| Speculative biology is simultaneously a science and form of art in which one speculates on the possibilities of life and evolution. What could the world look like if dinosaurs had never gone extinct? What could alien lifeforms look like? What kinds of plants and animals might exist in the far future? These questions and more are tackled by speculative biologists, and the Speculative Evolution welcomes all relevant ideas, inquiries, and world-building projects alike. With a member base comprising users from across the world, our community is the largest and longest-running place of gathering for speculative biologists on the web. While unregistered users are able to browse the forum on a basic level, registering an account provides additional forum access not visible to guests as well as the ability to join in discussions and contribute yourself! Registration is free and instantaneous. Join our community today! |
| Feathered Heterodontosaur | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Mar 20 2009, 02:59 PM (406 Views) | |
| Viergacht | Mar 20 2009, 02:59 PM Post #1 |
|
faceless fiend
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2009/03/tianyulong_-_a_fuzzy_dinosaur_that_makes_the_origin_of_feath.php So maniraptors weren't the only ones to have an insulating covering! I'd suspected this - it made sense, if they were also small bodied and warm blooded - it's nice to have evidence to back me up. What's interesting is that we don't yet know if they evolved their dinofuzz independantly or if it was inherited from a fuzzy ancestor. ![]()
Edited by Viergacht, Mar 20 2009, 03:01 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Carlos | Mar 20 2009, 04:04 PM Post #2 |
|
Adveho in me Lucifero
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Indeed, I think proto feathers (sort like quills) were an original trait in Ornithodirans, having evolved into feathers in dinosaurs and fur in pterosaurs
Edited by Carlos, Mar 20 2009, 04:04 PM.
|
|
Lemuria: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/topic/5724950/ Terra Alternativa: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/forum/460637/ My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Carliro ![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Giant Blue Anteater | Mar 20 2009, 10:29 PM Post #3 |
|
Prime Specimen
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There was evidence that Triceratops may have had a quilly hide. But now we had feathered ornithiscians? This proves that dinosaurs were more than just big lizards (they shouldn't be called "lizards" at all)! Pretty soon, we will recognize dinosaurs as something completely different from reptiles, thus killing the stereotype that dinosaurs were simply giant terrible lizards who enjoyed killing things for good. A Tyrannosaurus is just as different from a Petrolacosaurus as a mammoth is from an Archaeothyris. Now just imagine if baby sauropods were feathered, though we do not have evidence to prove it yet. |
Ichthyostega![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Carlos | Mar 21 2009, 02:40 AM Post #4 |
|
Adveho in me Lucifero
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Actually, there's evidence sauropod babies were scaled, so no, they lacked down |
|
Lemuria: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/topic/5724950/ Terra Alternativa: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/forum/460637/ My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Carliro ![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Giant Blue Anteater | Mar 21 2009, 10:11 AM Post #5 |
|
Prime Specimen
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I researched, and found this:![]() Which proves you right, but according to this source, the patches of skin preserved and found don't cover the whole body. Within the blog post I cited is an illustration of a baby sauropod with slight down made by Greg Paul in 1994. Enevitably, if something else was found with feathers when we thought it didn't had any, people will start asking if sauropods and other dinosaurs had any feathers. Personally, I don't think it is impossible that baby sauropods had feathers of some sort, improbable, yes, but not impossible. |
Ichthyostega![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Viergacht | Mar 21 2009, 11:00 AM Post #6 |
|
faceless fiend
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Did it say what part of the body that is from, Anteater? Perhaps they had scaly legs and/or neck and fluff elsewhere. |
![]() |
|
| Giant Blue Anteater | Mar 21 2009, 11:44 AM Post #7 |
|
Prime Specimen
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Source of the image: http://www.emfi.org/archaeology/dinoeggs.htm The part of the body the skin sample comes from is most likely the back, according to the article. At first, I thought it was the lining of the belly (what is it called anyway?). So I sort of contradict myself, since feathers were more likely be on the torso. But who knows? |
Ichthyostega![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Carlos | Mar 21 2009, 02:55 PM Post #8 |
|
Adveho in me Lucifero
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Probably they had a feather mohawk |
|
Lemuria: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/topic/5724950/ Terra Alternativa: http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/forum/460637/ My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Carliro ![]() | |
![]() |
|
| ATEK Azul | Apr 20 2009, 01:34 PM Post #9 |
|
Transhuman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
this is an amazing discovery and i love its aplications in evolution and taxonomical data. |
| I am dyslexic, please ignore the typo's! | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Science Central · Next Topic » |










3:33 AM Jul 11