| Welcome to Edl The Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Ethnic Density Protects Mental Health; Recent scientific study finds more evidence | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 26 2010, 03:20 PM (60 Views) | |
| AQH | Oct 26 2010, 03:20 PM Post #1 |
Patriot
|
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/731023 From Medscape Medical News More Evidence Ethnic Density Protects Mental Health Megan Brooks Authors and Disclosures Print This Share October 22, 2010 — A new study from the United Kingdom confirms that living in areas where higher proportions of people of the same ethnic background live offers protection against common mental disorders, but it remains unclear why this is so. For some ethnic groups, living in areas surrounded by people of the same background was associated with better perceived social support and fewer reported experiences of discrimination, but these effects failed to explain the protective effect on mental health, the study team reports in the October 22 issue of the British Medical Journal. Jayati Das-Munshi, MBBS, MRCPsych, MSc, from the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, United Kingdom, and colleagues analyzed data on 4281 adults of Irish, black, Caribbean, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and white British ethnicity randomly sampled from 892 areas in England. They were between 16 and 74 years old and participated in the Ethnic Minorities Psychiatric Illness Rates in the Community Survey in England in 2000. The most ethnically dense areas were also the poorest, the researchers found. Despite this, they say for each 10–percentage point increase in own-group ethnic density, there was evidence of a decreased risk for anxiety and depression for all ethnic minority groups combined (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 - 0.99; P = .02). This was the case after they adjusted for a priori confounders. The mental health benefits of living among people of the same ethnic background were most evident for Bangladeshi people (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62 - 0.91; P = .005) and Irish people (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06 - 0.74; P = .01). For all other ethnic groups in the study, except the white British group, there seemed to be a protective effect of living in areas of higher own-group density, but the evidence was "very weak," the investigators report. Association Clear, But Not Mechanism "For some groups, living in areas of higher own-group density was associated with a reduction in the reporting of discrimination and with improved social support and improved social networks," Dr. Das-Munshi and colleagues found. However, none of these factors seem to mediate the protective effects of ethnic density on mental health. The notion of there being a protective effect of living in a high-own-ethnic-group-density area is not new, Helen Lester, MB, ChB, MD, FRCGP, from the National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, United Kingdom, notes in an accompanying editorial. "The association is clear but the underlying mechanisms are not." This study "leaves us more convinced of the effect, but further research is needed to clarify the scope and size of the effects, including the 'tipping point' or degree of density needed to exert a protective effect on health. Above all, it highlights the need for further hypotheses about underlying mechanisms," Dr. Lester writes. The fact that the study findings are based on data collected 10 years ago "reduces its relevance a little in that the ethnic profile of England has changed slightly," Dr. Lester points out in her commentary. Dr. Das-Munshi and colleagues agree. "The landscape of migration in England and the settlement of ethnic minority communities has changed over this time, and it is possible that the effects reported here may no longer be relevant to the groups included in this study, or to some of the more recent migrant groups to England." An advantage of the study, they say, is that mental health outcomes were systematically assessed using structured clinical assessments. Previous research examining ethnic density associations has tended to use service contract data to determine rates of mental disorders, which could introduce selection bias, they note. Still, although this analysis provides more evidence in support of a potential "psychic shelter" function of ethnically diverse neighborhoods, "there were no neat conclusions," the study team notes. "Despite attempting to examine the role of racism, social support, or social networks in mediating these effects, we were not able to definitively unpack the meaning of ethnic density," they point out. Dr. Das-Munshi and colleagues think future studies should look at other possible mediators, "such as interactional effects with poverty, social capital, cultural identify, and acculturation, and the role of social support not limited to immediate personal relationships." The authors and editorialist have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. BMJ. Published online October 21, 2010. SEE ALSO: http://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c5367.full I'm not surprised, as it aligns with other studies too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_D._Putnam#Diversity_and_trust_within_communities Edited by AQH, Oct 26 2010, 03:22 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Wigone | Oct 26 2010, 03:25 PM Post #2 |
Patriot
|
The mental health benefits of living among people of the same ethnic background were most evident for Bangladeshi people (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62 - 0.91; P = .005) and Irish people (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06 - 0.74; P = .01). For all other ethnic groups in the study, except the white British group, there seemed to be a protective effect of living in areas of higher own-group density, but the evidence was "very weak," the investigators report. No doubt they will be after another grant for further study. Oh just saw this at the end....yeah research scientist and dr's always need to do 'further study' Dr. Das-Munshi and colleagues think future studies should look at other possible mediators, "such as interactional effects with poverty, social capital, cultural identify, and acculturation, and the role of social support not limited to immediate personal relationships." Edited by Wigone, Oct 26 2010, 03:26 PM.
|
|
They don't like it up 'em. Don't tell them your name Pike. | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Oct 26 2010, 03:26 PM Post #3 |
|
Deleted User
|
It stands too reason; people go out of their way to form clubs to be with others who are like them, it's been known for donkeys years that people who have similar handicaps for instance gain confidence and enjoy being with others who are similarly handicapped. It goes against human nature to expect people to integrate when there are established ghettos where they will literally feel at home, that's how we human being operate, like it or not. |
|
|
| AQH | Oct 26 2010, 03:36 PM Post #4 |
Patriot
|
Putnams finds are revealing:
Edited by AQH, Oct 26 2010, 03:37 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · EDL Chat · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:11 PM Jul 11
|
Feliz Navidad (Gold) created by Sarah & Delirium of the ZNR






8:11 PM Jul 11