| Speculative biology is simultaneously a science and form of art in which one speculates on the possibilities of life and evolution. What could the world look like if dinosaurs had never gone extinct? What could alien lifeforms look like? What kinds of plants and animals might exist in the far future? These questions and more are tackled by speculative biologists, and the Speculative Evolution welcomes all relevant ideas, inquiries, and world-building projects alike. With a member base comprising users from across the world, our community is the largest and longest-running place of gathering for speculative biologists on the web. While unregistered users are able to browse the forum on a basic level, registering an account provides additional forum access not visible to guests as well as the ability to join in discussions and contribute yourself! Registration is free and instantaneous. Join our community today! |
| The Future of the Kinds (revamp); expanding TFIB | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 12 2010, 07:21 PM (1,391 Views) | |
| Canis Lupis | May 12 2010, 07:21 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.
![]()
|
Finally settled on a way to present my future evo ideas, of which there are many. I had a series of stories going on here a while ago called "The Future of the Kinds". They concerned themselves with RECON (a top-secret government organization) exploratory efforts into various futures of Earth. I liked the series. It's nowhere near done, but I personally didn't like the way the stories described the creatures. Sure they were life-like descriptions and I liked the creatures I came up with. But an actual project system will help get my ideas across better and faster. So I've chosen a few possible futures I'd like to expand upon. Note: in all scenarios, humans are extinct.
I plan to ask for a subforum for this just to keep everything organized. Anyway, I will first begin in Northern Australia. I've got creatures for "Land of Fire" pretty much planned out, so the other ones are my main focus. I will try to keep an average of five species per location per future. Though there is a strong possibility I will return to the area to explain some biodiversity and there is also a strong possibility that more than five organisms will be presented. It varies. And yes, I will update this. I'm not going to do pictures for this thing. I think trying to do those is what caused my other projects to crash and burn. I will accept fan art, but, for my part, I will only focus on straight write ups. |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Canis Lupis | May 13 2010, 03:39 PM Post #16 |
![]()
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.
![]()
|
Just because crocs have only survived two (P-Tr among them) doesn't mean they won't survive a third. Rats have only survived one extinction. By your logic, that would mean they probably couldn't survive another. Shrews and tenrecs. Forgot all about them. Actually, tenrecs seem to be better for what I had in mind anyway. Tell me: what is their global distribution currently like? Yeah, when it comes to coconut crabs, think of very crabby turtles. |
![]() |
|
| Pando | May 13 2010, 03:44 PM Post #17 |
|
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Mice have a better chance of surviving than crocs though. I think tenrecs only exist in Africa and Madagascar. |
![]() |
|
| Canis Lupis | May 13 2010, 04:00 PM Post #18 |
![]()
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.
![]()
|
Madagascar might be a problem. But I can easily work with Africa. They could get everywhere, save Antarctica and South America. Mice do have a better chance of survival than crocs (BTW, when I say crocs, I mean the whole crocodillian group. Not just crocodiles). But that doesn't mean crocs can't survive. |
![]() |
|
| Ook | May 13 2010, 04:05 PM Post #19 |
|
not a Transhuman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
caimans are pretty adaptibile....shrews are more possible than tenrecs,they can evolve into big variety of animals |
![]() ![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Pando | May 13 2010, 04:08 PM Post #20 |
|
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I prefer tenrecs. |
![]() |
|
| Canis Lupis | May 13 2010, 04:11 PM Post #21 |
![]()
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.
![]()
|
Especially since I'm planning a turtle-like group evolving to replace the extinct testudines, tenrecs are the better option. |
![]() |
|
| Pando | May 13 2010, 04:13 PM Post #22 |
|
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Tenrecs are insectivores though... |
![]() |
|
| Canis Lupis | May 13 2010, 04:16 PM Post #23 |
![]()
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.
![]()
|
True. Though I wasn't meaning herbivorous like turtles. Just a similar bauplan. |
![]() |
|
| Canis Lupis | May 15 2010, 10:08 PM Post #24 |
![]()
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.
![]()
|
Okay. Deadline time. Here's creatures for the North Australia portion of "The Rapture": Firstly, let's discuss climate. North Australia, after the Human Era, has become a tropical grassland. Typical wet and dry seasons. For the most part, the forests have all but disappeared. There are a few pocket forests scattered here and there (mostly nearer to the equator), but not as many as there used to be. As such, even with the disappearance of man in an instant, familiar animals have gone extinct. Koalas, cuscuses, tree kangaroos, etc. If it depends on the trees for survival, you can almost bet it's gone. The numerous introduced species man has released into Australia hasn't helped the situation. Pigs, rabbits, domestic cats, dingos, camels, and horses have come to dominate much of the Australian megafauna. Some of the original diversity remains, mostly in emus, macropods, and wombats. So: here's the creatures for this thing:
EDIT: Well, that's the North Australian creatures for "The Rapture" portion. Tomorrow or Monday, I'll post the South Australian creatures for "The Land of Ice" (since in both scenarios, creatures would be surprisingly similar, I'm shifting location so that we can see how Australian animals survive in a slight tundra). Edited by Canis Lupis, May 15 2010, 10:11 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Pando | May 15 2010, 11:25 PM Post #25 |
|
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wow, more descriptive than I could ever imagine. You even did a classification. You don't have a website why... (I suggest Yola) My favorites were the Throat Singers, Vombabara (wombats will take that niche if the small macropods don't), and the Kuringo (I love hyaenas, that's why I have them as the top predators of Gaia Mars). |
![]() |
|
| Canis Lupis | May 15 2010, 11:30 PM Post #26 |
![]()
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.
![]()
|
Thanks Pando. Longest descriptions I've ever done. Anyway, is anything off or implausible that you notice? |
![]() |
|
| Pando | May 15 2010, 11:36 PM Post #27 |
|
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
1) Throat singers would probably still use their claws, rather than beak as they do today. 2) Why would dingos loose their pack hunting behavior? Also, how many MYF is this? |
![]() |
|
| Canis Lupis | May 15 2010, 11:44 PM Post #28 |
![]()
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.
![]()
|
10MYF. I thought I mentioned that. If not, I apologize. 1) I can see the throat singers using their claws on occasion, but with their feet evolving more for speed rather than hunting, I figured that behavior would evolve away. Plus, the beak is a ferocious weapon. Have you ever seen an emu attack a human? It's fierce. 2) I honestly don't know. I mean, no canines (as far as I know) have become solitary hunters. But I have noticed that most big predators (tigers, polar bears, etc) are often solitary. Pack hunting behavior originally evolved as a way to bring down large prey animals when the predator was small. I assume that, as the dingo got bigger, it was able to take down larger prey on its own and pack hunting kind of went out of style. |
![]() |
|
| Pando | May 15 2010, 11:46 PM Post #29 |
|
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
But if the prey got bigger than wolves today then pack hunting behavior would stay. They can always get a smaller pack too. And the Gray Wolves of America and Europe are pretty big. |
![]() |
|
| Canis Lupis | May 15 2010, 11:50 PM Post #30 |
![]()
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.
![]()
|
True. Perhaps small packs would be beneficial, especially to take down a vombabara. There's enough meat on those bones for two kuringos and two kuringos might be needed to break through that shell. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Our users say it best: "Zetaboards is the best forum service I have ever used." Learn More · Register Now |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Evolutionary Continuum · Next Topic » |













7:39 PM Jul 13