| Speculative biology is simultaneously a science and form of art in which one speculates on the possibilities of life and evolution. What could the world look like if dinosaurs had never gone extinct? What could alien lifeforms look like? What kinds of plants and animals might exist in the far future? These questions and more are tackled by speculative biologists, and the Speculative Evolution welcomes all relevant ideas, inquiries, and world-building projects alike. With a member base comprising users from across the world, our community is the largest and longest-running place of gathering for speculative biologists on the web. While unregistered users are able to browse the forum on a basic level, registering an account provides additional forum access not visible to guests as well as the ability to join in discussions and contribute yourself! Registration is free and instantaneous. Join our community today! |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Biological classifacations; help! | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Sep 15 2010, 09:28 PM (893 Views) | |
| Dragon wasp | Sep 15 2010, 09:28 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Prime Specimen
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
okay i need some help to know what biological classifications are cause i think it is about time to find out...... i feel really stupid right now... oh and thanks. |
![]() |
|
| Pando | Sep 15 2010, 09:33 PM Post #2 |
|
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animalia Go down to the "Phyla" part. You have the whole texonomy system of Animalia. Classifications are a classification system for animals based evolutionary wise. Goes from Domains (Eukarya, Eubacteria, and Archea) to Species. Try this link for general taxonomy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_classification |
![]() |
|
| Empyreon | Sep 15 2010, 09:34 PM Post #3 |
|
Are you plausible?
![]()
|
Biological classifications are just scientific names given to a species or group of species so that all scientists everywhere can know exactly which species they are talking about. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_classification Edit: You beat me to the punch! Edited by Empyreon, Sep 15 2010, 09:35 PM.
|
|
Take a look at my exobiology subforum of the planet Nereus! COM Contributions food for thought
| |
![]() |
|
| Dragon wasp | Sep 15 2010, 09:36 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Prime Specimen
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
thanks guys! |
![]() |
|
| Carlos | Sep 16 2010, 03:15 AM Post #5 |
|
Adveho in me Lucifero
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
As always, I have a strong disdain for taxonomy and I suggest cladistics instead. Believe me, it is very simple and easy to understand; only those infected by taxonomic thinking think its hard. |
|
Lemuria: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/topic/5724950/ Terra Alternativa: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/forum/460637/ My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Carliro ![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Ddraig Goch | Sep 16 2010, 01:25 PM Post #6 |
|
Ar hyd y nos
![]()
|
I've never understood the difference. To be honest, I've been using the terms interchangably. |
| Save the Blibbering Humdinger from extinction! | |
![]() |
|
| colddigger | Sep 16 2010, 01:42 PM Post #7 |
|
Joke's over! Love, Parasky
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You really shouldn't though... It's like the difference between a regular car engine and a diesel... |
|
Oh Fine. Oh hi you! Why don't you go check out the finery that is SGP?? v Don't click v Spoiler: click to toggle | |
![]() |
|
| Carlos | Sep 16 2010, 01:49 PM Post #8 |
|
Adveho in me Lucifero
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
More like the difference between a car that works and a pile of junk. Really, taxonomy is barely compatible with evolution. |
|
Lemuria: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/topic/5724950/ Terra Alternativa: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/forum/460637/ My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Carliro ![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Holben | Sep 16 2010, 02:09 PM Post #9 |
![]()
Rumbo a la Victoria
![]()
|
Just get a load of cladograms then study them. Linnaen... doesn't bear thinking about. |
|
Time flows like a river. Which is to say, downhill. We can tell this because everything is going downhill rapidly. It would seem prudent to be somewhere else when we reach the sea. "It is the old wound my king. It has never healed." | |
![]() |
|
| Empyreon | Sep 16 2010, 07:07 PM Post #10 |
|
Are you plausible?
![]()
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cladistics Read up on both and decide for yourself. |
|
Take a look at my exobiology subforum of the planet Nereus! COM Contributions food for thought
| |
![]() |
|
| Pando | Sep 16 2010, 09:43 PM Post #11 |
|
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/Phylogenetic-Groups.svg I prefer taxonomy. No "monophyly, paraphyly" and "polyphyly", everything is done from an evolution point of view. If I am wrong, please correct me. But I really can't see how cladistics is better than taxonomy. |
![]() |
|
| Carlos | Sep 17 2010, 03:23 AM Post #12 |
|
Adveho in me Lucifero
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If you actually knew how both things work, believe me, it would be much different. But I will provide an easy example: the evolution of birds. In taxonomy, birds are considered a seperated class, while dinosaurs are within Reptilia. This poses a huge ass problem because, since birds evolved from dinosaurs, it is extremely hard to draw the line between Aves and Reptilia. In cladistics, on the other hand, since it doesn't recognise classes and all that crap and sees the descendents as part of the same group, birds are still dinosaurs, and one does not need to drawn the line in anything, just to classify the different maniraptor groups in clades. This, again, works very well because cladistics works on an evolutionary point of view, while taxonomy doesn't. Thus, in taxonomy, which was made in consideration of modern species alone, doesn't recognise the presence of chance, and thus one has to make distinctions between classes and orders and all stupid shit that really doesn't exist. For instance, where to make the line between brown bears and polar bears, when polar bears seem to be an offshot of brown bears and some brown bear populations are closer to polar bears than other brown bears? |
|
Lemuria: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/topic/5724950/ Terra Alternativa: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/forum/460637/ My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Carliro ![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Empyreon | Sep 17 2010, 12:54 PM Post #13 |
|
Are you plausible?
![]()
|
Cladistics illustrate a logical progression along evolutionary lines; as you point out, a bird is a dinosaur is a reptile is an amphibian is a reptile is a fish is a vertebrate etc. That integrated connection makes naming conventions very flexible but at the same time highly arbitrary. Taxonomy doesn't necessarily show the same relationships as seen in cladistics, but its naming system is much more clear and structured. Both have strengths and weaknesses and it's really only a matter of preference which one a person uses. I prefer to integrate the two so that taxonomy reflects cladistic relationships but can strongly isolate a particular group. |
|
Take a look at my exobiology subforum of the planet Nereus! COM Contributions food for thought
| |
![]() |
|
| Holben | Sep 17 2010, 02:54 PM Post #14 |
![]()
Rumbo a la Victoria
![]()
|
Naming structure- clearly structured for the beginner maybe, but i feel that once you've grasped cladistics it follows much more and the names tell you a lot more about context. And from the context, the name will spring. Although not the species name. That must be found. |
|
Time flows like a river. Which is to say, downhill. We can tell this because everything is going downhill rapidly. It would seem prudent to be somewhere else when we reach the sea. "It is the old wound my king. It has never healed." | |
![]() |
|
| Pando | Sep 17 2010, 02:57 PM Post #15 |
|
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Not for me. I think Empyreon has it right. Use both. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2















11:29 AM Jul 13