Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Speculative biology is simultaneously a science and form of art in which one speculates on the possibilities of life and evolution. What could the world look like if dinosaurs had never gone extinct? What could alien lifeforms look like? What kinds of plants and animals might exist in the far future? These questions and more are tackled by speculative biologists, and the Speculative Evolution welcomes all relevant ideas, inquiries, and world-building projects alike. With a member base comprising users from across the world, our community is the largest and longest-running place of gathering for speculative biologists on the web.

While unregistered users are able to browse the forum on a basic level, registering an account provides additional forum access not visible to guests as well as the ability to join in discussions and contribute yourself! Registration is free and instantaneous.

Join our community today!

Username:   Password:
Locked Topic
[ARCHIVED] Coconut Crabs
Topic Started: May 14 2010, 01:17 AM (4,029 Views)
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
As the Chinese swamp of 120 MYF nears its end (got a batch ready) I've been wondering about Coconut Crabs.

The coconut crab is unique among arthropods that as they went on land their gills didn't turn into body tubes, but is currently in a proto-lung. In the Postozoic it goes further and turns into a real lung, allowing them to grow bigger. What is the biggest size they are able to achieve and what diversity can they have?

I'm guessing that they will be able to grow as big as a lot of vertebrates as some seascorpions (including a 7 foot long one) went on land and arthropleura existed.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Replies:
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
The swampman uses its snout to catch fish. But if a carnivorous primate were to have the bite force of a crocodile (per square inch) then they could easily break open a future coconut crab. How would a terrestrial octopus fare against a smaller coconut crab?

Dropping on the ground would be hard, considering it is a swamp. They would either have to find a rock or slam it against a tree.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

See, rocks are better mitch. :P

Key word there Pando is IF. And it's a pretty big if. I'm sure if there was a lot of muscles around the jaws that the swampman could crush a crab's shell with its teeth. But I'm not sure why it would when rocks and trees are available.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
I'll start drawing a concept crab tomorrow, as it's 9 PM here. And I've gotta convert my Amy's Choice episode from .flv to .mp4 :P
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

"Amy's Choice"? What's that?
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
Doctor Who...
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
MitchBeard
Member Avatar
proud gondwanan
 *  *  *  *  *
Primates brains are way too big to allow for a bite force as large as a crocodile. Even with an enormous sagittal crest.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
Who said they need intelligence? Felines do well with not that much intelligence. Besides, with the mass extinction killing most mammals most prey (and all big prey) are of low intelligence, thus the mammals themselves don't need that much intelligence.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

Intelligence is a huge advantage though, which would allow mammals to retake the world.

Even with a decreased brain, the sagital crest would have to be quite large to break through a shell.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
The reason mammals didn't really take over (unless you consider the neo-reptile class mammals) is because it was too hot for them. At that temperature and moisture and mammal will go into seizure within 6 hours (it was featured on Yahoo).
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

True. But lizards are also adversely affected by the heat. There was an article published in the journal Science recently talking about how global warming is causing lizards to overheat and thus cause their extinction.

Besides Pando: there are mammals that do survive in some of the harshest deserts. Camels, oryx, kangaroos, meerkats, etc come to mind.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
But deserts aren't moist! Mammals can't exist in hot moist land!
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

Oh, I forgot about the moist part. Oops.

Yes, mammals don't do well with humidity. We're a dry group. I'd see amphians as dominating the moist areas. Assuming they survive, anurans would fare rather well.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
I have amphibians die in the extinction. I have got to get a 120 MYF thread up.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Rhob
Member Avatar
Adult
 *  *  *  *  *  *
Canis Lupis
May 15 2010, 10:47 PM
Just pure speculation. I'm not much for calculations.

It came from when I was talking to Metalraptor, who is a biology/paleontology major. I'm not sure how we came up with it, but it makes sense to me.
Okay.

As I've written before, I think another big disadvantage with arthropods (not exoskeletons per se) is their lack of a vascularized or "closed" circulatory system. This probably precludes bigger sizes more than the exoskeleton itself, since you need a bigger volume of fluid to maintain the same pressure differential.

Most vertebrate muscles don't seem to undergo drastic size changes between flexion and relaxation, so I don't see there being any real issue with having one's skeleton on the outside instead. However, I think Mitch has a good idea with "rewiring" the musculature of arthropod limbs.

Basically I think it's difficult to put a hard upper limit on how big exoskeletal creatures could get. So I won't try to do so. :P
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
MitchBeard
Member Avatar
proud gondwanan
 *  *  *  *  *
Definately a lot of PhD material in figuring out the upper limit of different kinds of arthropods :P
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Evolutionary Continuum · Next Topic »
Locked Topic