Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Speculative biology is simultaneously a science and form of art in which one speculates on the possibilities of life and evolution. What could the world look like if dinosaurs had never gone extinct? What could alien lifeforms look like? What kinds of plants and animals might exist in the far future? These questions and more are tackled by speculative biologists, and the Speculative Evolution welcomes all relevant ideas, inquiries, and world-building projects alike. With a member base comprising users from across the world, our community is the largest and longest-running place of gathering for speculative biologists on the web.

While unregistered users are able to browse the forum on a basic level, registering an account provides additional forum access not visible to guests as well as the ability to join in discussions and contribute yourself! Registration is free and instantaneous.

Join our community today!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Large Mesothermic Birds?; How big can birds get?
Topic Started: Jul 14 2017, 11:20 AM (1,635 Views)
9Weegee
Member Avatar
Newborn
 *  *  *
I'm making a spec Evo project called the Lateoic, and the dominant species is birds. I want to make a large type of bird, but I need to know how big flightless birds can get.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Replies:
Fazaner
Member Avatar
Шашава птичурина
 *  *  *  *  *
Since you got carried out by rexy discussion, let me remind you of original question, mega birds.

Just like dragon said birds lack tails for balance, and that resulted in them moving hips forward to balance it. Now there is a deferent solution, change in posture of the animal. Therizinosaurs was a large animals, but unlike their relatives had shorter tails, they compensated it with more upright posture, like in picture i put down there, where center of mass is above hips thus maintaining balance. Of course bird would have to shift themselves even more vertically in order to achieve balance but i don't see it impossible.

Posted Image

As for feathers, there are a lot reasons for bird to keep having it, it is a protection from sun rays, in cold environments it can warm animal, important for sexual display of many birds, and i am pretty sure there are more of it.

Yes IIGS dragontunders made them here are they. One is displaying my idea, but i wanted to give a actual animal for example first. For the thing about hollow bones and size i realy dont know.
Projects (they are not dead, just updated realy slowly, feel free to comment):
-World after plague After a horrible plague unleashed by man nature slowly recovers. Now 36 million years later we take a look at this weird and wonderful world.
-Galaxy on fire. They have left their home to get out of war. They had no idea what awaits them.

My Deviant art profile, if you're curious.
Before you get offended or butthurt read this

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
9Weegee
Member Avatar
Newborn
 *  *  *
The scale impression's locations are known. The scales on the back were on the top of the animal, and the neck was found around the center of the neck

And yes, my original plan was to move them in a more upright position. Also, keep in mind that the maximum size would be around 45 feet tall, and they have long necks, so yeah
Edited by 9Weegee, Jul 14 2017, 05:31 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gojiratheking106
Member Avatar
Newborn
 *  *  *
I don't recall the paper mentioning the exact location of the neck impression nor the existence of a back impression. Furthemore, it said that feathers were possible in the back. Anyways:

I can see tropical gigabirds becoming scaly, or at least having elephantine skin, maybe with sparse feathers like an elephant or a rhino. However, I'm guessing that, if in the proect climate is like modern day, in northern places they would retain them, like mammoths.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Talenkauen
Member Avatar
Perpetually paranoid iguanodont
 *  *  *  *  *  *
9Weegee
Jul 14 2017, 05:28 PM
The scale impression's locations are known. The scales on the back were on the top of the animal, and the neck was found around the center of the neck

And yes, my original plan was to move them in a more upright position. Also, keep in mind that the maximum size would be around 45 feet tall, and they have long necks, so yeah
Those weren't found on the back, they were on the outer part of the illium, part of the upper leg. The legs, face and tail often the first parts of a dinosaur or bird to lose feathers. It doesn't discount at least some form of feathers on the upper back, back of the neck, and on the upper tail. They may have also still had feathers on their arms, at least for some form of display.
PLEASE NOTE: If I come off as harsh or demanding whilst talking to you, please tell me. I apologize in advance.....


UPCOMING PROJECTS:

Projects here
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Talenkauen
Member Avatar
Perpetually paranoid iguanodont
 *  *  *  *  *  *
Posted Image
PLEASE NOTE: If I come off as harsh or demanding whilst talking to you, please tell me. I apologize in advance.....


UPCOMING PROJECTS:

Projects here
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TAXESbutNano
Member Avatar
I'm going back to basics.
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
I believe the reasoning was that there are scales in all three of the 'integument zones' popularised by Saurian. Assuming the integument zones thing is correct, then the most parsimonious integument of a tyrannosaur with scales on legs, tail, head and body would be to have the whole animal be scaled. I'm personally on the side of the scale impressions being correctly-placed and the integument zones being correct, but there's a lot of room for doubt on either side.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
LittleLazyLass
Member Avatar
Proud quilt in a bag

Quote:
 
First off, the scale impressions are not as small as a "coin". they are larger

This is false, they are less than a millimetre, or far smaller than a coin and certainly not visible at a distance.

Quote:
 
and the top of the neck

The location of the neck integument is not known, it could be the top or bottom.

Quote:
 
not only that, but we can also find out that from other tyrannosaurs, with similar patches of scales

Is there actually anything properly published on in the literature about these, nevermind properly investigated, instead of undescribed stuff?
Andrea Cau has suggested here that the supposed scales might not even be integument and infact just taphonomic artifacts:

Quote:
 
That is, the skin imprint at that point shows a bend, suggesting a relative flexibility in the life-jacket, a bend that must have formed when the sediment has stamped against the animal's body. Curiously, the authors report that at the fold level, the skin shows a different coating, contrasting with the greater density of tubercles observed in the other parts (outside the fold) of the skin.
This detail is disconcerting: the density and distribution of scuppers is diminished at the level of that fold of the skin. Since it is unlikely that this particular fold of skin (we are in the abdominal area of ​​the animal) was a constant element in the life of that animal but was only a consequence of the general flexibility of the tegument that was accidentally deformed at that point, there are two options alternatives:

The bend was casually formed along an area of ​​lesser density of tubercles.
Tubercles are not original elements of the skin, but effects of decomposition and subsequent fossilization, partly related to the position and disposition of the skin.

The first option seems unlikely. Tubercles are too small and dense to think that they act like a rigid bond that limits the freedom of folding the skin. Moreover, since we are looking at a disarticulated body with bone-bony elements, it is unlikely that fold in fossil is something present in life, persisted in fossil. Therefore, it is suspected that tubercles are a product of post-mortem processes, such as decomposition, dehydration and burial.
If this doubt were confirmed, then the tiny irregular and randomly distributed tubercles we observe in the skin of these tyrannosaurids are not to be interpreted as genuine squatting traces, they are not biological structures, but are tafonomic artifacts, conditions linked to processes that, from the death of the 'Animal, they lead to fossil.

totally not British, b-baka!
Posted Image You like me (Unlike)
I don't even really like this song that much but the title is pretty relatable sometimes, I guess.
Me
What, you want me to tell you what these mean?
Read First
Words Maybe
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
9Weegee
Member Avatar
Newborn
 *  *  *
I hope this helps. and dont give me the "But those are in areas that were known to be scaly", Ive seen many god damn depictions with feathers in the scaled areas.

http://reptilis.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Tyrannosaur_skin_impressions-lite.jpg

oh and don't forget that this chart has been approved by many professionals out there.
Edited by 9Weegee, Jul 14 2017, 11:55 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Talenkauen
Member Avatar
Perpetually paranoid iguanodont
 *  *  *  *  *  *
.... Hmm.....It looks legit... At least, we'd better hope it's legit... For your sake.

So according to this, T.rex is at least 95% scaly? Basically elephant levels of integument. If that's the case, then what was up with Nanuqsaurus? How would it be able to survive in the arctic, if we can infer that it was mostly scaly?
PLEASE NOTE: If I come off as harsh or demanding whilst talking to you, please tell me. I apologize in advance.....


UPCOMING PROJECTS:

Projects here
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gojiratheking106
Member Avatar
Newborn
 *  *  *
I can't find the Tarbosaurus skin impression. The best I found is one that was too damaged to be placed in a position. For all we know it could be from the leg. The Tyrannosaurid skin from the chest and belly seem too close to the back, but I may be wrong. It also doesn't have the scaleless throat pouch from Tarbosaurus, but maybe it still hasn't been described? Idk.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fazaner
Member Avatar
Шашава птичурина
 *  *  *  *  *
9Weegee
Jul 14 2017, 11:54 PM
I hope this helps. and dont give me the "But those are in areas that were known to be scaly", Ive seen many god damn depictions with feathers in the scaled areas.

http://reptilis.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Tyrannosaur_skin_impressions-lite.jpg

oh and don't forget that this chart has been approved by many professionals out there.
Those are samples from 5 deferent species that lived in deferent environments, and they chose not to include the yutyrannus from china, and if they did it would have feathers all over. It's like looking if lions had mane, by looking on fur of tigers, leopards, jaguars and pumas. You can conclude that lion didn't have mane, I hope this explain this.
Projects (they are not dead, just updated realy slowly, feel free to comment):
-World after plague After a horrible plague unleashed by man nature slowly recovers. Now 36 million years later we take a look at this weird and wonderful world.
-Galaxy on fire. They have left their home to get out of war. They had no idea what awaits them.

My Deviant art profile, if you're curious.
Before you get offended or butthurt read this

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gojiratheking106
Member Avatar
Newborn
 *  *  *
I also think icluding Tarbosaurus may be a bad idea. Let's remember it lived in a desert (I think?), T.rex lived in a place with an average of 11 degrees celsius. The environmental differences can affect the feathers.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
9Weegee
Member Avatar
Newborn
 *  *  *
Nanuquasaurus probably hibernated/used less energy like we found in one t rex specimen, but probably on a lower blood tempurature.

It could've also migrated during the winter, like what might be true about Pachyrihnosaurus

remember, tyrannosaurs had lower blood tempuratures in the winter, and higher blood tempuratures in the summer
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gojiratheking106
Member Avatar
Newborn
 *  *  *
That seems a bit too complicated when it could be feathered because, y'know, it's its ancestral condition.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
9Weegee
Member Avatar
Newborn
 *  *  *
Also yutyrannus is not a tyrannosaur, its a very large proceratosaur.

Hell creek and the Nemegt formation were pretty similar in climate. (The nemegt formation is what tarbo is from.) Think of hell creek like the Louisiana bayous, and the nemegt is a wetland similar to Tanzania. The two medicine and other formations in Canada don't really have any cold areas. Remember that the Cretaceous was warmer than today.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Evolutionary Continuum · Next Topic »
Add Reply