Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Speculative biology is simultaneously a science and form of art in which one speculates on the possibilities of life and evolution. What could the world look like if dinosaurs had never gone extinct? What could alien lifeforms look like? What kinds of plants and animals might exist in the far future? These questions and more are tackled by speculative biologists, and the Speculative Evolution welcomes all relevant ideas, inquiries, and world-building projects alike. With a member base comprising users from across the world, our community is the largest and longest-running place of gathering for speculative biologists on the web.

While unregistered users are able to browse the forum on a basic level, registering an account provides additional forum access not visible to guests as well as the ability to join in discussions and contribute yourself! Registration is free and instantaneous.

Join our community today!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
The Biocene 2.0; Ten million years from now
Topic Started: Mar 17 2016, 06:43 PM (6,296 Views)
number8192
Infant
 *  *  *  *
The biocene

Global warming did us in, the sixth mass extinction(Really eight if we consider the End Botomian and Dresbachian ones.), desertified the planet's surface, and the oceans were deoxygenated, polluted, and filled with hydrogen sulfide.

The rise in temperature, predicted to melt the east antarctic ice sheet by 10 000 years in the future, made the equatorial zone and northern hemisphere basically unlivable, due to the heat moving to, and largely coming from,the north.

In the absence of humans, nuclear powerplants went into meltdown. Ocean currents caused radiations to move mostly upwards, making the northern hemisphere a heavily radioactive wasteland. The Yellowstone Supervolcano made North America almost entirely devoid of life.

The last days of mankind were spent battling over the last resources, taking out most of all megafauna and freshwater. Scientists and some selected survivors ended up migrating to the subantarctican islands and antarctica, trying to come up with new inventions that could potentially save them,but lack of resources and infrastructure, ultimately, did them in.

With a mostly desertified planet where the coast is toxic with hydrogen sulfide, Most of survivors were small xerocoles and generalists. The list of surviving tetrapods(Invertebrates, fungi, fishes, plants and so on are for the majority basically unkillable, evolve faster than tetrapods, and our knowledge on them is lagging behind, so they will not be the focus here, we don't know 90% of the oceans, after all.)had to migrate to Argentina/Chile, South Africa, Australia, Subantarctican islands and Antarctica to survive, with the latter two being only accessible to birds and bats. The list is as follows:

Amphibia:

Anura(Frogs from the Peruvian desert, African deserts and the Australian desert show frogs can be good xerocoles.)

Reptilia:

Testudines(Snake necked turtles and crocodile turtle only.)
Squamata(Basically unkillable, even the varanoids.)
Crocodylia(Dwarf caiman only due to living in semi arid climates, being more terrestrial and nocturnal than other crocodiles, and being small.)

Aves:

Passeriformes(Basically unkillable, especially crows.)
Coliiformes(Adapted to at least the Kalahari desert.)
Apodiformes(Swifts and some hummingbirds(Adapted to the Peruvian desert.)will survive.)
Musophagiformes(Mostly go away birds and plantain eaters, especially Criniferoides leucogaster.)
Caprimulgiformes(A few in south america, africa and australia.)
Cuculiformes(Quite a few, genus chalcites especially.)
Piciformes(Basically unkillable)
Falconiformes(Basically unkillable,both falcons and a few caracaras.)
Pelecaniformes(Basically unkillable, ardeidae especially, threskiornitidae as well and the hamerkop.)
Otidiformes(A few in africa only.)
Charadriiformes(Basically unkillable.)
Trogoniformes(Narina trogon only.)
Coraciiformes(Bee eaters especially.)
Accipitriformes(Basically unkillable.)
Gruiformes(Rails only.)
Galliformes(Quails especially.)
Tinamiformes(Nothuras only.)
Podicipediformes(A few in south america, africa and australia.)
Cathartiformes(Turkey vulture and black vulture only.)
Psittaciformes(Only Australian ones.)
Columbiformes(Basically unkillable.)
Anseriformes(Basically unkillable.)
Phoenicopteriformes(Greater flamingo only.)
Strigiformes(Basically unkillable.)
Bucerotiformes(A few, african grey hornbill and red billed hornbill most notably.)
Pteroclidiformes(Basically unkillable(Nearly all of them.).)
Suliformes(Anhinga novaehollandiae and a few cormorants.)
Ciconiiformes(African woollyneck and Black stork only.)
Aegotheliformes(Australian owlet nightjar only.)
Podargiformes(Tawny frogmouth only.)
Cariamiformes(All.)

Mammalia:

Chiroptera(Basically unkillable, though not the fruit eating ones.)
Cingulata(Hairy armadillos only.)
Macroscelidea(Quite a few.)
Dasyuromorphia(Planigales especially.)
Carnivora(Basically unkillable, families herpestidae and mustelidae especially, but also some smaller cats, foxes, gennets and some south american skunks.)
Monotremata(Short beaked echidna only.)
Notoryctemorphia(All.)
Primata(Lesser galagos only.)
Rodentia(Basically unkillable.)
Eulipotyphla(Hedgehogs and shrews(Crocidura only.) in Africa only.)
Hyracoidea(Rock hyrax and Bush hyrax only.)
Artiodactyla(Dik diks only.)
Diprotodontia(Sugar glider only(Sugar gliders can tolerate temperatures up to 40 °C, are omnivorous, and can live in heavily degraded forests.).)
Didelphimorphia(A few, Didelphis marsupialis and Didelphis pernigra especially.)
Lagomorpha(African hares, plus the european rabbit(in Australia only.).)

As the Ice age in 50 000 years emerged, the temperature cooled down to a more acceptable level. Birds and bats flew back to the main continents, mixing up the bird and bat distribution of every continents. 10 millions years in the future, the dominant orders ended up being Squamata(Mostly in the oceans.), Passeriformes(Outcompeting nearly everyone with their intelligence. A bit like we used to.), Rodentia(Filling most grazing roles, but also some aquatic ones with the rakali.)and Carnivora(Taking over most of their former niches.).

The future geological shape of the continents has the Americas separated from each other, Europe and Africa colliding, creating a huge desert where the mediterranean sea used to be, the eastern part of Africa separating into its own island, and a huge desert stretching across the sahara, middle east, ex urss, india and mongolia.By that time, rust, erosion, rot and storms, among others, will have reduced our constructions to little more than sediment layers filled with rust, styrofoam, and plutonium among other materials, leaving no trace of our civilisation. The Megafauna is as follows:

Sapient octopus:A social octopus that solved the reproductive problem of octopi(For the females, at least.)by having young octopi bring food to materning females, avoiding hunger. This social ability greatly increases their lifespans, but also their intellectual progression with age(Evolving human like intelligence by the time of the biocene.)and the appearance of culture as well. In very little time, they conquer the oceans as humans did the surface before.These are matriarchal animals as their lifestyle only helps the female's lifespan, leaving males to live the same way octopi do today, without culture, and interacting with females only for breeding. They look no different than the giant octopi today.

Greater madoqua:Descendant of salt's dik dik, this animal looks like an indricotherium, but no taller than asian elephants, and has the caracteristic even toes of artiodactyla(As well as the fur of it's ancestor.). It is weaker and lighter than an asian elephant, but stronger and heavier than a giraffe. It lost it's horns to time and has a nose resembling indricotherium's own, due to salt's dik dik already having a similar nose. It has thin fur over it's body, much like it's ancestor, and fills the role sauropods, elephants and giraffes used to play before.

Pantherinoid:Descendants of domestic cats, These heavily built cats replace the niche of smilodons, and completely dominate the arctic as apex predators. Their shape is similar to a smilodon's, but with tiger like canines and much bigger and stronger molars for bone crushing. They fear no one in the arctic and rivalise with other apex predators elsewhere.

Great rakali:Descendants of the rakali, these beaver like rodents replace the role of seals and otters before them. These animals, though entirely carnivorous, are little more than prey for the megalodonoids and pteronuroids, but dominate arctic and antarctic oceans nonetheless with pteronuroids. Their sizes are similar to the seals before them, and they look like giant beavers with more webbings on their hands and feets.

Hydrochoeroid:These hippo sized rodents resemble josephoartigasia monesi, but with bigger molars more adapted for grazing. They descend from various groundhog like rodents all around the world and overtook grazing niches like artiodactyla before them, with greater madoqua being the only other notable megafaunal grazer. They use their incisors for defense the same way a hippo would with it's tusks, and can deliver a powerful bite.

Greater notomys:Descendants of hopping mices(Tarkawara, more precisely.), these fill the niche macropodidae leaves behind, and largely look like them. Just like hydrochoeroid, they fill the grazer niches were they live. They use their hands to use simple tools.

Purussauroid:Descendants of the dwarf caiman, these purussaurus like caimans are 10 m long and are the biggest tetrapodal animals of their time. Sharing the armored underbelly of their ancestors, these crocodylians dominate the Americas and surrounding seas.

Megalanoid:The lack of crocodiles left varanoids to fill their old niche outside the new world. Reaching no longer than 7 m, these semi aquatic megalania look alikes lack the powerful bites of crocodylians, but have a venom that makes up for it. They are considerably more social than their ancestors, as well as more intelligent(Especially descendants of rock monitors.).Some megalanoids develop more webbings on their hands and feets than others, and are slowly developping ovoviviparity over time, foreshadowing their eventual evolution into the mosasauroid(A mosasaur like lizard.).But for now, sharks dominate the oceans unopposed.

Phorusrhacidoid:Descendants of many birds around the world(Like seriemas, caracaras, ibises, bustards, hornbills, flamingos and storks.)adopted large, flightless forms not unlike phorusrhacidae, due to the lack of predators compared to before(A phenomenon seen on many island birds today.). These are descended from ravens, and the top endurace hunters of their time. Unlike terror birds, phorusrhacidoids have smaller, thicker beaks, shorter necks, opposable thumbs on their feets, bigger brains and are no taller than 1.80 m. Their superior intellect allowed them to outcompete similar birds who could have otherwise filled the niche where they are. With working opposable thumbs on their feets, complex language, tool use, tribal organisation, incredible intelligence, endurance hunting, bipedality and sight and hearing as their primary senses, the future looks incredibly promising for these birds.

Dark raven:These 5 m long in wingspan ravens are completely black in color except for their red eyes.These nocturnal, intelligent birds are both predator and scavenger, and use their feathers as camouflage in the night sky.

Giant hyrax:Just like artiodactyla, perissodactyla, diprotodontia and proboscidea share the megafaunal grazing niches today,so will the candidates for top grazers in the future. The giant hyrax is a sheep sized hyrax and occupies mountaintops hydrochoeroid rarely frequent.

Creodontoid:Pale fox, fennec fox and ruppel's fox are the last remaining canidaes in the world after the holocene's extinction. Their descendant is shaped like a dire wolf with a pitbull's stout physique as well as a bigger snout. Creodontoids fill most of the former carnivoran niches.

Giant spiny mouse:With porcupines dead, mices of the genus acomys(Or spiny mices.)were free to fill the niche unopposed. They are sheep sized porcupine like rodents with scaly tails and shorter quills. They are nocturnal to avoid phorusrhacidoids, and are virtually unopposed by any other predatorial animals thanks to their protection, not unlike today's giant porcupine in Africa.

Titanophis:An almost entirely aquatic snake, titanophis is 10 m long(2.8 m less than titanoboa.)and goes only on land to lay eggs and occasionally snatch prey.It is slowly becoming ovoviviparous in response to it's environment, not unlike sea snakes, but 10 million years isn't long enough for the change.

Giant jerboa:Kangaroo like descendants of lesser egyptian jerboas, these jerboas fill the role of gazels in savannahs, and small camels in the desert, being lighter of foot than the hydrochoeroid, and not as energivore. They are smaller than greater notomys, as well as having bigger ears and eyes.

Chelodinoid:These 3m long turtles with snake like necks hide in the earth underwater, snatching any prey over them by unearthing their head and attacking with a snake like motion to bite their prey, which they bring under the ground afterward. They are descended from chelodina, a genus of snake necked turtles from australia who are fully xerocole(In at least 3 cases.)and look like bigger versions of them.

Pteronuroid:Descendants of the long tailed weasel, the least weasel and the egyptian weasel proved adapted to the water and took to it a bit like otters before them. These dominate the polar areas as leopard seals and polar bears did before them. Despite convergent evolution with otters, these are solitary animals except for the females with they're kids. Equatorial zones are inhabited too, causing fierce rivalries with megalanoids and titanophises. Thanks to lack of competition in either poles, and unlike otters, pteronuroids are able to measure 3.m long and look like relatively elongated sarkastodons with slightly bigger tails. Of the two, great rakalis evolved first, as rakalis are more aquatic than weasels, resulting in the descendants of rakalis reaching bigger sizes before pteronuroids could compete with them.

Sapient crows:Even more intelligent than phorusrhacidoids and dark ravens, these crows have reached human intelligence. As big as eagles, these crows make elaborate nests as complex as Paleolithic huts for their eggs, and make fires during the winter.

Megalodonoid:14 m long shark. In the absence of any competition(At least from tetrapods outside titanophis.),this shark rules the oceans as dunkleosteus terrelli(Among many others.)did before, with even sapient octopi avoiding them.

Giant galago:With no monkeys, galagos were left to take over the arboreal monkey niche unopposed, growing in size in the process. Unlike monkeys, galagos could venture on the ground like kangaroos, making them less vulnerable to deforestation. Their hands could be used for more complex tool use than greater notomys and giant jerboas.

Neoparrot:Descended from Australian parrots, These eagle sized birds developped human intelligence by changing situations demanding them to come up with solutions(A bit like what happened with humans.). Similar to sapient crows, but more terrestrial and live in smaller numbers in comparison.

As for the microfauna of the future, it will largely look like the survivors of the extinction themselves. The extinction will have largely affected their evolution as such:

More terrestrial habits for climbing animals(Gennets, sugar gliders, galagos, etc...) and swimming animals(Frogs, turtles, crocodiles, etc...).

Smaller sizes than was available during the holocene(Flamingos, crocodiles, storks, etc...).

More omnivorous habits for fruit eating animals(Turacos, galagos, parrots, etc...).

Less dependence on aquatic animals(Pelecaniformes, podicipediformes, suliformes, etc...).

As for land invertebrates, more or less the same rules as for the rest of the fauna follows. If it's either a jungle specialist or a freshwater specialist it won't survive the extinction unless it adapts. Mollusks and arthropods have the advantage of small size, at least some resistance to radiations, the fact that overhunting is nothing to them, the fact that some of those directly benefit from pollution, the fact that(At least arthropods.) they tend to evolve faster than tetrapods(Which means even jungle and freshwater specialists have a chance to survive.), the fact that some can survive even within the salt deserts(Brine flies.) or even antarctica as pure terrestrial residents(Belgica antarctica.), domination of the surface(Insects.) as well as the fact that the northern hemisphere would still be inhabitable for them on top of the whole equatorial zone.

Ocean life would have to endure anoxic events, like previous mass extinctions(Though it is almost impossible that the extinction will be as bad as the permian.), so anything that can survive that would survive the extinction, like fishes, cnidarians(who are even benefitting of this extinction.), crustaceans and mollusks, amongst many others, did before(Bottom dwellers would have a slightly easier time, but pelagic and coastal animals will be deeply affected, and megafaunas tend not to survive such events, even as bottom dwellers.).
Edited by number8192, Jul 8 2017, 07:56 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Replies:
IIGSY
Member Avatar
A huntsman spider that wastes time on the internet because it has nothing better to do
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
number8192
Jun 24 2017, 06:16 PM
1. Read my edit(Get used to those.).

2. Placoderms are bony fishes(Though did say ray finned fish, my bad.).

3. I know, i just doubt it would matter(It didn't for 358 millions years, even with leedsichthys around.).

4. It did in our case and in the case of marsupials vs eutherians(Plus sharks are more or less the smartest fishes around.).
1. That still doesn't make sense. Arthropods, mollusks, and cnidarians are all extremely different to one another and should be talked about separately. Hell, vertebrates have survived every mass extinction. By those same merits I could say that "non-mollusks are hardy and impossible to kill, it would take something greater than the permian to do any meaningful damage". But that's dumb. Many insect families died at the K-Pg extinction.

2. Bony fishes are actinopterygii plus sarcopterygii, which excludes placoderms.

3. Well, it does show that ray fins are no strangers to being big.

4. Is there any actual evidence that marsupials are smarter than placentals? And no, sharks aren't the smartest fish.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-most-intelligent-fish-1
Projects
Punga: A terraformed world with no vertebrates
Last one crawling: The last arthropod

ARTH-6810: A world without vertebrates (It's ded, but you can still read I guess)

Potential ideas-
Swamp world: A world covered in lakes, with the largest being caspian sized.
Nematozoic: After a mass extinction of ultimate proportions, a single species of nematode is the only surviving animal.
Tri-devonian: A devonian like ecosystem with holocene species on three different continents.

Quotes


Phylogeny of the arthropods and some related groups


In honor of the greatest clade of all time


More pictures


Other cool things


All African countries can fit into Brazil
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
number8192
Infant
 *  *  *  *
1. Point is, we barely know anything about what's in the oceans. Our overall knowledge of tetrapods far surpasses our knowledge of the oceans. And as i said, invertebrates evolve faster than tetrapods, so predicting their eventual form is much less predictable. The problem is not just that they could survive the permian, it's that we barely know anything about them.

2. A genuine thank you for this info(I didn't knew.), now bony fishes were never the apex predators in the ocean.

3. Leedsichthys show that even when megafaunal in size, actinopterygii are not apex predators(At least in the seas.).

4. Another deserved thank you, this is genuinely interesting. but for marsupial intelligence, here you go.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/plants-and-animals/animals/vertebrate-zoology/marsupials

Though this may discredit it, at which point such would mean the info is outdated.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941275/
Edited by number8192, Jun 24 2017, 08:02 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
WaterWitch
Member Avatar
Might manage to hold down a project some day
 *  *  *  *  *
I figured our edge as placentals was more of the fact we could actually let our offspring develop for longer in the safety of the womb, rather then having to give birth to tiny jellybeans.
Current Projects
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
number8192
Infant
 *  *  *  *
That and the placental reproductive system allows a huge range of diversity,like fins, wings, hooves, aquatic pregnancy and giant sizes.
Edited by number8192, Jun 24 2017, 08:07 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
number8192
Infant
 *  *  *  *
Once again, thanks Dragonthunders. A fish like Xiphactinus could evolve in the future, but i don't see it displacing sharks or reptiles(It didn't displaced the mosasaurs.), if cephalopods manage to reach human intelligence, they will make even sarcopterygii and tetrapods obsolete(In the sea only, corvidae and psittaciformes could also evolve human intelligence.).
Edited by number8192, Jun 24 2017, 08:32 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dragonthunders
Member Avatar
The ethereal archosaur in blue

Quote:
 
That and the placental reproductive system allows a huge range of diversity,like fins, wings, hooves, aquatic pregnancy and giant sizes.

I would rather think of the fact that they are rather geographically restricted, on the other hand some stuff you said seems that you didnt get deep into marsupial diversity, hooves already evolved once, just look to the Pig footed bandicoot, fins only evolved in very adapted aquatic animals, and maybe interesting. marsupials can evolve a placental-like organ, just look bandicoots,

Quote:
 
A fish like Xiphactinus could evolve in the future, but i don't see it displacing sharks or reptiles(It didn't displaced the mosasaurs.)

Is not about displacing, but more about that they could not be completely detained to evolve to predatory forms, even with high competition.

Quote:
 
if cephalopods manage to reach human intelligence, they will make even sarcopterygii and tetrapods obsolete(In the sea only, corvidae and psittaciformes could also evolve human intelligence.).

No.
Look. It is and always will be possible for animals to develop a complex intelligence that allows them to survive and thrive in an environment, but to evolve human intelligence is a step that is unlikely to happen, the development of human cognitive abilities has been a singular event in the evolution of life on earth which is unlikely to be repeated in another species unless certain events occur, is not a trend that will happen to the most intelligent animals that will emerge in birds or cephalopods after we become extinguished.
And do not try to explain to me that "special events have occurred that have allowed them to develop human intelligence" because you would already be at the limit of a forced explanation.

On the other hand, the intelligence and the development of a great brain tends to be a great disadvantage in moments of great ecological crises since it is due to invest the energy in living more than in thinking, reason why do not expect high intelligent species after a mass extinction because their ancestors probably would have become extinct or have sacrificed their intelligence for survival.

As develop human intelligence is not going to make them able to overcome advanced vertebrates, it does not work in that way.
Projects

"Active" projects

The Future is Far
Welcome to the next chapters of the evolution of life on earth, travel the across the earth on a journey that goes beyond the limits, a billion years of future history in the making.

The SE giants project
Wonder what is the big of the big on speculative evolution? no problem, here is the answer

Coming one day
Age of Mankind
Humanity fate and its possible finals.

The Long Cosmic Journey
The history outside our world.

The alternative paths
The multiverse, the final frontier...

Holocene park: Welcome to the biggest adventure of the last 215 million years, where the age of mammals comes to life again!
Cambrian mars: An interesting experiment on an unprecedented scale, the life of a particular and important period in the history of our planet, the cambric life, has been transported to a terraformed and habitable mars in an alternative past.
Two different paths, two different worlds, but same life and same weirdness.




My deviantart


Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
IIGSY
Member Avatar
A huntsman spider that wastes time on the internet because it has nothing better to do
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
number8192
Jun 24 2017, 07:45 PM
1. Point is, we barely know anything about what's in the oceans. Our overall knowledge of tetrapods far surpasses our knowledge of the oceans. And as i said, invertebrates evolve faster than tetrapods, so predicting their eventual form is much less predictable. The problem is not just that they could survive the permian, it's that we barely know anything about them.
For the last time, will you stop it with the "invertebrates". They arent a natural group. The term is completely useless. Its like saying "un-annelid" or "non-mollusk" or "not-brachiopod", ect. The rates of evolution across the different ""invertebrate"" groups varies extremely widely, with some even being slower than vertebrates.
Projects
Punga: A terraformed world with no vertebrates
Last one crawling: The last arthropod

ARTH-6810: A world without vertebrates (It's ded, but you can still read I guess)

Potential ideas-
Swamp world: A world covered in lakes, with the largest being caspian sized.
Nematozoic: After a mass extinction of ultimate proportions, a single species of nematode is the only surviving animal.
Tri-devonian: A devonian like ecosystem with holocene species on three different continents.

Quotes


Phylogeny of the arthropods and some related groups


In honor of the greatest clade of all time


More pictures


Other cool things


All African countries can fit into Brazil
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
number8192
Infant
 *  *  *  *
To dragonthunders.

I heard marsupials can only develop clawed paws because the baby climbs to the pouch after pregnancy, but if bandicoots can develop placental like organs, then sky's the limit.

There definitely will be predatory fishes in the future outside sharks, but there isn't a time at which actinopterygii was the top macropredator. I used to think dunkleosteus terrelli was the only exemple but his order was different. I imagine catfish, pirhana, swordfish, barracuda and electric eel descendants could develop into macropredator forms if their distant ancestors survive, but top predator role has never been theirs.

Evolution of human intelligence is not a trend, it is an event that is likely to happen if there are enough intelligent animals that manage to survive the extinction. The idea of every one of those becoming smart like humans is laughable, but on a long enough timescale, octopuses and birds could likely develop another extremely intelligent species, if only one.

To Insect illuminati get shrekt, we still barely know anything about animals outside tetrapods.

Also.

Is the holocene extinction enough to kill humans? If humans survive it would immensely affect everyone.

If antarctica(And antarctican seas.) is barely affected, humans and the bats and birds would have an easier time in general.

If the toba supervolcano manage to explode before the next ice age, it would make things even easier(Thanks to Dragonthunders for that one, i didn't knew prior to that.).
Edited by number8192, Jun 25 2017, 06:16 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
IIGSY
Member Avatar
A huntsman spider that wastes time on the internet because it has nothing better to do
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
number8192
Jun 25 2017, 05:38 AM
To Insect illuminati get shrekt, we still barely know anything about animals outside tetrapods.
That used to be true. We know have aquired such a vast knowledge on the animal kingdom. We have come a long way since Linnaeus you know.
Projects
Punga: A terraformed world with no vertebrates
Last one crawling: The last arthropod

ARTH-6810: A world without vertebrates (It's ded, but you can still read I guess)

Potential ideas-
Swamp world: A world covered in lakes, with the largest being caspian sized.
Nematozoic: After a mass extinction of ultimate proportions, a single species of nematode is the only surviving animal.
Tri-devonian: A devonian like ecosystem with holocene species on three different continents.

Quotes


Phylogeny of the arthropods and some related groups


In honor of the greatest clade of all time


More pictures


Other cool things


All African countries can fit into Brazil
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
number8192
Infant
 *  *  *  *
We still don't know 90% of the oceans. Sapient octopuses could already be there for all we know. As for not tetrapods on land(Not in something's digestive system, on land.), arthropods and mollusks do evolve at an insane rate. Though i don't know if land snails could survive what's coming. Any info on that would be appreciated(Nevermind, they aestivate like desert frogs. They'll breeze through the apocalypse.).
Edited by number8192, Jun 25 2017, 09:58 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Talenkauen
Member Avatar
Perpetually paranoid iguanodont
 *  *  *  *  *  *
number8192
Jun 25 2017, 05:38 AM
I heard marsupials can only develop clawed paws because the baby climbs to the pouch after pregnancy,

I highly doubt the validity of that claim. Marsupials use their claws for far more that just climbing into their mother's pouch (combat, hunting, digging, climbing), not to mention that mammals have clawed digits ancestrally.


Quote:
 
We still don't know 90% of the oceans. Sapient octopuses could already be there for all we know.



I hate that statement. I hate it when people use that statement. I hate the implications that a statement like that suggests. The shear level of handwaving ignorance that such a statement is so often used for brings my blood to a boil.

It's the same argument that people make when talking about the existence of sea monsters, megalodon, and mermaids. It implies that the countless decades of dedicated Oceanography and deepwater exploration, spanning innumerable miles of sea and seafloor, wouldn't be able to detect something as conspicuous a living megalodon, mermaids, or even a sentient octopus. It really doesn't work that way.
Edited by Talenkauen, Jun 25 2017, 07:33 AM.
PLEASE NOTE: If I come off as harsh or demanding whilst talking to you, please tell me. I apologize in advance.....


UPCOMING PROJECTS:

Projects here
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
number8192
Infant
 *  *  *  *
To TalenKauen Spec:

Marsupials use their claws not just for that, but also that.

Holy shit. I said sapient octopuses the same way i would have said cthulhu or aquaman, really. We don't know what's down there, i am not really making assumptions based on what we don't know. Please don't eat my enchiladas.

Sorry if i offended you.
Edited by number8192, Jun 26 2017, 09:11 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
IIGSY
Member Avatar
A huntsman spider that wastes time on the internet because it has nothing better to do
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
number8192
Jun 25 2017, 06:17 AM
We still don't know 90% of the oceans. Sapient octopuses could already be there for all we know. As for not tetrapods on land(Not in something's digestive system, on land.), arthropods and mollusks do evolve at an insane rate. Though i don't know if land snails could survive what's coming. Any info on that would be appreciated(Nevermind, they aestivate like desert frogs. They'll breeze through the apocalypse.).
I heard once that mollusks (presumably including land snails) actually evolve slower compared to other animals (though it was a while since I saw that, so it's by no means a valid conclusion).

Saying "we don't know what's down there" is a stupid excuse for hand waving anything into existence. If we have discovered thousands of small, inconspicuous deep sea creatures, I'm sure as well we would find a sapient octopus if there was one. And there is no evidence that one exists, and it's extremely unlikely that one does.

I have even heard people claim that we know more about the surface of the moon and even freaking mars than we do the oceans. Such lunacy.
Projects
Punga: A terraformed world with no vertebrates
Last one crawling: The last arthropod

ARTH-6810: A world without vertebrates (It's ded, but you can still read I guess)

Potential ideas-
Swamp world: A world covered in lakes, with the largest being caspian sized.
Nematozoic: After a mass extinction of ultimate proportions, a single species of nematode is the only surviving animal.
Tri-devonian: A devonian like ecosystem with holocene species on three different continents.

Quotes


Phylogeny of the arthropods and some related groups


In honor of the greatest clade of all time


More pictures


Other cool things


All African countries can fit into Brazil
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Talenkauen
Member Avatar
Perpetually paranoid iguanodont
 *  *  *  *  *  *
Insect Illuminati Get Shrekt
Jun 25 2017, 02:25 PM
Saying "we don't know what's down there" is a stupid excuse for hand waving anything into existence. If we have discovered thousands of small, inconspicuous deep sea creatures, I'm sure as well we would find a sapient octopus if there was one. And there is no evidence that one exists, and it's extremely unlikely that one does.

I have even heard people claim that we know more about the surface of the moon and even freaking mars than we do the oceans. Such lunacy.

^^^^ This


That's exactly what I told him.
PLEASE NOTE: If I come off as harsh or demanding whilst talking to you, please tell me. I apologize in advance.....


UPCOMING PROJECTS:

Projects here
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Chuditch
Member Avatar
Dasyurid
 *  *  *  *  *  *
number8192
Jun 24 2017, 06:16 PM
4. It did in our case and in the case of marsupials vs eutherians.
Actually, I think it was more luck that the placentals got the upper hand on marsupials. When marsupials reached Australia, they diversified, and then some placentals reached the continent. Why aren't they still there? The marsupials out competed them! If intelligence was such a big factor, the mammals would have out competed the dinosaurs. It is simply who can adapt faster and better to changing conditions, or who gets there first.

EDIT: Just read up on the placental, named Tingamarra. Found that they still are unsure of it's classification. Possibly new type of mammal perhaps?
Van Diemen's Land | Wollunqua | Coming soon...
My wildlife YouTube channel
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Evolutionary Continuum · Next Topic »
Add Reply