| Welcome to Edl The Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Muslims trying to shut down criticism of Islam on Internet; Stealth Jihad by the OIC | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 21 2010, 02:32 AM (193 Views) | |
| Deleted User | Dec 21 2010, 02:32 AM Post #1 |
|
Deleted User
|
Excerpt from The Arab play for the Internet 15) On October 28, 2010, at OIC-CERT’s Second Annual General Meeting, OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu noted the following as a core mission of OIC-CERT: “In view of the phenomena of discrimination, stereotyping and defamation targeting Muslims and their religion known as ‘Islamophobia,’ we invite the OIC-CERT to use its available professional and technical resources (in line with its objectives stated in terms of reference) in order to cooperate with the ‘OIC Islamophobia Observatory‘ to identify the best ways and means including technical, administrative and legal tools to combat anti-Islamic contents on the internet.”[9] This issue bears more directly on the ongoing debate regarding ‘public morality’ objections and will be considered more fully in Point 2 below... http://www.israport.org/the-arab-play-for-the-internet |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 21 2010, 02:34 AM Post #2 |
|
Deleted User
|
They're worried about Islam being exposed on the internet. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 21 2010, 02:43 AM Post #3 |
|
Deleted User
|
It's a bit chuffin' late for that! |
|
|
| Lunar Monkey | Dec 21 2010, 02:48 AM Post #4 |
|
Patriot
|
Exposed? It's been photographed with it's pants around it's ankles with a confused looking donkey in front of it. Many times. |
![]() Support those who risk their lives to speak the truth! | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 21 2010, 02:50 AM Post #5 |
|
Deleted User
|
Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC), full of corrupt stealthers. Wtf we have anything to do with these arseholes g*d only knows. Should be disbanded. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 21 2010, 07:03 AM Post #6 |
|
Deleted User
|
And then some but they don't like the truth and they want to stop people from hearing it, reading it and watching it. We need to step it up a gear as well in that case. We will never be silenced by these islamist scum! |
|
|
| dozyuk | Dec 21 2010, 07:16 AM Post #7 |
|
Kafir
|
It's still a major worry, they close the net and use a bit of taquyya, and the establishment falls over itself to help them achieve their objective. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Kaizer | Dec 21 2010, 10:12 AM Post #8 |
|
Member
|
I think there is a public duty to "expose", rather, provide honest and accurate accounts of any form of human control systems, such as religions. One fundamental premise upon which they operate is, they are "perfect" and eveyone else who is NOT a follower is in someway abnormal. Any control system needs the test of scrutiny, it must be investigated and any unusualy practice addressed by the respective leaders. I have heard some of the allegations of odd behavious brushed aside by adept orators, as any group would. But provided any unusual behaviour is accurate and can be substantiated, it must be put into the public doman so we can decide for ourselves. |
|
My cows are a reminder of the destruction by the UK Govt/DEFRA of our long standing dairy farming industry. So please all members, think before you reply, if you only have silly schoolboy answers, leave it to the others who can answer in a civil way. (copied from Admin Ali) - let's try and put brains back into Britain. | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 21 2010, 10:35 AM Post #9 |
|
Deleted User
|
The thing that they cannot stand above all others is any criticism of, and especially ridicule of Mohammed. Mohammed is Islam's one and only foundation, because the cult is massively in contradiction with its two predecesors, Judaism and Christianity. Mohammed is the Achilles heel. Once you have destroyed Mohammed's credibility you have destroyed Islam. We therefore need to present the OIC with a fait accompli, by having so much anti-Mohammedan stuff on the net that they'll never be able to control it. Rational and ethical criticism of Mohammed may be effective with kuffars, but because Muslims are irrational and have an 'ethical' system that admires Mohammed's predatory behaviour, ridicule of Mohammed and exposing him as a conman will be more psychologically effective against Mohamedans. Ridicule: http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/ridicule-mockey-and-satire-best-weapons.html Conman: http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/exorcising-mohammed-conman-from-minds.html |
|
|
| tobias malachi | Dec 21 2010, 10:48 AM Post #10 |
Infidel
|
If we lose the internet then we take to the streets and maybe form some tempory alliances with more extreem groups. By the time that they could get this through our membership forum/facebook should be over the 100,000 then add on the membership of other groups and we could be talking of 250,000 quite a large number to try and surpress within a democracy. We the EDL believe in the rite of peaceful protest but that does not mean that we will stand by and not defend our rights.
Edited by tobias malachi, Dec 21 2010, 10:52 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| penningtonuk | Dec 21 2010, 11:01 AM Post #11 |
![]()
Kafir
|
read is sorry Internet porn block 'not possible' say ISPs Metal sieve, Eyewire A nationwide system to block pornography "at source" is unlikely to prove effective, say experts. Continue reading the main story Related stories * Government tackles data disputes * MP calls for pornography 'opt-in' * Minister supports 'two-speed' net Government plans to block pornography "at source" are unlikely to prove effective, say ISPs. The proposal to cut off access to pornographic material was floated by Culture Minister Ed Vaizey in an interview with the Sunday Times. The government is talking to ISPs to set up a meeting at which the proposal will be discussed. But, say experts, technical challenges mean any large scale filtering system is doomed to failure. Legal issues A spokesman for the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, confirmed Mr Vaizey's plan to talk to ISPs about setting up an age verification scheme to govern access to pornographic sites. "This is a very serious matter," said Mr Vaizey. "I think it's very important that it's the ISPs that come up with solutions to protect children." "I'm hoping they will get their acts together so we don't have to legislate, but we are keeping an eye on the situation and we will have a new communications bill in the next couple of years." In response to the government proposal, Nicholas Lansman, secretary general of the Ispa industry body, said: "Ispa firmly believes that controls on children's access to the internet should be managed by parents and carers with the tools ISPs provide, rather than being imposed top-down." Mr Lansman said its members provided parents with many different means of controlling what is accessible via the computers in their homes. "Online safety is a priority issue for the internet industry and ISPA will be discussing the options available to protect children with Government," he said. "ISPs currently block child abuse content which is illegal and widely regarded as abhorrent," said Mr Lansman. "Blocking lawful pornography content is less clear cut, will lead to the blocking of access to legitimate content and is only effective in preventing inadvertent access." BT, the UK's largest ISP, said it would be "happy" to take part in any discussion of the issues, but added: "There are many legal, consumer rights and technical issues that would need to be considered before any new web blocking policy was developed." Filter failure "Unfortunately, It's technically not possible to completely block this stuff," said Trefor Davies, chief technology officer at ISP Timico. Continue reading the main story “Start Quote If we take this step it will not take very long to end up with an internet that's a walled garden of sites the governments is happy for you to see” End Quote Trefor Davies Timico He said the sheer volume of pornographic material online and the number of ways that people access it, via the web, file-sharing networks, news groups, discussion boards and the like, made the job impossible. While some proponents of a national pornographic filtering scheme cite the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) as an example of how such a scheme might work, Mr Davies said it was not a good guide. The IWF circulates a list to ISPs of sites found to be hosting illegal images of child sexual abuse. However, said Mr Davies, the IWF draws up its list largely using information passed to it by the public. In addition it only tackles illegal content found on websites. Such a system would not work if it was used to deal with millions of porn sites, chat rooms and bulletin boards, he said. Experience with filtering systems, he said, shows that they are a very blunt tool that often blocks access to sites that could be useful. "You end up with a system that's either hugely expensive and a losing battle because there are millions of these sites or it's just not effective," he said. "The cost of putting these systems in place outweigh the benefits, to my mind," he said. Continue reading the main story “Start Quote What we are talking about is censorship to protect our children” End Quote Miranda Suit Safer Media Mr Davies also feared that any wide-scale attempt to police pornographic content would soon be expanded to include pirated pop songs, films and TV shows. "If we take this step it will not take very long to end up with an internet that's a walled garden of sites the governments is happy for you to see," he said. 'Child protection' His comment was echoed by Jim Killock, chair of the Open Rights Group which campaigns on digital liberties issues. "This is not about pornography, it is about generalised censorship through the back door," said Mr Killock. "This is the wrong way to go," he said. "If the government controlled a web blacklist, you can bet that Wikileaks would be on it." Miranda Suit, co-chair of Safer Media, which campaigns to make media safe for children, told the BBC that the pornography available on the internet was "qualitatively and quantitatively" different from any that has gone before. Ms Suit cited a report compiled by the US conservative think tank The Witherspoon Institute which suggested that easy access to pornography was damaging some young people. "Children are becoming addicted in their teens to internet pornography," she said. "They are being mentally damaged so they cannot engage in intimate relationships." Safer Media backed the government call to block pornography "at source", said Ms Suit. "What we are talking about is censorship to protect our children," she said. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 21 2010, 11:01 AM Post #12 |
|
Deleted User
|
No wonder Islam has survived so long when it has disallowed any form of criticism in all that time. Same with its expansion - which historically has been done by force and forced conversion. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Dec 21 2010, 11:33 AM Post #13 |
|
Deleted User
|
Islam is an information control cult! "O ye who believe! Ask not questions about things which if made plain to you, may cause you trouble. Some people before you did ask such questions, and on that account lost their faith." (Surah 5:101-102). "The Holy Prophet himself forbade people to ask questions ...so do not try to probe into such things." (The Meaning of the Qur'an, Maududi, vol. III, pgs. 76-77) "The prophet was asked about things which he did not like, and when the questioner insisted, the Prophet got angry. (vol. 1, no. 92) The Prophet got angry and his cheeks or his face became red. (vol. 1, no. 91) "Allah has hated you...[for] asking too many questions." (vol. 2, no. 555; and vol. 3, no. 591, Bukhari's Hadith commenting on Muhammad’s reaction to hostile questioners.) Although in the Westerm world, Islam cannot enable their information control as they do in Muslim controlled countries, there is still significant misinformation that Muslims believe about the Bible and Christianity. As you can see from the three quotes above, Muslims are forbidden to question Islamic faith, and are expected to accept its truthfulness blindly without investigation. Muhammad understood that information was the main enemy of his newly invented religion. In many Muslim controlled nations, for example, young men are paid to learn NOTHING but the Koran to the exclusion of science and history and current world events. They are told this is all they need, but in reality they are brainwashed and basic world information is deliberately withheld from them. Although Muslims in the Western world will claim Islam is an open religion, the fact remains that they contradict the actions of their brethren in Muslim controlled nations. In other words, actions speak louder than words! Remember, if Islam is such an open religion, why are Christians harassed and murdered in all countries where Muslims are in control of the civil governments. http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-questions.htm
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · EDL Chat · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
1:13 AM Jul 11
|
Feliz Navidad (Gold) created by Sarah & Delirium of the ZNR










1:13 AM Jul 11