Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Speculative biology is simultaneously a science and form of art in which one speculates on the possibilities of life and evolution. What could the world look like if dinosaurs had never gone extinct? What could alien lifeforms look like? What kinds of plants and animals might exist in the far future? These questions and more are tackled by speculative biologists, and the Speculative Evolution welcomes all relevant ideas, inquiries, and world-building projects alike. With a member base comprising users from across the world, our community is the largest and longest-running place of gathering for speculative biologists on the web.

While unregistered users are able to browse the forum on a basic level, registering an account provides additional forum access not visible to guests as well as the ability to join in discussions and contribute yourself! Registration is fast, free, and instantaneous.

Join our community today!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Anapsid, Synapsid, Diapsid?; just a quick question
Topic Started: Mar 8 2012, 11:00 PM (1,005 Views)
Well, reptiles are classified by how many opening they had behind their eye socket, right? Say, if a reptile don't have holes beside their eyes and nostril, they are anapsid. One hole (on each side), then its a Synapsid (or Euryapsid). The Diapsid is even more confusing because modern examples has lost one or both holes (lizards and snake, respectively). The question is: aside from lightening the skull, what does the holes do? And why is it so important about it that they abandoned the Anapsid skull structure?

While we're on the topic, how do you differentiate between reptiles and parareptiles?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
Member Avatar
Adveho in mihi Lucifer
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
This idea is sorta of no longer considered valid; many "anapsids" might actually be diapsids that secondarily lost their frenestrae, for instance.
Edited by JohnFaa, Mar 19 2012, 05:38 PM.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
Member Avatar
Prime Specimen
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *
From here: http://rainbow.ldeo.columbia.edu/courses/v1001/8.html

"Fenestrae are thought to serve several possible purposes.
Most often they are to increase the area and improve the alignment or the attachment of major muscles.
They also serve to allow an area that expands outward for muscles that would otherwise be in a confined space.

They lighten the skull without compromising strength.

They occasionally have a gland in them, although this is unusual."
My deviantart page: http://amnioticoef.deviantart.com/
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
Member Avatar
 *  *  *  *  *  *
Mar 19 2012, 05:37 PM
This idea is sorta of no longer considered valid; many "anapsids" might actually be diapsids that secondarily lost their frenestrae, for instance.
If so, I suppose I may need to a rethink some of my views on amniote taxonomy.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Science Central · Next Topic »
Add Reply