| Welcome to Edl The Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Guardian on the EDL; comment is free! | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 1 2010, 11:44 AM (209 Views) | |
| human target | Jun 1 2010, 11:44 AM Post #1 |
|
Member
|
with the guardians "expose" of the edl this weekend, i noticed that the comments section was omitted, denying the opportunity for a rebuttal. An editorial has now appeared, i suggest a rapid and concerted response by members of this forum take place to put them straight on a couple of facts. link here |
![]() "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." -Thomas Jefferson | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 12:07 PM Post #2 |
|
Deleted User
|
Well spotted, done my comment, already had my Guardian account for comments. I think I must have registered for just about every paper in the country. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 12:12 PM Post #3 |
|
Deleted User
|
One of the comments: mannin Most terrorists are Muslims aren't they ? Or are we forbidden to say that just like most paedophiles are white men, or are we forbidden to say thar? |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 12:15 PM Post #4 |
|
Deleted User
|
I hate all this "EDL and BNP" nonsence. I find it really offencive tbh. Were are the comments?? |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 12:17 PM Post #5 |
|
Deleted User
|
Me too. Click the link and scroll down. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 12:19 PM Post #6 |
|
Deleted User
|
I was about to post this up. My mate is over at the moment and we are debating it. There are some very negitive things going on and I suspect that they have been selected to put us in the worst possible light. |
|
|
| Capt Haddock | Jun 1 2010, 12:19 PM Post #7 |
|
Infidel
|
What link mate? Is there one? |
| Blistering Barnacles! | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 12:24 PM Post #8 |
|
Deleted User
|
It's on OP but here it is again. (heavy night?) ![]() http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/jun/01/english-defence-league-islamophobia |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 12:26 PM Post #9 |
|
Deleted User
|
Click the white text in the first post by 'human target'. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 12:28 PM Post #10 |
|
Deleted User
|
O.P. stands for Original Post for anyone who doesn't know.
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 12:30 PM Post #11 |
|
Deleted User
|
quite a few agreeing islamic nutters are the bigger problem |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 12:33 PM Post #12 |
|
Deleted User
|
Bloody hell, don't tell me I need a translator!
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 12:43 PM Post #13 |
|
Deleted User
|
Ok so my mate has now left the building. Was a very interesting chat with him. To sum things up he agrees that militant Islam and the way Islam is being taught and spread in the UK and other countries is a problem. What he did point out is that the EDL are going in to the most heavily Islamified places in the UK. This will cause confrontation’s and riots. This is the part he objected to and states it for why he does not support the EDL. I think he fails to relies that by going to a town centre that is hardly there home estate. What this article does show is that those who already dislike the EDL have more fuel for the fire. It does not really add anything new. Ok, there were some very obnoxious points of view. All we can do is to continue to protest peacefully and take the moral high ground. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 12:50 PM Post #14 |
|
Deleted User
|
this is the worst edl coverage i have seen, it is so biased it is beyond words, the daily mail did a bad one at the weelend aswell, the media seem to be increasing their hostility to the edl, i noticed there was talk of the edl committing acts of terror! what planet are these journalists on, the edl should challenge this stuff in court. slander i think they call it. the edl are a threat to public order! what about the uaf, and the gangs of violent muslims we have in places like oldham and bradford |
|
|
| bash_S | Jun 1 2010, 01:00 PM Post #15 |
|
Newbie
|
That would be Libel rather than slander as it is down in print. The difference between slander and libel, is that libel is the written or otherwise published, public defamation of a person or entity such as an organization or company, while slander is the spoken false defamation of a person or entity.
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 01:17 PM Post #16 |
|
Deleted User
|
'The Guardian's brave and insightful undercover investigation into the activities of the EDL' magic mushrooms must be out early this year due to global warming. remember this paper backs the self loathing hand wringers of the liberal democrats so whats the suprise. theyre TERRIFIED of patriotism. brave and insightful hahahahahaha brilliant. |
|
|
| human target | Jun 1 2010, 01:28 PM Post #17 |
|
Member
|
you know, i've looked at the comments and generally (IMHO) they seem to realise that there is a problem. they may not agree with how we do things, but most are aware, critically analysing the article put on the website. it's not the first time I've seen this either. They may wish to demonise us as it "fits" with the media rhetoric and labelling of the EDL as a far right organisation ( a label i personally disagree with) But the fact we have supporters of different ethnic backgrounds, gender and sexual preference means we cannot be easily be labelled. we are making a difference, more and more people are waking up and realising what is happening and what could happen. |
![]() "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." -Thomas Jefferson | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 01:30 PM Post #18 |
|
Deleted User
|
Have you read any of these comments? What a pile of s**t! Very few of these ignorant, arrogant twat's have done any research and very few of them validate what they are saying with any facts. Wound me right up reading them and I had to stop. Didn't we get any comments on there or are they being removed? |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 01:35 PM Post #19 |
|
Deleted User
|
its the guardian mate! what does everyone expect. just point and laugh. theyre terrified of the EDL. no guardian readers ever goin to join anyway. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 01:51 PM Post #20 |
|
Deleted User
|
Yeah I know mate but many of these people are vastly more educated than I ever will be. Yet I was able to look passed the wall of bulls**t put up by the press and see for myself what the EDL stood for and why. Almost every day I research that which I am being told is fact and I am making what I believe to be sound judgements based on the information/evidence that I am presented with. There are many (learned) people around the globe saying exactly the same things, some of who probably have never read each others work but the transcripts are almost identical when relaying opinions/facts about what is happening to this planet and its inhabitants at the hands of Militant Islam. It's frustrating and saddening when you see seemingly intelligent folk regurgitating the same detritus that they are being spoon-fed, which some of them do with such passion. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 02:33 PM Post #21 |
|
Deleted User
|
Comments disabled already. Arthur. |
|
|
| inter1324 | Jun 1 2010, 03:25 PM Post #22 |
Newbie
|
okk |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 03:28 PM Post #23 |
|
Deleted User
|
Probably because they were seeing a steady stream of people countering their article. The truth on its own doesn't usually sell newspapers. If it wasn't for DNA I would buy a copy, wipe my arse on it and post it to them.
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Jun 1 2010, 03:50 PM Post #24 |
|
Deleted User
|
2 people on train on way reading the guardian. pure stereotypes,just couldnt be bothered to waste me breath. way home,4 people sat there guardian on table ,same as, looked like theyd eaten WAY too many lentils.couldnt be bothered. tho id did cross my mind wether theyd been UAF protestg,tho they were clean. the guard come round and said me ticket was invalid for that train,so told her id been put on by transport police(you get a code wrote on your ticket).i saw em start looking at me after that, so got the paper and pointed out EVERYTHING that was wrong. they looked fkn terrified...honestly. theyre on a different planet. i told em if i was a violent racist id be in the nf! they never said a word. typical lefty tossers,theyre a danger to themselves tbh. look so mad when theyre in a crowd,when theyre alone they dont shout loud. remember the liberal who got raped and blamed the western white man ffs. FCUK em. leave em to it. theyre too far gone. the guardians failing like fook anyway,theyre laying off reporters left right and centre, the london evening standard gets more readers now. remember these figures are readership! circulatinns about 2/3 less as 2/3/4 people per household counts as readership. http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/News/MostEmailed/1006731/Standards-readership-surges-ahead-Guardian-Independent/ |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · EDL Chat · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
1:13 AM Jul 11
|
Feliz Navidad (Gold) created by Sarah & Delirium of the ZNR








1:13 AM Jul 11