| Welcome to Edl The Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Interview with Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels- Inability of Muslims to assimilate | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 22 2010, 10:03 AM (66 Views) | |
| Deleted User | Dec 22 2010, 10:03 AM Post #1 |
|
Deleted User
|
Interview with Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels- Inability of Muslims to assimilate (Part 1) (You can contact Nicolai Sennels at: nicolaisennels@gmail.com Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels worked in Sonderbro, Copenhagen with young criminals -150 Muslims and 100 Danish and as a result of his work, wrote ‘Among Criminal Muslims: a psychologist’s experience from the Copenhagen Municipality.” 70% of Copenhagen’s prison population is of Muslim heritage. While Nicolai agrees that personal and social problems can lead to anti-social behaviour, he noted particular traits (deep psychological differences) for Muslim offenders which differed from non-Muslims and seem related both to their Muslim culture and criminality. Muslims, even those not attending a mosque or second or third generation, still identified strongly with Muslim ‘culture’ and opposed western culture and values. He concluded that the mental mindset or psychological profile of Muslims makes it virtually impossible for them to assimilate –and they don’t want to anyway. “People hope that most Muslims are modern and accept western values. My experience is different and this has been proved by the statistics in Europe’ (Sennels in Struening 2009) Sennels points to the Muslim religion as a source of criminality. Poverty is not to blame, but instead Sennels suggests, it is their anti-social behaviour and attitudes which can make them poor, not the other way around! He exposes the myth of a low % of extremists/fundamentalists. From his research, Sennels believes the dream of integrating Muslims has no foundation in reality and “integration to the necessary degree of Muslims is NOT possible.’ (Sennels 2010 b, Strueing 2009, Glasov 2010a) Billions have been spent on integration but the problems GROW. Initially he believed integration was simply a matter of time and that social injustice was responsible for ethnic tensions, but close personal experience of Muslim and non-Muslim offenders changed his mind. (Hommaforum 2009) Sennels notes the fundamental differences between western and Muslim societies and the fact that Muslims must undergo big changes to their identity and leave many of their core values to accept the values of a western society. The majority simply cannot do this, particularly as they are also despised (and threatened) by other Muslims for leaving Islam. He notes that those with a vested interest in ‘multiculturalism’ or leftist politics attempt to hide the truth but that the person in the street knows what is happening to our countries and that people should express their concerns over Muslim immigration and integration at every opportunity (Hommaforum 2009, Sennels 2010 b) He believes Muslim immigration must stop. Interview with Nicolai Sennels: Circe: In Australia, in areas where they have the numbers Muslims are demanding political power and pro-Islamic political candidates. Q: Is this apparent sense that they are superior and special and require different treatment to others part of the mental mindset that makes it impossible for Muslims to assimilate? Sennels: There are two reasons for this. First of all Muslim voters hope that Muslim politicians and influential Muslim leaders and organisations will be able to change our society to fit with Muslim culture and Islam. This is called “Islamization” and is a quite successful movement all over the West - enabled by socialist politicians and politically correct journalists. In Denmark all kindergartens in Copenhagen only serve halal-food and we allow Islamic calls on Fridays from minarets all over our country. Around half of our schools now allow Muslim pupils holidays on Islamic holidays - and these holidays are marked in the official calendar for school teachers. There are many more examples and few realize that we now have certain parts of the Sharia laws fully implemented in our secular and democratic countries. The strongest sign of success of Sharia in non-Islamic parts of the world is the fact that many politicians and media have been convinced, pressured or scared to abstain from criticism of Islam, their prophet and Muslim immigration. The other reason for gaining political power and promoting and endorsing Muslim or pro-Islamic political candidates is, that by far most Muslims respect Islamic authorities more than non-Islamic authorities. In Denmark and most other Western countries we have Muslim parallel societies where secular authorities such as the police, fire fighters and representatives of the state (e.g. tax men) are taunted, threatened and often even attacked. While this tendency grows every month, Islamic preachers (imams), organised vigilante in the form of homemade Sharia courts and patrolling police-like groups of elderly Muslim men, are free to exert their power and authority in these areas. Such developments are a direct and conscious attack on our democracies. And I am sure that they are the first steps towards a functioning political infra-structure that will lay the ground for demands for autonomous Islamic areas when a strong feeling of power appears among the common Muslims is combined with the appearance of charismatic Islamic leaders in the different areas. Q: What should be the response of political parties to such demands if they truly aim to protect our open, egalitarian democracy and our laws? Sennels: We have to deny any shade of Islamisation. We should never allow Islamists who do not accept our culture and values to influence them. We should only give religious freedom for religions and religious movements that publicly denounce violent and hateful verses in their holy books. And we should insist on the fact that our countries have a Christian heritage and that our churches, Christian symbols and traditions have more rights in our societies and laws. I should mention that I am not Christian myself but exceedingly thankful for the way Christianity - after being reformed - has pushed our civilization forward. We have to insist on freedom of speech and we should regularly demonstrate our rights to criticise religions etc. Many politicians are fully aware of the problems but are too cowardly to speak out. Much of the media are partly owned by oil money and under the influence of political correctness. Therefore it is exceedingly important that we have people who dare to say their opinion and who work hard to spread the necessary facts about Islam and the negative consequences of Muslim immigration. Only in this way can we show our fellow citizens and voters the truth and convince our mostly popularist politicians that they can be sure to gain votes if they go against Islam and decide on tougher immigration laws. Q: In Australia, Muslims already demand sharia, separate Muslim housing developments and special everything. A child has marched through Melbourne streets carrying a genocide to Jews sign – without consequence! We live under threats of legal action for daring to criticise Islam and we have a pro-Islam leftist Labor party in government----- From your experience, where are we headed if we fail to stop this progression of Islam? Sennels: Because of tens of millions of Muslims' exodus to the West and the enormous amounts of Arab money that are put into our media, big companies and lobby activity, it will not be easy nor quick to change these developments. Unfortunately, the Left, who fought hardest for true democracy, women’s rights and against religious fanaticism in the previous century have now turned out to be a helpful ally for the greatest anti-democratic, women suppressing and fanatical force in this world. I am sure that the current struggle that Islam and Muslims are now leading against the non-Muslims will be compared to the first two World Wars by future historians. For the democratic side of the conflict – the West – it is still mostly a war of information. We simply have to get the necessary historical, religious and statistical facts on crime etc. out to the common voter. If we do not manage that, because we were lazy, scared or egotistical, we will lose. Everybody is welcome to read the Quran or find out by which means Islam managed to grow from a small desert kingdom to cover 52 countries and have 1.5 billion followers. Then you will get an idea about how resolute our attacker is and what it takes to stop it. It will be a close race but I have confidence that an aroused democracy is stronger and fights more fiercely than fanatics led by ‘insanes.’ The big question is: How many of our freedoms and rights do we need to give up in order to win? And will we be able to do it without hate and thus avoid destroying our basically friendly culture that we are trying to protect? Q: Given that Muslims cannot assimilate (share our values and vision of society) but aim to implement an alternate Islamic society and legal system (treason to our society), should they be banned from holding any political position? Sennels: There is no doubt that many Muslim politicians are using our democracy to destroy democracy. "One man, one vote, one time" as they say. But I see signs of political awareness among the voters and still more and more politicians that is convincing me that the total destruction of democracy will not happen. We should of course forbid Islamic symbols such as the veil for people employed by the state, e.g. judges, nurses etc. What we need to work on is creating a fair press and good blogs that can disclose any hidden agenda and unwholesome connections that our politicians and political candidates may have. Here readers' letters have proven to be a very strong force in the European media. Denmark is the tip of the spear when it comes to fighting for freedom of speech and implementing strict immigration laws. Besides the typical Danish tendency not to take angry people seriously, it is exactly the many anti-Islamic letters sent to our newspapers editors that have made Denmark what it is today in the fight for freedom. We should all write letters to the newspapers. Even if they do not print the letter we send a message to the editors: Their readers have great interest in the subject and if they want to keep their readers and keep selling newspapers they better start treating the subject honestly and taking their costumers seriously. We have a case where the school's bully is gaining power for the single reason that the rest of the children are too lazy or scared to stand up together and speak their mind. Circe: From your interviews, are Muslims interested in integrating/assimilating or do they expect society to alter to suit their demands? Sennels: The vast majority of Muslims will never integrate, and nor will their off spring. The reason is that all Muslims are filtered – excuse me the expression – by three things. They have to want to integrate, they have to be allowed to and they have to be able to. First we have to ask ourselves: Why should Muslims want to integrate? They are sure to have food, a home, schools for their children, health care for their families, no matter if they learn our languages, take an education, accept our values and get a job – or not. There is no risk that Muslims will feel lonely or isolated if they do not become part of our societies. All Western countries today have dozens and some even hundreds of Muslim parallel societies, where unintegrated Muslims can live among other Muslims. Here they can speak their own mother tongue and live and share their Muslim culture, religion, values etc. with the likeminded. Secondly it is important to know that Muslim culture and Islam in particular is characterized by an all pervading social control. Only a tiny minority of Muslims have true human rights because of the many restrictions within Islam and Muslim traditions. Very few are really free to chose their own sexual partners, clothing style, eating and drinking habits, religion and general life style. Islamic rules and Muslim cultural values in so many areas are so different, and often even opposite, to modern Western living. Muslims thus need to leave several cultural and religious core values and rules of behaviour if they want to integrate into our societies. This is simply not accepted in most Muslim families and communities and as they say in Japan: Nails that stick out will be hammered in. We do not need many threats, beatings, house arrests, kidnappings, “educational travels” to Muslim homelands, or killings – all in the name of some misunderstood concept of honour – before the majority are too scared or brainwashed to break free. Thirdly it is simply difficult to integrate into our high tech knowledge societies. People have to learn a completely new language, take high level education and manage often advanced jobs in order to be able to support themselves. On top of this Muslim immigrants have to embrace such things as equality of women and non-Muslims, and free sexuality and speech that are so far from the norm in Islamic societies that the psychological jump is too far – or too hard - to make. Staying with what one has been taught is true and right from birth – and what one’s family and friends want one to be – is far easier, more convenient and safe. Circe: What aspects of Islamic culture/Muslim mindset makes Muslims enter, then set about destroying the host country? Sennels: The most obvious reason for Muslims to travel to the West is that while their own culture has not managed to produce free and rich countries, our Western culture of freedom and capitalism has. Some also see it as part of their religious duty to spread Islam via exodus and high birth rates – which has been the Muslim tradition for centuries and is ordered in Islam’s holy scriptures as a mean to spread Allah's rule worldwide. I do not think that the average Muslim wants to destroy the host country, they just want to change it. It is a completely normal human reaction to want to change one’s surroundings so it fits with one’s values and wishes. And exactly because it is basic human nature it is extremely difficult – probably impossible in by far the most cases– to change. Of course many Muslims have a significant amount of hate towards the West and non-Muslims, whom they blame for so much. For this group destruction is of course a goal in itself. Circe: An Australian cleric calls for the beheading of Geert Wilders. Across the Islamic world the followers of other religions have their people killed, their daughters raped, their homes and businesses torched, their religious sites attacked, their texts destroyed and are relegated to the lowest jobs and the lowest social position while we say nothing. A pastor says he will burn a Koran and we become hysterical condemning his actions, his insensitivity and provocation etc. Can you provide some insights into OUR ‘mindset’ that allows us to ignore Islamic atrocities everywhere, while we deny free speech and even condemn those who dare to speak against or challenge Islam? Sennels: I think that many are basically not able to understand the childishness of our opponents. We think that if we give them what they want, they will stop their embarrassing screaming, immature threats and helpless argumentation. But they don’t, and I think that more and more Westerners are waking up to that fact. I also think that the two World Wars hurt us a lot on the cultural psychological level. Being proud of one’s culture and the record amount of people it has made free, safe and rich is often confused with Nazi-like nationalism, which it of course is not. Finally I see that a certain academic theory called systemic thinking has eaten the brains of a lot of our academic elite. The theory of systemic thinking is dominating our universities and schools for teachers and educators and it has two main messages. First it is the basis for so-called cultural relativism that claims that all cultures are equal- whatever value you have it is "just another discourse." Secondly it states that people’s behaviour is mainly decided by outside influences. Both allegations are wrong and unhealthy for human development. Just like every family has a culture that influences the family members, so do religions have a certain influence on its adherents. Some families are healthier to grow up in than others, because they simply influence its members in a more positive way. Thus not all families are equal, and the same goes for all other kinds of cultures, including religious cultures. Secondly we people have much more power over our own lives than many think. Our free will and ability to pull oneself together is definitely underestimated in our too big nanny states. Our choice of how to view things, our way of handling our emotions, the way we choose to communicate etc. are all ways in which we ourselves create our own happiness and suffering - and give our life direction and content. It is unconstructive and is in no way helpful for the individual person to blame people’s surroundings for people’s own behaviour. When a hundred people are trampled to death during a demonstration against the Muhammed drawings, it is not the artist's fault, nor the newspaper that printed the drawing. When Muslim immigrants choose crime and parallel societies instead of integration, it is not society's fault. It is their own choice. We can call it the psychopath argument: A violent husband tells the psychologist that his wife knows exactly which "buttons" to press to make him angry and beat her - and still she presses the buttons. "She is asking for it!", the husbands says. But of course she is not. Many Muslims and leftists argue the same way as the psychopathic husband. Systemic theory is the main reason for the popularization of this kind of thinking and it is influencing our societies through the back door through our education and multiplicators (teachers). Circe: Our ‘leftist’ political leaders, academics, media and even religious leaders seem incapable of fighting for the rights and freedoms of others –females, non-Muslims, homosexuals etc in the Islamic world where these ‘rights’ simply don’t exist. Are they paralysed because to dare to criticise Islam and the Islamic world which adheres to Islam’s text and laws, would imply that our values and society are better, so they ignore Islam’s abuses because the ‘left’s’ reason for existence, their identity, is hatred for our society? Sennels: I do not think that they hate their own culture and societies. But I think they are afraid of being called arrogant by their own. The general style of communication among leftists is often very hard and condemning. Besides that I simply think that the Muslims managed to scare them. The Left is also very afraid to sound politically incorrect, and this robs them of the ability to joke about things. A good laugh is a healthy way to shake off fear and being without this tool, one is an easy prey for people who get their nourishment from intimidating others. On top, socialism prioritizes equality over freedom and being richer or better -including having a more functioning culture producing more functioning individuals - (which) is simply embarassing for many socialists. Circe: We have Islamic schools popping up everywhere. Children are segregated from Australian society and trained in Islam. From your research among criminal Muslims: Q: What are the psychological implications for a child trained in an Islamic school? Sennels: Nobody learns as fast and as much as children. Children’s brains are simply more open to new imprints and their dependency on their parents and authorities in general makes it easier to influence their patterns of behaviour and thinking. Whatever is learned during childhood is exceedingly difficult to change later in life. If children e.g. have learned certain views that are contradictory to Western values it will be almost impossible to change them later in life. Just like westerners, many Muslims are not aware that they act and perceive according to certain values. Many only discover these true beliefs when they realise that these beliefs are challenged or under attack. But if children learn that every word in the Quran is true and the human example of their prophet is to be admired and followed, it is definitely harmful for their capacity to find happiness and harmony later in life. Their surroundings will suffer consequently. b) What is the potential impact on the wider society of Muslim children trained in Islamic schools? Sennels: It depends what they learn in these schools. Islamic schools that tell the pupils that the Quran is the unchangeable words of God are actually madrassas. Such madrassas are widespread in the Middle East, Pakistan and Afghanistan, and seen from a psychological point of view they function as factories producing Islamic fanatics by the hundreds of thousands. Circe: In Australia we are constantly told of the ‘plurality’ of Islam yet your research with Muslims from across the Muslim world shows clear common characteristics derived from Islam’s ‘culture’ (based on Islam’s text, Mohammad’s example and Islam’s laws) found for both religious Muslims and those not attached to a mosque , regardless of country of origin.(Glasov 2010a) “I did not register any major differences between the mentalities between these countries” (Middle East, Africa, Pakistan, ex-Yugoslavia..) “Seen from the therapy room, “the mentality stemming from Islamic influence on the societies where it is the dominating value system is so strongly rooted in the culture that Muslims are influenced by its dogmas and values no matter if they pray five times a day and can recite the Quran or not” Can you give us a summary of the core of attitudes as they relate to -- women, infidels, anger, locus of control, honour, self-reflection and consequence, empathy and remorse. Sennels: I found four psychological characteristics that define the Muslim clients from the non-Muslims. The first concerns anger. The fastest way to lose face in the West - and by the way also in Far East cultures - is clear expressions of anger. We are taught that anger is bad. We train ourselves, parents train their children and societies train their citizens to be able to handle conflicts peacefully and without the use of aggression. While it was clear that my non-Muslim clients knew that anger is basically a problem, the Muslim clients saw anger and the readiness and courage to use threats and violence as a strength. Aggression is simply much more accepted within the Muslim culture. This is not surprising - all cultures cultivate a certain view on emotions. The fastest way to lose face in the Muslim culture is thus to not show aggression when attacked or criticised. Our Western way of handling conflicts through compromises and diplomacy is therefore seen as a sign of weakness and lack of fighting power that invites exploitation. Another difference concerns honour and self confidence. In most non-Muslim cultures it is seen as honourable if we can handle criticism objectively and without being emotionally disturbed. We listen to the criticism and we try to appreciate the critic's positive motivation of trying to help us avoid and eliminate mistakes. If we agree with the criticism we are thankful and try to change accordingly. If we do not agree we simply think and say: "Thanks for your concern but I have another view - and I think I am right." That's it. No childish drama, no revenge - and we are still good friends. For a Muslim, being criticised is very serious and is most often not experienced as help - not even criticism. It is experienced as a straight out insult. Following the cultural pattern concerning anger, the most likely response will be aggression in order to protect one's honour. This is simply what is expected among Muslims. If a person is not ready to show aggression towards a critic, it is dishonourable among Muslims. Seen from the perspective of Western psychology this is not honourable, but a sign of bad self confidence. People who cannot handle being criticised and become angry when people are questioning their values and behaviour, are not honourable. They are insecure. And even more: We Westerners think that if people get angry when criticised - it is probably because there is some truth in the criticism. One of the reasons that 7 out of 10 prisoners in the youth prison I worked in have a Muslim background, is that they had used violence to protect themselves against some kind of criticism. Not very constructive. A third difference concerns whether people feel that their lives are controlled mainly by themselves or by outer factors. In psychology it is called inner and outer locus of control. The West is very much dominated by an experience of inner locus of control. We know that our view on things, our choices, our way of handling our feelings, the way we choose to respond to others etc. is the main factor giving our lives direction. We have a whole industry built up around this cultural trait - I am part of this industry myself. Millions of psychologists, coaches, therapists, social workers, etc are all trained in helping people to reflect and to find better ways in leading their lives. If we visit the local library or a kiosk we will meet meters of self help books and magazines that tells us how we can change ourselves and become happier, richer, more efficient or popular, better lovers etc. Some say that all this self-reflection is too much, but this is how our culture simply is. Having an inner locus of control is definitely much more constructive because it involves a high degree of self responsibility. The back side of the medal can be - if we go to the extreme - that we take responsibility for mistakes that others do. In this way the more extreme Christians have something in common with many leftists: They blame themselves for things they have not done because they have too much pity with the ones who are actually creating the trouble. And this is not good. None of all this exists in the Muslim world. And the little psychiatry etc. that exists there is not based on their own culture but on Western science and view on the human psyche. In the Muslim culture it is outer rules, tradition and authorities that are deciding people's lives, and the space for inner reflection, or questioning the outer factors controlling one's life --is VERY small. Having an outer locus of control makes people feel irresponsible for their own actions, less prone to self reflection and a strong victim mentality and a demanding attitude is too often the result. Victim mentality most often includes the view that victims have the right to defend themselves with whatever means. Combining a high acceptance of aggression with a strong feeling of outer locus of control is an explosive cocktail. The ‘Angry victim’ does not show regret when using violence to ‘defend themselves.’ This lack of empathy and regret has sparked a discussion among experts on whether Muslim culture produces psychopathic traits or if it is just a "cultural thing". Finally a fourth difference concerns tolerance and identity. While we in the West are taught to be open to other cultures, races and religions, Islam teaches an extreme version of Apartheid. Most of my criminal Muslim clients found it unthinkable to commit crimes against other Muslims - unless it related to rival gangs or honour. Being Muslim means being member of a certain group that is not limited by country borders, skin colour or nationality. Muslims are first of all Muslims - even if one does not lead an Islamic life. Many of my Muslim clients smoked cigarettes and drank alcohol. They spent most of their drug money on prostitutes and had non-Muslim girlfriends. At the same time they burned cars and stoned the police and fire fighters rushing to stop the riots when the Danish newspapers re-printed the Muhammed cartoons as a sign of solidarity with Kurt Westergaard specifically and free speech in general. The identity as a Muslim simply goes very deep and this is the main reason why integration will never happen to the necessary extent. Conclusion: Thank you very much Nicolai Sennels for your time, and for sharing the insights and evidence gained in your work that shows that Muslims are psychologically unable to assimilate in the sense of sharing the same values and vision of a free society that we have. The inability to assimilate is traced back to Muslim ‘culture’ (ie Islam) yet we allow Muslim children here to be trained in this alternate, apartheid society by allowing them to attend Muslim schools. Your work shows stark differences between ‘westerners’ and Muslims with regard to anger and rage (Muslim rage is displayed daily..), personal responsibility, self-reflection and self control, honour, locus of control, empathy and remorse, tolerance and identity and a ‘victim mentality.’ Muslims also display a sense of supremacy over infidels (and racial supremacy as a white Arab society and history is forced onto all Muslims and black people are regarded as inferior and going to hell). Also clearly displayed is an intolerance of criticism, an inability to view and treat women and non-Muslims as equals, and a desire to be segregated from the host society whose laws don’t apply to them (ie religious, racial and gender apartheid). They identify strongly with the ‘Muslim culture’ even though second or third generation or not eligiously observant. The small pieces of information we get is that ‘sharia’ – Islamic ‘culture’ operates within Muslim communities in Australia which are in fact alternate parallel societies living parasitically on the host. Hence we see a failure to assimilate and greater criminality amongst Muslims compared with other groups. Both result in western governments throwing enormous resources into programs for people who have no intention of changing. “How many psychologists, social workers and cash does it take to change a Muslim? FIRST the Muslim has to want to change --- and they DON’T!” Interview with Nicolai Sennels part 2 looks at females, disturbed sexuality and some consequences for our society. Interview with Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels –Muslim females, disturbed sexuality, social consequences As noted in part 1, Nicolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who worked for some years with Muslim and non-Muslim criminals in Copenhagen. He noted significant differences in the ‘mindset’ between the two groups. Significant differences were found in areas such as anger/aggression/rage, personal responsibility and self-control, locus of control, self-reflection, perceptions honour and responses to ‘offended’ honour, tolerance, identity, empathy and remorse and a ‘victim mentality’. Such differences were related to the cultural background of the person where Muslims, whether associated with the mosque or not, whether 1st, 2nd or 3 rd generation, identified as Muslims and adhered largely to Islamic attitudes towards women , non-Muslims and western society and this was related to their high level of criminality and the failure or inability of Muslims as a group to assimilate into western society. Part 2 examines Islam’s core value of the suppression of women, the disturbed sexuality of Muslims and the consequences for our society resulting from the Muslim inability to assimilate. In other articles Sennels notes that appeasement is deadly as it emboldens Muslims and enhances their victim mentality as they regard us as weak and fail to respond with any gratefulness or improvement on their side. He denounces claims that we ‘stigmatise’ Muslims (victim mentality) by daring to criticise their text and behaviour (Hommaforum 2009) and suggests that ordinary citizens stand against the immature and psychologically unhealthy culture of Islam (Dymphna 2010). He notes the massive hidden costs of Islamic immigration where Muslims make little effort to assimilate despite costly efforts in every area to help eg special language classes. And he notes the high costs of Islamic inbreeding which continues into the west (Sennels c, 25 November 2010 www.australianislamistmonitor.org) Sennels suggests all Islamic immigration be stopped and instead, rather than pay the massive cost involved in coping with Muslims in our society, we pay Muslims to exit to the Muslim country of their choice. Muslim refugees should not be given citizenship and other Muslims should be required to fulfil a long list of criteria concerning integration or leave (Please read articles Sennels 2010 b, Hommaforum 2009, Glasov 2010a) Interview with Nicolai Sennels: Circe: Have you dealt with criminal Muslim females -- both converts and those born Muslim? Q: If you have, could you describe their psychological profile. Is there a difference between converts and those born Muslim? Sennels: Very few. Not so much that I was able to identify specific female psychological traits beyond the above mentioned. Q: Islam devalues females so must Muslim females gain status by ‘selling’ Islam and enforcing adherence to its dictates – i.e. women often participate in honour killing or killing sons accused of working with Israel. The abused become the abusers. Sennels: Most Muslim women are without a long list of human rights, including the right to pursue a professional career. Those who earn money are often forced to share it with their extended family. Their social life is also mostly limited to close family members. Building up social status is thus very limited. If a Muslim woman wants status it has to be within the religion. The more strictly they follow the Islamic code the more honourable. This surely is a significant source of fanaticism among Muslim women - which again influences the way they bring up their children. Circe: I cannot imagine anything worse for a female than Islam: paedophilia, clitoridectomy, beating, ploughing, cover her offensive body, restricted, described in the most derogatory terms e.g. devils, polluting, crooked, inferior in intelligence and religion and populating hell... yet western females ‘convert.’ Q: Are you aware of any personality characteristics or life experiences that pre-dispose a person/female to convert to a repressive, misogynist, violent religion like Islam. Sennels: I have had non-Muslim girls who preferred Muslim boyfriends and most of these girls had a history of being mistreated by their parents. The general reason for having a Muslim boyfriend was that they were looking for a strong man that could protect them. They also felt attracted by the aggressive attitude. Many young Muslim men can seem very charming - they wear expensive clothes and jewelery, they have a fancy car and they train their muscles. Insecure young girls who are mostly looking for a feeling of protection and a risky short cut to a higher social status can feel very attracted to this. Q: Does the totalitarian nature of Islam appeal to some as they are told what to do and who to hate, while those who deviate receive swift punishment and those who die for allah are excessively praised. Is Islam the simple choice for those who are uncertain or easily lead? Sennels: The few converts-wanna-bes that I met fits very well with your description. They were looking for a black and white picture of the World that fitted with their fascist-like sense of justice. Also they were longing to belong to a group that could give them the sense of security that they have been looking for. Circe: Lauren booth stated ‘I always felt the Ummah was a very loving, peaceful place.’ Even a vague look around the world reveals Islam’s violence and repression to females and non-Muslims and constant violence between Muslims showing the insanity of Ms Booth’s self-delusion. Q: Is there a psychological condition where people create this delusional world? Sennels: Well. I guess that if a woman is more looking for safety and structure than freedom, the Umma can seem attractive. I am sure that if Lauren Booth suddenly would like to wear sexy clothes, change her religion and have a new boyfriend she would not experience the Umma as loving and peaceful. Most people are willing to go very far to avoid seeing the truth if the truth contradicts their habitual way of living and perceiving things. Looking at the consequences that Muslims and especially Muslim women face if they refuse to follow Muslim traditions it is not hard for me as a psychologist to understand that many Muslims prefer to tell themselves that what they have is great. As we say in cold, rainy and windy Denmark: "You have to like the weather, because you cannot change it." b) How do you shatter the delusion when they ignore the evidence in front of them? Sennels: First you have to be able to offer them a safe alternative. If they see that you are right but risk their lives by breaking free, your effort is of no use. The first step is to build more shelters for women. Second we need to have social workers visit Muslim women in their homes to check if they are safe and free. This includes informing them about their rights and freedoms - and showing that we are able to protect them and their children with new identities etc. - if necessary in a new country - should they chose to defect. Circe: Islam segregates the sexes and turns females into the sexual slaves of men as ‘wives’ must be constantly ready to service the male. Islam fully endorses paedophilia – a sexual perversion. Paradise is an enormous brothel for men with young female ‘companions’ and young male ‘servants’. The female is loathed, shunned and devalued so Islamic sexuality is very ‘disturbed.’ Such disturbed sexuality is shown in the Google trends results showing that Pakistan (land of the pure) rates the highest in porn hits on the internet including varieties of animal porn, child porn and rape sex.(Morgan 2010).. Homosexual paedophilia ( pederasty) is rife in the Islamic world. 95% of Pakistani truck drivers consider indulging in sex during their ‘rest time’ and most prefer young boys who are readily available and cheap. (IndiaVision 2010) An American military study revealed the propensity of Afghani men to have sex with other men or boys and shun women yet they denied any ‘homosexuality’ (punishable by death under Islam). The men claimed they couldn’t ‘love’ another man but there was no problem with using them sexually! When a medic explained to an Afghan man what he needed to do to make his wife pregnant, his response was – How could one feel desire to be with a woman, who God has made unclean, when one could be with a man, who is clean? Surely this must be wrong.'" ‘Older "men of status" keep young boys on hand for sexual relationships. One of the country's favorite sayings, the report said, is "women are for children, boys are for pleasure." (Foxnews 2010) In 2004 the hidden sexual abuse of boys by clerics in madrasses was revealed. Though not uncommon, it was normally hushed up! (Ansari 2004). Theocracy/Islamic fundamentalism and child pornography are linked. Coded messages were added to hardcore child pornographic images (Kerbaj 2008) (And we continue to teach encryption to Muslims!!). Sexual abuse among Muslims is widespread including organised gang rapes of ‘girls from their own environment’ too scared to mention the rapes because the Muslim girl bares the shame. (Sennels 2010 a, Glasov 2010 b). 100% of assault rapes where the perpetrator was unknown to the victim, in Oslo in 2006, 2007, 2008 were committed by ‘non-western’ immigrants (Sennels 2010a). And the rapes of young boys in Islamic groups even in the west???? Q: Did you find a disturbed sexuality in the Muslim men you worked with? (Was the same found for the non-Muslims) Sennels: Their wide use of prostitutes was a clear sign of the lack of ability to create a meaningful sexual relationship with a girl. Many of them had Danish non-Muslim girlfriends but they often mistreated the girls, made them do sexual favours to their friends etc. We very seldom talked directly about sexuality but you could hear from the way they talked about sex and women this was influenced by a very sexist attitude. Q: Is their inability to relate to women as equal, free, individual human beings associated with their pathology? Sennels: Yes, but more than that -Putting women down also leads to pathology. Whatever we do in our outer lives ourselves influences our inner lives. If we treat women bad or do not like them, we will harm ourselves. I can understand that an aggressive and imperialistic culture needs to suppress the more empathic, sensitive and social qualities in society in order to produce merciless fighters and reach its goal. Q: Is controlling females and female sexuality a significant part of the core of Muslim culture? Sennels: Yes, it is. Muslim culture is centred around keeping women and the qualities that only women express fully down. No wonder that our more sensitive and female oriented cultures are looked down on by many Muslims. Circe: (Note: Neither I nor Nicolai Sennels regard homosexuality between consenting adults in an open society where males and females can mix freely, as a ‘pathology’ but child sexual abuse is a pathology as is ‘sex’ between men when it results from a society where women are loathed, unclean and locked away from males so sexuality is ‘deviated’ to relationships between males while females are shunned) Q: What psychological weaknesses does the rage, intolerance and fear of free speech from Muslims hide? Sennels: Emotional immaturity, bad self confidence and the inability to produce valid arguments. Also we have to know that the more illogical or inhuman a religion or thought system is, the more its adherents will fight to convince others to convert. Religious people through all of history have compensated for their inner doubts and lack of conviction by trying to convince and force other to follow the same faulty beliefs. Q: How should we respond to Muslim rage and threats – by humor, jokes, logic? Sennels: Surely humor is good for all parts in this conflict. Most Muslims clearly lack self irony and too many non-Muslims are too scared to speak their mind. A good laugh is the best cure for both of these "diseases". Most of all we have to keep saying the truth about Islam and Muslim culture and immigration - and we must never tire in the fight against UN's, EU's and the leftists attempts on suppressing free speech. Q: You described political correctness as a kind of collective cowardice. ‘The feeling of safety and social coherence is already long gone in many parts in hundreds of European cities as a result of Muslims’ anti-social behaviour and enmity towards non-Muslims” (Sennels in Glasov 2010 a) What do you see as the result if our cowardice continues? Sennels: The Islamists will get their way. Then we will have an enormous Universe where the only planet with intelligent life will be a full scale caliphate. Imagine that... It is the most embarrassing thing I can imagine. Q: Your work suggests that Muslims absorb Islam’s cultural/religious values and there is no hope of changing them. They accept paedophilia, misogyny, racism, violence and hatred towards others because their morality is not based on reason and empathy but is based on the view that everything Mohammad did, said or allowed or didn’t ban is morally OK –no matter how immoral we would find it! Indeed Muslims don’t want to change yet their ‘values’ are incompatible with ours. Is the solution don’t bring in Muslims if you wish to avoid a civil war? Sennels: History's answer is a clear Yes. And since they are already here we have to make the lack of ability or will to integrate so unpractical and economically unbeneficial that state sponsored emigration - repatriation - is the only attractive choice. We also have to limit the state’s Child Support so we only pay people for having the national average of children. This is now law in Denmark. Too many Muslim immigrants manage to have a lot of children and live from the Child Support. The demographic factor must not be underestimated. Q: For our own safety, should we prevent Muslims from joining our police and military and stop arming and training Muslims overseas? Are we training our enemy both within and without? (Note the Fort Hood massacre). Sennels: I can easily imagine situations where nepotism and misguided loyalty can cause Muslim policemen and soldiers to make mistakes. But I cannot imagine that this will create problems on a large scale. Besides, weapons are already easy to get on the black market for those who want them. If a real violent clash will come - and based on my psychological observations I think it will - the main battle field will be our big cities. Our enormous Muslim ghettoes will develop into copies of the Gaza-strip, which is characterized by extreme overpopulation, widespread poverty, lack of education and productivity, high crime rates, religious fanaticism and a violent hate against the non-Muslim surroundings. Just like the Gaza-strip the economy is mainly built on crime and support from the outside. The Muslim tradition only to shop in Muslim owned shops helps keep the money inside their own circles. In one country after the other the police force will be worn down by overtime work and stress, and the need for military help will appear. The real thing will start when the first Muslim ghetto will claim autonomy. Muslims' wish for secession is becoming visible in many places and the political infra-structure - including Islamic leadership, sharia legal system and home- made police - is already functioning to a high degree. If this happens - just as it has happened all the way through Islam's history and happens in many places today in places like China, Russia, Thailand, the Philippines, former Yugoslavia, Africa, Balkans etc. - it is a direct attack on the sovereignty of the state and we will be forced to react. And I am sure that the many Muslim fanatics and criminals will not hand themselves or their weapons over voluntarily. Other Muslim areas will start riots and attack authorities in solidarity with their ‘oppressed’ Muslim brothers and sisters. The usual revenge in the form of terror attacks, kidnappings and completely unreasonable political demands will appear and our world will not look like the one we have today for 2-3 decades. Circe: The Gallup Coexist Index 2009 A global Study of Interfaith Relations showed that 90% of the population of 12 different Muslim countries answered that religion was an important part of their life and a German study showed that the vast majority of German Muslims believe that the Quran is allah’s true words and describe themselves as religious to very religious (Glasov 2010b) ---ie their obsession with their religion continues into the west yet Islam is intensely hostile and endorses violence towards others. Q: Should Muslims be regarded as a category of people hostile to others and to western culture and hence unsuitable as immigrants? Sennels: Yes, I think that is a very correct observation for most Muslims. Q: a) Are people, particularly political leaders, becoming aware of your work and beginning to realise the truth it contains. Sennels: My book and my name is quite known in Denmark. I got a phone call from a psychiatrist from Guantanamo back in October who wanted some advise and my name is appearing in many articles on the internet. I know that my work has been discussed in the Danish and the Dutch parliament - possibly also other places. My feeling is that my work is pretty acknowledged and that people appreciate it. Q: Are you able to continue research into the impact of Islam on Muslims and on the societies Muslims enter? Sennels: No. My days as a psychologist for Muslims are probably over. I have to base my future work on other people’s experiences - and build on my professional education and experience. Q: What are your plans and hopes for the future? Sennels: To continue to do what I can to secure our well earned but fragile freedom against Islam and its enablers. And to inspire others to do the same. Conclusion: Again thanks to Nicolai Sennels whose honest reporting of his own work caused him to lose his job, though he has found other employment. Tragically our institutions are still involved in promoting the myth that Muslim violence and inability to assimilate is our fault when the ‘fault’ lies clearly with Muslims and their Muslim religion/culture. Isn’t it time we explained why members of widely varying ‘cultures’ have all been able to enter our countries and adopt our values and live under our laws while Muslims have NOT. Isn’t it time people who set up their apartheid enclaves, their parallel societies, who demand their own laws and demand that we adhere to them as well, were sent packing! No sharia here. Stop Islamic immigration to preserve our safety, freedom and equality and to preserve a tolerant society under one set of laws where sharia which allows many acts of perversion, sadism, intolerance and abuse can NEVER operate. The Muslim refusal to assimilate and the continued daydream of others that they will, costs us a fortune! Add to this the fact that European studies reveal that inbreeding in Muslim populations produces children with a lower IQ and a higher rate of birth defects and possible mental disorders which adds a further huge burden to the taxpayer. Remember, Muslims, ¼ of the world’s population (1.6 billion) have won only 9 Noble Prizes –5 for ‘peace’ (Ha, Ha) and only 2 for science –both working in the WEST (Sennels 2010a, Sennels 2010c-must read). Jews, much abused, have won about 170 Nobel Prizes from a tiny population of about 16 million! Multiple wives claiming welfare also adds to the tax burden due to Muslims. Muslims make the least desirable immigrants yet our lefty Labor government continues to allow them in and fails to halt the thousands, mostly Muslims who arrived illegally by boat this year, making a mockery of our laws and of those in refugee camps who apply to come here legally. Muslims are members of the Umma and have asylum in any Muslim country eg Indonesia, Malaysia – and the other countries they pass through, they CANNOT claim asylum here! It is time our immigration policy included as a major point THE ABILITY TO ASSIMILATE into AUSTRALIA’s CULTURE and ADHERE to OUR LAWS Muslims lack this ability and should not be acceptable as immigrants. For those who say, oh not all Muslims are criminal ....I remind them that the characteristics Sennels reports were found for Muslims and came from their Muslim ‘culture’ whether they were directly associated with a mosque or not. These characteristics reveal stark differences between the Muslim mindset and the western one and this spells trouble for our society whether displayed in overt criminality now or not. Remember, Muslims revere a prophet who was a practising paedophile who told followers to marry young virgins and handed girls out to friends; who endorsed clitoridectomy; who hit Aisha hard in the chest and told men they could beat and plough women and have concubines and multiple wives they could divorce with a few words; who used a wide array of derogatory terms for women and said they were inferior in their intelligence and religion and populated hell; who slaughtered, enslaved, raped and stole the women, children and property of others; who displayed extreme hatred of black people and Jews (RACISM); who stoned, amputated, beheaded, put hot irons into the eyes and had people flogged; who gave others the choice of death or conversion or slavery or for a certain few the chance to live as subjugated dhimmis paying the jizya tax and living in constant fear of death as non-Muslims in the Islamic world do TODAY. The mere presence of non-Muslims is considered ‘persecution’ for Muslims. Muslims rage at any criticism of Islam and are completely incapable of a rational look at their own ‘religion.’ The white Arab supremacist Mohammad and his god demanded that others be destroyed until ‘all the religion was allah’s.’ Islam is absolute totalitarianism –the religion, government and law. This is a brief list of the joy of Mohammad and his god allah, but I defy anyone to claim this fits Australia’s values and vision for society! Why then do we continue to bring in Muslims? As Sennels suggests, every citizen should write letters to newspapers, politicians etc and speak to others about the dangers of Islam and concerns over Islamic immigration as educating others is a first step in preserving our freedoms, values and society for our children. And we should save money by not bringing Muslims in in the first place and sending those that are here back to the Islamic world where they can follow their depraved laws and culture. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 22 2010, 10:37 AM Post #2 |
|
Deleted User
|
An Australian cleric calls for the beheading of Geert Wilders. Across the Islamic world the followers of other religions have their people killed, their daughters raped, their homes and businesses torched, their religious sites attacked, their texts destroyed and are relegated to the lowest jobs and the lowest social position while we say nothing. A pastor says he will burn a Koran and we become hysterical condemning his actions, his insensitivity and provocation etc. Can you provide some insights into OUR ‘mindset’ that allows us to ignore Islamic atrocities everywhere, while we deny free speech and even condemn those who dare to speak against or challenge Islam? -------- Exactly! |
|
|
| L4E | Dec 22 2010, 11:29 AM Post #3 |
|
Kafir
|
What a gem of an article. I am officially a fan of Sennels, I have an interest in psychology, so to see findings in relation to islam, just confirms all our suspicions. It is a real shame that through his incidental findings and the publishing of such, he lost his job, well, it doesn't support the liberals agenda now does it? Yet another victim of political correctness. His work would be so valuable to so many public bodies including promoting strategies for community cohesion, the liberalists supposed utopia. It is as if they don't actually want the community to be cohesed . Worse still, everyone official will write him off as a quack. What a shame. |
![]() |
|
| Aeneas Lavinium | Dec 23 2010, 09:09 PM Post #4 |
|
www.libertiesalliance.org
|
More by Nicolai Sennels that was in a report that was highlighted on the main EDL site entitled ‘A Consideration of Muslim Crime in the UK and the Response of the British Authorities’ (Part V, p20) can be viewed at: http://www.domainnamesanity.com/webumake/wwwsites/www.edlmedia.com/pdf/Dossier_fourth_hopefully.pdf http://www.libertiesalliance.org/2010/10/28/a-consideration-of-muslim-crime-in-the-uk-and-the-response-of-the-british-authorities/ |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · EDL Chat · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
1:05 AM Jul 11
|
Feliz Navidad (Gold) created by Sarah & Delirium of the ZNR





. Worse still, everyone official will write him off as a quack. What a shame.

1:05 AM Jul 11