| Welcome to Edl The Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| ban the edl | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 5 2009, 12:38 AM (156 Views) | |
| expat | Nov 5 2009, 12:38 AM Post #1 |
I post a lot of links
|
OK, as you know by now, the Labour MP Marsha Singh has tabled an early day motion that calls on "the relevant Government departments to come together to investigate and if necessary quash this non-political social movement" called the English Defence League. What they mean is ban them. Singh goes on to accuse the EDL - who as far as I have ever seen have always held their protests against the Islamification of Our Country peacefully - of trying "to spread fear, violence and hatred against the Muslim community". OK, so what do we know about this enricher called Marsha Singh? Well he war born in the Punjab in India and is now the Labour party MP for Bradford West with a majority of 3,026. His key voting record is as follows:- Voted to ban smoking Voted against an investigation into the illegal Iraq War Vote for hunting ban Last year his salary was £64,766 but he really managed to dig into the public trough and finally pocketed £303,040 after putting in all his "expense" claims. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 5 2009, 12:55 AM Post #2 |
|
Deleted User
|
Thats what pisses me off here,he is a muslim MP,why not show people he is against extremists and start trying to ban choudrys group?oh no they dont outrage him enough but the EDL who protest against islamic extremists mmmmmmmmm familuar story here. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Nov 5 2009, 12:59 AM Post #3 |
|
Deleted User
|
I thought he was sikh, that's what troubled me. Sikhs know better than anyone of the threat islamic extremism poses to civil society and other religions. I think it's safe to assume the git is motivated by funds from elsewhere, not just the expenses. I wonder who's paying him off?, wahabi saudi?. |
|
|
| AgeofEnlightenment | Nov 5 2009, 01:05 AM Post #4 |
![]()
Kafir
|
He probably is a sikh, but as reg74 said; is motivated by money and since there are large muslim communities in his electorate, he's going to pander to them. |
|
"A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything." Friedrich Nietzsche "All things must be examined, debated, investigated without exception and without regard for anyone's feelings." - Denis Diderot. "People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both." - Benjamin Franklin | |
![]() |
|
| haydenb | Nov 5 2009, 01:37 AM Post #5 |
|
He's just keeping in with his electorate, the crawler. One might ask, his electorate being largely Muslim, how did a Labour MP such as him get elected as his party took us to war with the Muslim brothers. Luckily for him, principle's and stop the war banners were put away for the day as his voters answered to the call of Labours generous social security benefits. If I see him drinking in Bradford again, I'll have a word on our behalf. And today, Marsha's going to be............... Edited by haydenb, Nov 5 2009, 01:44 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| DonkingDave | Nov 5 2009, 01:42 AM Post #6 |
Member
|
He was born in Punjab region of India where Islam is the largest religion. He has spoken in favour of Plastine, and against Israel. Treasurer All-Party Kashmir Group 1999-; Vice-chair All-Party Race and Community Group 2003-; singhmp@parliament.uk |
![]() |
|
| Reggie Kray | Nov 5 2009, 01:51 AM Post #7 |
|
Kafir
|
Yep, ban the EDL i say. All nutters
|
| [signature removed] | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 5 2009, 01:55 AM Post #8 |
|
Deleted User
|
The name singh though is specific to sikhs and apostates of sikhism only. Sikhism is by and large a race aswell as a religion so it has come to represent the sikhs as much as the turban. In order to be a muslim, I'm pretty sure he'd have to change it as most converts do. |
|
|
| nemisis123456 | Nov 5 2009, 01:57 AM Post #9 |
|
Infidel
|
Singh is not a muslim name. I doubt hes a muslim. |
![]() AFDL Supporting True EDL "The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson's time." --- Richard Nixon | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 5 2009, 02:10 AM Post #10 |
|
Deleted User
|
Well ,well mr singh ..now how much did that cost.to table. this moition.you nothing .us the taxpayer..a pretty penny..gesture politics.sound bites.still does not stop the real problem of islamist exstremists .now does it...there's a good lad..jog on.. |
|
|
| Flower Power | Nov 5 2009, 02:59 AM Post #11 |
Patriot
|
I agree. |
|
Those who will not reason are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves. Lord Byron (1788-1824) | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 5 2009, 03:10 AM Post #12 |
|
Deleted User
|
He knows nothing about us. All he knows is the propaganda bull crap, created in mass production, on a daily basis. If he knew anything about us, he would be out with us. |
|
|
| expat | Nov 5 2009, 03:49 AM Post #13 |
I post a lot of links
|
dosent matter who he worships (not money) its whats his motives. he knows very well how powerfull the muslims are becoming, hes chosen his side |
![]() |
|
| seppuku | Nov 5 2009, 04:03 AM Post #14 |
|
Forcefully stopping EDL would be a fascist action. From what I understand is that EDL isn't anti-Islam, although some members might be, which is expected when so few are going out and speaking against extremists in this country - not everyone will share exactly the same ideals. It is quite possible that it's money motivated, but it could also be just ignorance - anybody willing to listen to UAF will probably just think, "oh, they're fascist Nazi BNP supporters" and not think twice about it - not realising the BNP dislikes EDL, EDL dislikes the BNP,that they very much anti-fascist and dislike violence - hence the stance "extreme Islam must go" because it is both fascist and violent. From what I understand the top interest of EDL is peace and tolerance and well, tolerance is a 2 way thing - we can tolerant of Islam, but why should we be tolerant of any Muslims who are intolerant of us? |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 5 2009, 06:37 AM Post #15 |
|
Deleted User
|
It won't work... And what about freedom of speech? Radical muslims can demonstrate saying "death to the UK" but the EDL should be banned? Don't "we'll take their wives as booty war", "we want their blood", "god bless Hitler"... "spread fear, violence and hatred against the [non-muslim] communities? That's bullshiit. The people won't be okay with that. Cancelling the EDL will make people even angrier because it would mean that non-muslim people (the large majority) has less freedom than the others. Anyway. All of this proves that EDL makes the radical Muslims fear. And that's good. |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · EDL Chat · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
1:25 AM Jul 11
|
Feliz Navidad (Gold) created by Sarah & Delirium of the ZNR








1:25 AM Jul 11