| Welcome to Edl The Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Sexual Perversion in Islam | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 5 2010, 04:11 PM (416 Views) | |
| nolongersilent | Apr 6 2010, 12:52 AM Post #51 |
|
Patriot
|
i know - and they never can tbh.......... |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Apr 6 2010, 12:53 AM Post #52 |
|
Deleted User
|
those buggers seem to find a way
|
|
|
| Deleted User | Apr 6 2010, 12:56 AM Post #53 |
|
Deleted User
|
Well ujac you did say "no one in their RIGHT mind" |
|
|
| spirited | May 29 2010, 03:24 PM Post #54 |
|
Rules for men having sex with boys Man-boy sex is institutionalised to the extent that the Islamic rulebook specifies who should and should not be the object of a man's amorous attentions. Apart from the requirement that the boy should be beardless (bacha bereesh), there are also some restrictions regarding family members. From http://www.al-islam.org/laws/marriage1.html 2414. * If a baligh person commits sodomy with a boy , the mother, sister and daughter of the boy become haraam for him. And the same law applies when the person on whom sodomy is committed is an adult male, or when the person committing sodomy is na-baligh. But if one suspects or doubts whether penetration occurred or not, then the said woman would not become haraam. 2415. * If a person marries the mother or sister of a boy, and commits sodomy with the boy after the marriage, as a precaution, they will become haraam for him. In other words, if a Muslim dates a woman and finds her kid brother or son attractive, he must choose one or the other. He can't have both. |
![]() |
|
| spirited | May 29 2010, 03:32 PM Post #55 |
|
In Muslim societies women are kept covered in burkhas, so the prettiest things that most unmarried Muslim men ever see are beardless pre-pubescent boys. Beardless boys are not regarded as male, so sex with them is not considered as homosexuality as it is between adult men. http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/violent-muslim-homophobia-jihad-against.html ![]() Hanged for being gay Consequently, in traditional Muslim societies completely clean shaving is frowned upon, as it sends the wrong messages about sexual availability. If full beards (Taliban-style) are not worn, then moustaches are required. Muslim clerics are especially fond of little boys, and enjoying them is one of the perks of the job. Muslims get very annoyed if kuffars interfere with their rightful privileges. http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/news/Imam-s-family-custody-protest/article-1823117-detail/article.html If a boy refuses to have sex with an Imam, he can expect severe punishment. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/1453786/Acid-attack-on-boy-who-refused-sex-with-Muslim-cleric.html |
![]() |
|
| spirited | May 29 2010, 03:34 PM Post #56 |
|
http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/violent-muslim-homophobia-jihad-against.html |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | May 29 2010, 04:05 PM Post #57 |
|
Deleted User
|
Why should the EDL point out the failings of Christianity? The EDL is against Militant Islam. That is its main aim, that is why issues with Islam are pointed out. Why do you feel the need to highlight Christianity? Surely that's not the right approach if you want to get moderate Christians on board. |
|
|
| Deleted User | May 29 2010, 04:12 PM Post #58 |
|
Deleted User
|
Spot on |
|
|
| Deleted User | May 29 2010, 04:13 PM Post #59 |
|
Deleted User
|
Again. Spot on. |
|
|
| Deleted User | May 29 2010, 04:57 PM Post #60 |
|
Deleted User
|
it is nothing like christianity my friend.the teachings are not the same the gospels bring good news.the koran doesnt.let him without sin cast the first stone,that was for compassion to mary magdelen for adultry(not to say go and do it again but ,stop its wrong).forgiveness,we are all sinners.we are all slaves to wrong doing and sin that is what the gospels message is getting across.koran says stone them to death,man does not need to answer because he can sin. so my friend they are not the same.one is KORAN=hate/kill the other NEW TESTAMENT=is love and forgivness. EDIT:-when people commit the un thinkable it is not as if all religions are the same its because we are born of natural sin.some religions dont believe in that,so there you go again we are not all the same in religions. its the depth of your faith that gives you answers not thinking that we are all the same so its easy to answer. correct me if im wrong you are a muslim or a person who has no/or little faith in any religion. |
|
|
| blaked | May 30 2010, 07:53 AM Post #61 |
|
Paxi - Nobody is going to do their thesis work leafing through the Bible for all of the ridiculous tripe. I grew up going to church - what a miserable, sexually deprived waste of time that was. Now I know that most people these days don't obey Deuteronomic law and ban dismembered war vets from churches, but that doesn't justify Christianity. Most rational people just assume that the bit about the seven days, for example, was just allegorical, but then why put it in there? If the Bible is revelation and not just inspirational stuff written by Jewish historians and classical moral reformers, why not say 'well look - those old dinosaur bones you're bound to find when you dig into the ground were from animals that walked the Earth millions of years before mankind evolved'. At the outset, Islam did well to prevent some of the mistakes made by Christianity, such as the use of symbolism to fetishize Jesus'es family life. I consider the image of the crucifix morbid. However, it also started out much more violent - Islam's M.O. has usually been invasion followed by relatively benign (towards Christians/Jews) occupation in which the religion spread through tax incentives rather than through inspiration. There were periods when Muslim rule was relatively peaceful such as Muslim Cordoba, or during the Ottoman Empire when they had the whirling dervishes and whatnot. This doesn't happen to be one of those periods. When Muslims invaded peace-loving India, they killed, looted, took slaves, and destroyed ancient temples. Christians have been guilty of all of these things, but in India the scale was massive and the peacefulness and advancement of the preceding culture undeniable. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · EDL Chat · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
1:19 AM Jul 11
|
Feliz Navidad (Gold) created by Sarah & Delirium of the ZNR







1:19 AM Jul 11