Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Speculative biology is simultaneously a science and form of art in which one speculates on the possibilities of life and evolution. What could the world look like if dinosaurs had never gone extinct? What could alien lifeforms look like? What kinds of plants and animals might exist in the far future? These questions and more are tackled by speculative biologists, and the Speculative Evolution welcomes all relevant ideas, inquiries, and world-building projects alike. With a member base comprising users from across the world, our community is the largest and longest-running place of gathering for speculative biologists on the web.

While unregistered users are able to browse the forum on a basic level, registering an account provides additional forum access not visible to guests as well as the ability to join in discussions and contribute yourself! Registration is free and instantaneous.

Join our community today!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
The Future of the Kinds (revamp); expanding TFIB
Topic Started: May 12 2010, 07:21 PM (1,391 Views)
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

Finally settled on a way to present my future evo ideas, of which there are many.

I had a series of stories going on here a while ago called "The Future of the Kinds". They concerned themselves with RECON (a top-secret government organization) exploratory efforts into various futures of Earth.

I liked the series. It's nowhere near done, but I personally didn't like the way the stories described the creatures. Sure they were life-like descriptions and I liked the creatures I came up with. But an actual project system will help get my ideas across better and faster.




So I've chosen a few possible futures I'd like to expand upon. Note: in all scenarios, humans are extinct.

  • The Rapture - for some mysterious reason, humans just disappear. No extinctions. Humans just vanish from the face of the Earth in a split second. What will life look like in 10MYF?
  • Land of Ice - the Earth whips back into a new ice age, just slightly fiercer than the Pleistocene ice age. What will life look like in 10MYF?
  • Land of Fire - the current climate change becomes irrevesible. Ice cap melting happens so slowly that the ocean currents don't flip, which would cause a new ice age. Instead, the Earth warms. What will life look like in 10MYF (note: this is TFIB basically)?
  • Shooting Gallery - another asteroid, the same size as the K-T asteroid, strikes the Earth. Ironically, the same thing that brought mammals into dominance brings us out. Now, competing for dominance of the world, are surviving rodents, birds, squamates, crocs, and testudines (yes, you heard right). What would life look like in 30MYF?
  • Repeat the Past - the same conditions that caused the P-Tr extinction happen again. All areas of life are devastated. What will survive and what will life look like in 50MYF?
  • Life Support - Earth's oxygen levels rise to Carboniferous levels once again. This allows arthropods to grow larger and forests to expand. What will life look like in 30MYF?






I plan to ask for a subforum for this just to keep everything organized. Anyway, I will first begin in Northern Australia. I've got creatures for "Land of Fire" pretty much planned out, so the other ones are my main focus.

I will try to keep an average of five species per location per future. Though there is a strong possibility I will return to the area to explain some biodiversity and there is also a strong possibility that more than five organisms will be presented. It varies.





And yes, I will update this. I'm not going to do pictures for this thing. I think trying to do those is what caused my other projects to crash and burn. I will accept fan art, but, for my part, I will only focus on straight write ups.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Replies:
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

Just because crocs have only survived two (P-Tr among them) doesn't mean they won't survive a third. Rats have only survived one extinction. By your logic, that would mean they probably couldn't survive another.

Shrews and tenrecs. Forgot all about them. Actually, tenrecs seem to be better for what I had in mind anyway. Tell me: what is their global distribution currently like?

Yeah, when it comes to coconut crabs, think of very crabby turtles.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
Mice have a better chance of surviving than crocs though.

I think tenrecs only exist in Africa and Madagascar.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

Madagascar might be a problem. But I can easily work with Africa. They could get everywhere, save Antarctica and South America.

Mice do have a better chance of survival than crocs (BTW, when I say crocs, I mean the whole crocodillian group. Not just crocodiles). But that doesn't mean crocs can't survive.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ook
Member Avatar
not a Transhuman
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
caimans are pretty adaptibile....shrews are more possible than tenrecs,they can evolve into big variety of animals
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
I prefer tenrecs.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

Especially since I'm planning a turtle-like group evolving to replace the extinct testudines, tenrecs are the better option.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
Tenrecs are insectivores though...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

True. Though I wasn't meaning herbivorous like turtles. Just a similar bauplan.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

Okay. Deadline time. Here's creatures for the North Australia portion of "The Rapture":



Firstly, let's discuss climate. North Australia, after the Human Era, has become a tropical grassland. Typical wet and dry seasons. For the most part, the forests have all but disappeared. There are a few pocket forests scattered here and there (mostly nearer to the equator), but not as many as there used to be. As such, even with the disappearance of man in an instant, familiar animals have gone extinct. Koalas, cuscuses, tree kangaroos, etc. If it depends on the trees for survival, you can almost bet it's gone. The numerous introduced species man has released into Australia hasn't helped the situation. Pigs, rabbits, domestic cats, dingos, camels, and horses have come to dominate much of the Australian megafauna. Some of the original diversity remains, mostly in emus, macropods, and wombats.

So: here's the creatures for this thing:



Throat Singers
 
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Order: Struthioniformes
Family: Casuariidae
Genus: Camurius
Species: C. tralodis

Common names: throat singer, tralodis

Description: The throat singer is a descendent of the modern emu. In the 10 million years since the Rapture (the utter disappearance of all humans in a single instant. In no way related to Christianity's rapture), emus have evolved a primitive form of ruminance.

To digest the abundant grass, the throat singers sometimes swallow rocks like their distant dinosaur ancestors once did. These rocks crush up the tough grass in the throat singer's stomach. It's not the most efficient system, which is why they don't live completely on grass. They often browse on low bushes and sometimes munch on the occasional insect.

Over the millions of years, the emu evolved to be speedier to outrun the dingos and cats that were coming to dominate Australia's carnivore niches. As such, the emus went the way of their ostrich cousins and deevolved one of their toes. Thus, the throat singer possesses only two toes.

Also over the millions of years, emu males have perfected their modern mating ritual, leading to the sexual dimorphism present in the throat singers. Modern emus possess a primitive throat sac that they can inflate. This has been taken to its inevitable "conclusion" in the throat singer, which evolved a brightly colored pouch that it can inflate when it dances.

To further aid in winning a female's attention, the throat singer males have retained the white stripes that are present in their chicks. Chicks possess these stripes to aid in camouflage in the tall grass (a feature present in today's emus). But the male throat singers retain this as a way to impress females. And it works, especially when the wings are extended.

Throat singers, like their emu ancestors, lay large eggs, which catch the eyes of many mammals like pig descendents. To combat this, male throat singers stand guard over the eggs and, when a potential egg thief comes around, the male throat singer pounds the predator with its beak.





Leptaroo
 
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Infraclass: Marsupialia
Order: Diprotodontia
Family: Macropodidae
Genus: Macropus
Species: M. phroria

Common names: leptaroo, phroria

Description: The leptaroo is a descendent of the agile wallaby and, other than behavior and body size, hasn't changed much in 10 million years.

With the introduction of cats and dingos which, as previously stated, are coming to dominate the main carnivorous niches, some native animals became extinct. The macropods, speedy herbivores as they are, survived relatively unscathed. But, as the introduced cats began to catch up, even macropods were forced to change.

That's where the leptaroo comes in. Like the African gazelles, the leptaroo has taken to living in large family groups, taking the evolutionary creed "There's safety in numbers" to heart.

They try to keep the weaker and younger members in the center of the group when they feed so that the stronger members can watch for predators. When one is spotted, the entire group takes off, leaving the predator to pick and choose one member.

Groups are formed from bachelor groups. When males come of age, some males remain in the group. But some of the stronger males abandon the group. When they come upon a different group of leptaroos, they kidnap some females (just like zebra males do). This prevents inbreeding and encourages genetic diversity.

Groups usually number about fifty members with the largest recorded group being 100 members strong.

The leptaroos feed on grass and, in the dry season, low bushes when they're available. They're smaller than their modern red kangaroo cousins, standing at a height of four feet when on their feet.





Cerugis
 
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Family: Suidae
Genus: Cerugis
Species: C. rinokos

Common names: cerugis, ceratasuid, horn-snout

Description: The cerugis evolved from the introduced pigs. Similar to white rhinos, it has evolved to take advantage of the drier conditions present in the southern portion of the North Australian grassland.

They live in small family groups, consisting of about six members: the dominant male, his female mate (cerugis mate for life), and their offspring.

Both males and females possess enlarged lower canines to dig in the dirt, allowing them to uproot grass and bushes. This is especially useful in the dry season (which lasts longer in their range) because this act of uprooting exposes the roots which store an additional source of water. Males, as should be expected, possess even larger lower canines, used to deter predators (which will be detailed shortly).

The cerugis looks like an herbivorous entelodont. Well, actually, the cerugis is more of an omnivore. Especially in the dry season, the cerugis will supplement its diet of grass and bushes with lizards, snakes, toads, and insects.

Males and females usually leave their original family group when they reach sexual maturity, at which time they search for another male or female. A mated pair usually has up to four young every year or so. The reach sexual maturity in this same year as well.





Vombabara
 
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Infraclass: Marsupialia
Order: Diprotodontia
Family: Vombatidae
Genus: Thoraclunis
Species: T. eurosto

Common names: vombabara, thoraclunis

Description: The vombabara is a descendent of the wombat and is one of the few instances where native species have managed to outcompete the introduced varieties. The entire genus thoraclunis took the niches introduced rabbits had been expected to take: the small herbivore niches.

With the evolution of the thoraclunis genus, rabbits were forced to go the way of their pika cousins: small creatures that burrow, sort of like meerkats and marmots. But enough about the rabbit descendents. While interesting, I find the thoraclunis genus to be much more intriguing. And, of this genus, I find the vombabara (the largest member) to be the most noteworthy.

Standing three feet tall at the shoulder, the vombabara echoes the capybara of modern South America. While the vombabara isn't as much of a swamp dweller as its counter-part, it certainly resembles it, both physically and behaviorally.

Modern wombats possess a rear hump made out of cartilage. In the vombabara, this has been taken to its inevitable "conclusion". The cartilage has evolved into a hard shell made out of keratin, which covers the animals back as well as the rear. This echoes the doedicuris of prehistoric South America.

While not nearly as fast as any lagomorph descendent, it is this adaptation that has allowed them to largely outcompete the lagomorphs.

The vombabara, like most North Australian herbivores, the vombabara eats grass and, unlike most North Australian herbivores, rarely supplements its diet with shrubs.

Vombabaras are usually solitary and only come together in mating season. Males compete with each other for females by rearing up on their back legs and coming down on their rival's shell. The loser often comes away with scratches but rarely with any major injuries.





Nageru
 
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Carnivora
Family: Felidae
Genus: Nageruris
Species: N. acino

Common name: nageru

Description: The nageru (derived from the Maori word "ngeru" mean "cat") evolved from the domestic house cat (Felis catus). The domestic cats, being relatively unspecialized, have evolved to fill a wide variety of carnivore niches on Australia. From a pantherine hunter in South Australia to an otter-like fish eater in the East Australian Delta to a lionesque hunter in the Central Australian desert, the cat has diversified greatly in a post-Rapture Australia. And their diversity is well represented in the nageru, which shows remarkable convergent evolution with another felid.

The cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) is an African predator, famous for its short bursts of speed, averaging about 70mph. This is all made possible by the use of semi-retractable claws, a spring-like vertebrate, slender waist, and a deep chest.

The nageru has evolved very similar characteristics to its cheetah cousin. In response to its fast prey (such as throat singers and leptaroos), the nageru has evolved to catch up. While it can only top out at 50mph, it is able to maintain this speed longer than the now-extinct cheetah. The nageru's claws are also semi-retractable and it also has a spring-like spine. As of yet, the slender waist and deep chest aren't a characteristic of the nageru. But in another 5 or 10 million years, it is entirely possible.

Being light weight, the nageru can't kill its prey with sheer strength like its tiger and lion cousins can. Instead, it relies on sabre teeth and springboard-like back legs. This allows the nageru to sail through the air and, with good precision, land on its prey's back. The nageru's claws dig into the back and, like most carnivorans, it closes its mouth around the windpipe, crushing it and killing the creature.

Nageru often hunt in packs, ambushing their prey. Usually packs consist of three females, which bring the food back to the waiting male, which spends its day protecting the cubs. Like in lion prides, food is shared by social standing. The dominant male first, then the females, then the cubs get whatever is left.





Kuringo
 
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Carnivora
Family: Canidae
Genus: Canis
Species: C. hyenathos

Common names: hyingo, kuringo

Description: The kuringo (a combination of "kuri" (the Maori word for "dog") and "dingo") is, as the derivation suggests, a descendent of the dingo. With cats dominating the predatory scene, dingos remained relatively in the shadows. Except in a few rare cases (especially in the Central Australian Desert), dingos haven't snatched up the main predator niches.

The kuringo is one of those exceptions. Sort of. It does sometimes kill live prey, especially the vombabara. However, mostly, it will steal kills from the nageru or related predator.

The kuringo evolved its most defining characteristic because of its habit of hunting the vombabara and related species. Like the prehistoric andrewsarchus and the modern hyena, the kuringo has jaws of bone-crushing strength. This is because, like the prehistoric giant short faced bear, its jaws are shorter, meaning the ends of the jaw are closer to the fulcrum. This gives it a greater bite force, allowing it to easily crush bone and crush the vombabara's plates.

Unlike their dingo ancestors, kuringos are usually solitary. If two (or more) kuringos are seen together either a) food is scarce or b) it's a mother and her pups. Males and females only come together in the middle of the dry season so that the pups can be born in the early-mid wet season.

No breeding grounds are established. A male just actively seeks a female during the mid dry season. A litter of one to two pups is born in the early-mid dry season. The pups stay with their mother until they are able to care for themselves at one year of age. They reach sexual maturity at age two.







EDIT: Well, that's the North Australian creatures for "The Rapture" portion. Tomorrow or Monday, I'll post the South Australian creatures for "The Land of Ice" (since in both scenarios, creatures would be surprisingly similar, I'm shifting location so that we can see how Australian animals survive in a slight tundra).
Edited by Canis Lupis, May 15 2010, 10:11 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
Wow, more descriptive than I could ever imagine. You even did a classification. You don't have a website why... (I suggest Yola)

My favorites were the Throat Singers, Vombabara (wombats will take that niche if the small macropods don't), and the Kuringo (I love hyaenas, that's why I have them as the top predators of Gaia Mars).
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

Thanks Pando. Longest descriptions I've ever done.

Anyway, is anything off or implausible that you notice?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
1) Throat singers would probably still use their claws, rather than beak as they do today.
2) Why would dingos loose their pack hunting behavior?

Also, how many MYF is this?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

10MYF. I thought I mentioned that. If not, I apologize.


1) I can see the throat singers using their claws on occasion, but with their feet evolving more for speed rather than hunting, I figured that behavior would evolve away. Plus, the beak is a ferocious weapon. Have you ever seen an emu attack a human? It's fierce.



2) I honestly don't know. I mean, no canines (as far as I know) have become solitary hunters. But I have noticed that most big predators (tigers, polar bears, etc) are often solitary. Pack hunting behavior originally evolved as a way to bring down large prey animals when the predator was small. I assume that, as the dingo got bigger, it was able to take down larger prey on its own and pack hunting kind of went out of style.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pando
Member Avatar
Obey or I'll send you to the moon
 *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
But if the prey got bigger than wolves today then pack hunting behavior would stay. They can always get a smaller pack too. And the Gray Wolves of America and Europe are pretty big.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Canis Lupis
Member Avatar
Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the Earth.

True. Perhaps small packs would be beneficial, especially to take down a vombabara. There's enough meat on those bones for two kuringos and two kuringos might be needed to break through that shell.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Evolutionary Continuum · Next Topic »
Add Reply