| Welcome to Edl The Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Why Islam must be EXPELLED from the West; ...hard-hitting essay by Fjordman | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 20 2010, 09:04 AM (211 Views) | |
| Deleted User | Dec 20 2010, 09:04 AM Post #1 |
|
Deleted User
|
From http://www.rightsidenews.com/2010121912385/editorial/rsn-pick-of-the-day/fjordman-why-islam-must-be-expelled-from-the-west.html "...We’ve been told for years that suicide bombers who blow themselves up in civilian areas in Israel are “freedom fighters struggling against Israeli occupation.” Does that mean that this Muslim blew himself up to protest against the Swedish occupation of Stockholm? Sweden has no colonial history, at least not outside of northern Europe. It is a self-appointed champion of Third World countries and has virtually surrendered its third-largest city to immigrant mobs and substantial chunks of other cities, too. Swedish authorities are using the most extreme methods imaginable to suppress any dissent among the native people, who are being ethnically cleansed from their own land. The authorities always side with immigrants against the natives in the case of conflict. Muslims in Sweden can harass the natives as much as they want to and have access to all kinds of welfare goodies and a much higher standard of living than they would have in their own countries. In short, they have no imaginable, rational reason to complain, yet they still blow themselves up. In Sweden, all the traditional excuses employed by Multiculturalists and Leftists throughout the Western world, fail. This leaves just one possible explanation, the only one never mentioned in Western mainstream media: That Muslims and their culture are fundamentally incompatible with our values and societies. Prohibiting all forms of criticism or mockery of Islam and its Prophet is an essential part of sharia, Islamic religious law. According to Islamic historical sources, individuals such as the poetess Asma bint Marwan were killed by the followers of Muhammad for having done nothing other than mocking Islam. This then became a part of the Sunna, the personal example of Muhammad and his companions, which is the most authoritative source of Islamic law next to the Koran itself. It was for the same reason that Theo van Gogh was murdered in Amsterdam in 2004. Yes, mainstream, traditional Islam today stipulates that those who mock Islam deserve to be murdered. No other major religion on this planet dictates anything similar. It sounds nearly unbelievable to the average person that one of the largest religions on Earth, which is “respected” by the United Nations and political leaders worldwide, can be that bad, but this is unfortunately true. Not only is this the case, but the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), the largest voting bloc at the UN, is teaming up with other dictatorships and African nations as we speak to ban “Islamophobia” across the world, also in the West. Islam is more totalitarian than the most totalitarian ideologies that have ever existed in the Western world. Even Der Führer or Comrade Stalin never expected or demanded that every single man should copy all of their personal habits and their silly little mustaches, for which we should be eternally grateful. Islam, on the other hand, stipulates that all men everywhere and for all times should copy Muhammad’s personal habits and example in minute detail. Islam is a creed which says that men should urinate like Muhammad and that Muslims should wage a war against all other men on the planet until they, too, urinate like their Prophet. This is a provocative way of putting things, yes, but theologically speaking it is not incorrect. While Muhammad was not divine he was, as some Muslims say, the “living Koran.” John L. Esposito in Islam: The Straight Path, one of the most pro-Islamic books in existence, states: “Muslims look to Muhammad’s example for guidance in all aspects of life: how to treat friends as well as enemies, what to eat and drink, how to make love and war. Nowhere is this seen more clearly than in the growth of Prophetic traditions….His impact on Muslim life cannot be overestimated, since he served as both religious and political head of Medina: prophet of God, ruler, military commander, chief judge, lawgiver. As a result, the practice of the Prophet, his Sunna or example, became the norm for community life. Muslims observed and remembered stories about what the Prophet said and did. These reports or traditions (hadith) were preserved and passed on in oral and written form. The corpus of hadith literature reveals the comprehensive scope of Muhammad’s example; he is the ideal religiopolitical leader as well as the exemplary husband and father. Thus when many Muslims pray five times each day or make the pilgrimage to Mecca, they seek to pray as the Prophet prayed, without adding or subtracting from the way Muhammad is reported to have worshipped. Traditions of the Prophet provide guidance for personal hygiene, dress, eating, marriage, treatment of wives, diplomacy, and warfare.” According to sharia, non-Muslim dhimmis can on certain conditions be allowed to retain their lives under Islamic rule, provided that they remain totally submissive to Muslims at all times. Any perceived “insult,” however slight, could immediately trigger violent reactions. In practice, a mere rumor that anybody has done something which displeases Muslims can cause retaliations and murders. This is how Christians in Pakistan or elsewhere live on a daily basis, constantly fearful of Jihadist attacks, and this is how many Muslims want us to live as well. Meanwhile, our authorities, intellectuals and mass media continue to import people who are plotting to murder us while we have our genetalia screened and checked at our airports. If a single non-Muslim says anything critical about Islam, his entire community can in principle be punished for this. Basically, this means that if one cartoonist in Germany, the USA or Denmark makes a cartoon mocking Muhammad, this could potentially trigger Jihadist terrorist attacks against his entire country for “waging a war against Islam,” because his “tribe” is held collectively responsible for his actions. This was exactly the Islamic logic behind Taimour Abdulwahab’s terror attack in Stockholm. There is no such thing as an individual in this culture; the tribe is everything. Muslims, being good hypocrites, are always the first following an Islamic terrorist attack to state that all Muslims should not be punished for the actions of a few, yet this is precisely what their own laws prescribe for non-Muslims. Before the general elections in 2006 the Swedish Muslim League, the largest Islamic organization in the country, published a long list where they not merely requested, but essentially demanded, separate family laws for Muslims; that public schools should employ imams to teach homogeneous classes of Muslims children in the language of their original homeland. (The Swedish city of Malmö already has pre-school classes where all teaching is conducted in Arabic. This is “good for integration.”); a “mosque in every municipality,” built through interest-free loans made available by local municipalities to demonstrate “Islam’s right to exist in Sweden” and to “heighten the status of and respect for” Muslims; separation between boys and girls in gymnastics and swimming education; and laws instating Islamic holidays as public holidays for Muslims. Swedes should also ensure that all Muslims get two hours off from work during the congregational Friday prayer every week and an Islamic burial ground available in every municipality in which there are Muslims. Last, but not least, they demanded that the authorities and the already heavily censored, pro-Multicultural mass media should take even stronger steps to combat “Islamophobia” in the general public. These demands were rejected back then, but they will be repeated, not just in Sweden but throughout the Western world. As long as we have sizeable Muslim communities here this is inevitable. Muslims are not here to live in peace as equals; they are here to colonize, subjugate, harass and dominate us. Their holy book, the Koran, demands nothing less. But if all of this is true, how can we coexist peacefully with Muslims in our countries? The short answer is that we cannot. No matter how much you appease them, it will never be enough. As a matter of fact, since they come from a culture which respects only brute force they will despise you as weak and become more aggressive if you try to reason with them. Their religion also states that Muslims are the “best of peoples” – the true master race – and that they are destined by Allah to rule all mankind. They are filled with illusions of grandeur and superiority, yet the harsh reality is that their societies are lagging behind those of others. This constitutes an inversion of the natural order which can only have been caused by demonic actions and must be reversed at all costs. As long as they remain in our countries, they will work to subvert and destroy us. It is quite literally a religious duty for them to do so. So why don’t you hear this from most Western political leaders or mass media? Because they are lying to you, plain and simple. The truth is that there is no such thing as a moderate Islam; that nobody has yet managed to come up with a credible theoretical way to reform Islam; and that there are no practical indications of any softening or modernization of Islam actually taking place. Since the adherents of this creed in its present form are waging a war of annihilation against us and the civilization we have created, this leaves only one possible conclusion if we wish to retain our culture and freedom: Physical separation. Islam and those who practice it must be totally and permanently removed from all Western nations. Potential objections can be raised to this solution. One is that it might provoke Muslims and trigger a world war. To this I will say that our mere existence as free and self-ruled peoples constitutes a provocation to them. Besides, we are already in a world war. Technically speaking, it started 1400 years ago, the mother of all wars. Against European civilization it has witnessed two main phases, the first one with the Arabs in early medieval times, and the second one with the Turks in early modern times. This is the third Islamic Jihad, and it has penetrated deeper into Europe than ever before because we don’t fight back. If the other guy walks up to you and starts punching you in the face then you are already in a fight, whether you want this or not. If you do not defend yourself properly then you have already lost. Another objection is that expelling Muslims from the West would not end the war. They would merely continue from their original home countries, aided by missiles and modern technology. This could well be true. The separationist strategy does not imply that removing Islam from the West alone is all that will ever be required, only that this is the bare minimum that is acceptable. If Muslims remain aggressive, we retain the option of further actions, including directly targeting their holy cities of Mecca and Medina using conventional or non-conventional weapons. Having large numbers of Muslims in our societies is anyway very costly, and the aggressive fifth column in our midst will severely limit our freedom of action. Finally, one could claim that the overall problem with the modern West is the general mass immigration and Multiculturalism promoted by our treasonous elites and that Islam merely constitutes a secondary infection. This is also partly true. No, just because Muslim immigration is especially bad does not mean that all other forms of immigration are unproblematic. Nevertheless, Muslims top the list over hostile aliens who do not belong in European or European-derived nations. The Islamic threat is real and needs to be dealt with. The Serbian-American writer Serge Trifkovic, author of the book Defeating Jihad, has stated that the ongoing failure by their entrusted leaders to demographically protect European and European-derived nations constitutes the greatest betrayal in history. I am tempted to agree with him. In the end, the traitors and fifth columnists we have in our media and academia must be removed from power and replaced with people who are loyal to us and our nations. |
|
|
| infidel1000 | Dec 20 2010, 11:22 AM Post #2 |
Member
|
excellent post bamiyan and i couldn't agree with you or the article more,the politicians of the free world have betrayed us,appeasement never works ever,we need to remove these self serving pigs and replace them with people who will actually represent us. |
![]() |
|
| dozyuk | Dec 20 2010, 01:23 PM Post #3 |
|
Kafir
|
A really good article Bamiyan, and an interesting read, I agree with a lot of what you say. All people who care about the future of our country, will have tried to think of the ultimate solution, I think it would be difficult to expel Muslims from western countries, thus separating the planet into Islam and Non Islam areas, this is due to the failed global multi-cultural experiment, this method would persecute innocent people, best to accept that we cant turn the clock back. I believe the solution is easier than most people think, that is to ban Islam in this and other western countries - make it illegal on the grounds that it is a hate cult. this would give power of law to the police/establishment to act against: Illegal immigrants, terrorists and hate preachers (they could be either expelled or imprisoned) this way, the clocks really could be turned back. It would also empower 'trapped' Muslims to turn their backs on Islam, these people would be able to live here in peace. Now the hard bit, how do we get the law changed? |
| |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Dec 20 2010, 02:30 PM Post #4 |
|
Deleted User
|
It is not going to be banned as a "hate cult" whilst the muslim countries have the oil. Far better (and not reliant on government) is to get the shameful history of islamic slave-trading known by everyone in the west. Shame them out of islam, and if not, then at least turn everyone against islam. |
|
|
| Capt Haddock | Dec 20 2010, 02:55 PM Post #5 |
|
Infidel
|
There is no rationality in Islam, it is a backward repulsive doctrine designed purely to hate and oppress people whom are unfortunate to fall under its spell. Many people born into this world have no choice but to be indoctrinated by Islam from their very birth, the parents having suffered the same fate, and there is no escape. Death is the only alternative to those who wish to leave Islam, death is the only alternative to those whom refuse to submit. This alone should be enough to ban the Qur'an from the free west because it is calling for murder. It is not taken out of any context; it is what Islam is all about: submission and death. |
| Blistering Barnacles! | |
![]() |
|
| dozyuk | Dec 20 2010, 03:08 PM Post #6 |
|
Kafir
|
I agree that Islam is highly unlikely to be banned, not whilst we have the self serving, snout in the trough bunch of excuses that we call MPs, ruining our country. And I agree, we should put effort into educating the wider public about the shameful horrors of Islam. But that in itself would only postpone the inevitable, Islam will still be here, attempting to eradicate us and out way of life. We need a solution that will keep our heirs and descendants safe, which brings me back to a peaceful and legal dismantling of Mohammed's hateful movement. |
| |
![]() |
|
| williamdegriffin | Dec 20 2010, 03:26 PM Post #7 |
|
Patriot
|
you hit the nail right on the head , |
|
This land is mine and as such respect me and my ways for my tolerance only goes so far william de griffin REGAIN THE CHURCH REMOVE ISLAM FROM THE UK AND EUROPE. | |
![]() |
|
| dozyuk | Dec 20 2010, 03:49 PM Post #8 |
|
Kafir
|
No arguments from me, it's very frustrating that we seem to be powerless, and unable to do more. |
| |
![]() |
|
| lancastrian | Dec 20 2010, 04:07 PM Post #9 |
Member
|
Same here. First point of attack I think is on Sharia law, rolling back the courts already established. Coupled with that, getting the Saudi National Curriculum out of Islamic schools and ensuring any replacement fits our values not those of Sharia law. Let's face it, ther's plenty of ammo available and a lot of the stuff in that curriculum is already actually illegal so we need to concentrate on getting existing laws applied i.e. making sure they cut both ways! |
| Outlaw sharia law | |
![]() |
|
| ageofreason | Dec 20 2010, 06:45 PM Post #10 |
Member
|
Spot on, as usual Bamiyan. Concerning, the piece regards the UN. Can you imagine the the Wests reaction to the idea of a "Solution"?? |
![]() |
|
| Mahihkan | Dec 20 2010, 07:08 PM Post #11 |
![]()
Member
|
It is not going to be banned as a "hate cult" whilst the muslim countries have the oil. Here's the nail, or should I say thorn. It seems the left do everything they can to stop us becoming more self-reliant. They ban drilling and exploration where and whenever they can. They use the environment and the green movement to hide behind, and most of the population don't know and don't bother to educate themselves. I remember back to the late 60's when the price of oil was tied to immigration and a more openness to the west for the Saudi's and their investments. |
| AUT PAX AUT BELLUM | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · EDL Chat · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
1:14 AM Jul 11
|
Feliz Navidad (Gold) created by Sarah & Delirium of the ZNR







1:14 AM Jul 11