #2
|
|
- Posts:
- 162
- Group:
- Admins
- Member
- #1
- Joined:
- Jun 7, 2010
|
Eh, it can be handled as an international arbitration of some kind even if that particular court did not seat those nations.
|
|
|
| |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
Dec 6 2015, 08:19 PM
Post #3
|
|
- Posts:
- 162
- Group:
- Admins
- Member
- #1
- Joined:
- Jun 7, 2010
|
If necessary JBK can edit the topics so as to make it composed of a panel of judges from each nation, similar to how the Canadian-Alaskan boundary dispute was handled.
|
|
|
| |
|
German Empire
|
Dec 6 2015, 09:56 PM
Post #4
|
|
- Posts:
- 34
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #23
- Joined:
- Nov 23, 2015
- Nation
- German Empire
|
The Court had been established and the nations involved did sign part of the 1899 Hague convention. We could assume for simplicity's stake that the agreement of all nations who were involved in the process to be involved automatically would have also made them members of the PCA?
|
|
|
| |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
Dec 6 2015, 09:59 PM
Post #5
|
|
- Posts:
- 162
- Group:
- Admins
- Member
- #1
- Joined:
- Jun 7, 2010
|
I'm fine with it staying the way it is. If you want to change it for RP purposes, that is fine too. I am quite agreeable to anything. 
None of it changes the force of the story, which is that the matter has gone to international arbitration.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|