| Speculative biology is simultaneously a science and form of art in which one speculates on the possibilities of life and evolution. What could the world look like if dinosaurs had never gone extinct? What could alien lifeforms look like? What kinds of plants and animals might exist in the far future? These questions and more are tackled by speculative biologists, and the Speculative Evolution welcomes all relevant ideas, inquiries, and world-building projects alike. With a member base comprising users from across the world, our community is the largest and longest-running place of gathering for speculative biologists on the web. While unregistered users are able to browse the forum on a basic level, registering an account provides additional forum access not visible to guests as well as the ability to join in discussions and contribute yourself! Registration is free and instantaneous. Join our community today! |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Practical Uses for Cloning | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 9 2009, 09:55 AM (1,362 Views) | |
| lamna | May 10 2009, 06:31 PM Post #16 |
![]() ![]()
|
I was sure that they were opposed to it, because they still "exploited" animals to get cells. 10 minutes of people faffing about a animal and the prick of a needle are very important social issues, while the ethnic cleansing in Burma is nothing to worry about. But PETA and groups like them love changing policy and opinions back and forth. Meat in vats was something Churchill wrote about in-between wars, and I think it will eventually be very important. Of course at the moment we only really have frog flavoured goo, but it is a start. Edited by lamna, May 10 2009, 06:35 PM.
|
|
Living Fossils Fósseis Vibos: Reserva Natural 34 MYH, 4 tonne dinosaur. [flash=500,450] Video Magic! [/flash] | |
![]() |
|
| Giant Blue Anteater | May 10 2009, 07:04 PM Post #17 |
|
Prime Specimen
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's the quote I think. |
Ichthyostega![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| lamna | May 11 2009, 04:15 AM Post #18 |
![]() ![]()
|
Not just a a quote, but his whole article about 1982. |
|
Living Fossils Fósseis Vibos: Reserva Natural 34 MYH, 4 tonne dinosaur. [flash=500,450] Video Magic! [/flash] | |
![]() |
|
| Temporary | May 11 2009, 04:29 PM Post #19 |
|
Transhuman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yeah, I think I read that. Weren't they talking about leaving the still living chunk of tissue from an organism suspended in a nutrient bath, then the cells would continue to replicate continuously? Or am I thinking of something else? |
I'm here. ![]() Uploaded with ImageShack.us Should we bring back Recon? Click here to share your opinion. | |
![]() |
|
| lamna | May 14 2009, 03:12 AM Post #20 |
![]() ![]()
|
I think so, back then their was a chunk of chicken heart tissue that was thriving and had to be cut back to stop it from filling its Petri dish, but to this date the experiment cannot be repeated. |
|
Living Fossils Fósseis Vibos: Reserva Natural 34 MYH, 4 tonne dinosaur. [flash=500,450] Video Magic! [/flash] | |
![]() |
|
| Giant Blue Anteater | May 14 2009, 03:41 PM Post #21 |
|
Prime Specimen
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Why not? |
Ichthyostega![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Temporary | May 14 2009, 05:04 PM Post #22 |
|
Transhuman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
1. It can be done to a limit. 2. The reason we can't recreate the indefinite growth is because we don't have all the information on the original procedure, and we can't figure out how that scientist did it. |
I'm here. ![]() Uploaded with ImageShack.us Should we bring back Recon? Click here to share your opinion. | |
![]() |
|
| lamna | May 14 2009, 07:09 PM Post #23 |
![]() ![]()
|
Perhaps we don't. I think it is more likely that it was a strange heart he too the tissue from, everything else in subsequent experiments was the same, though there may be some things we don't know about. |
|
Living Fossils Fósseis Vibos: Reserva Natural 34 MYH, 4 tonne dinosaur. [flash=500,450] Video Magic! [/flash] | |
![]() |
|
| Giant Blue Anteater | May 14 2009, 09:31 PM Post #24 |
|
Prime Specimen
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What about a clone workforce or a clone army? Personally, I think there are robots that do a lot better job destroying the incomming plasma tanks or building a new aquarium center. Plus there could be many moral issues with using mentally-numbed clones for doing all of the work. |
Ichthyostega![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| lamna | May 15 2009, 01:17 AM Post #25 |
![]() ![]()
|
Why is it that people think clones would be good for menial labour? They are people and would all be different. The only advantage to a clone army would be that the enemy could kill all your army with bioweapon tailored to affect mainly them, and so they could conquer with minimal civilian casualties. |
|
Living Fossils Fósseis Vibos: Reserva Natural 34 MYH, 4 tonne dinosaur. [flash=500,450] Video Magic! [/flash] | |
![]() |
|
| Giant Blue Anteater | May 15 2009, 02:50 AM Post #26 |
|
Prime Specimen
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yeah. Even they are based on the genetic code of one great worker, they will not be exactly the same as their clonal father, as mutations do occur when an embryo develops I think. Besides, people just love what they do for a career, it be building skyscrapers or serving in the army, so there is no need for clones who cannot even enjoy what they do and are basically mental robots. |
Ichthyostega![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Science Central · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2










3:32 AM Jul 11