| Speculative biology is simultaneously a science and form of art in which one speculates on the possibilities of life and evolution. What could the world look like if dinosaurs had never gone extinct? What could alien lifeforms look like? What kinds of plants and animals might exist in the far future? These questions and more are tackled by speculative biologists, and the Speculative Evolution welcomes all relevant ideas, inquiries, and world-building projects alike. With a member base comprising users from across the world, our community is the largest and longest-running place of gathering for speculative biologists on the web. While unregistered users are able to browse the forum on a basic level, registering an account provides additional forum access not visible to guests as well as the ability to join in discussions and contribute yourself! Registration is free and instantaneous. Join our community today! |
| Preferred Field of Science | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jan 7 2009, 07:09 PM (2,707 Views) | |
| Livyatan | Jan 19 2009, 07:09 PM Post #16 |
![]()
|
That was because, during those times, wasting your times studying insects was considered nonsense. Restrictions then were simply societal: being a natural historian still took little training or preparation, as it does to become a biologist or true scientist (someone who uses scientific method in their work, not simply observation). |
|
The grand Livyatan on deviantArt: link | |
![]() |
|
| lamna | Jan 19 2009, 07:20 PM Post #17 |
![]() ![]()
|
What are you talking about? Many clergymen were interested in insects, and study of them was not considered absurd. It's just nobody had done the observations yet. I'm a bit miffed at you saying that they were not true scientists, or using the scientific method. It's polymaths like that who invented the scientific method. |
|
Living Fossils Fósseis Vibos: Reserva Natural 34 MYH, 4 tonne dinosaur. [flash=500,450] Video Magic! [/flash] | |
![]() |
|
| Venatosaurus | Jan 19 2009, 08:01 PM Post #18 |
|
HAUS OF SPEC
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Magizoology
|
|
| |
![]() |
|
| lamna | Jan 20 2009, 03:31 PM Post #19 |
![]() ![]()
|
Is that like a nutritionist? Just a made up thing? |
|
Living Fossils Fósseis Vibos: Reserva Natural 34 MYH, 4 tonne dinosaur. [flash=500,450] Video Magic! [/flash] | |
![]() |
|
| Livyatan | Jan 20 2009, 04:31 PM Post #20 |
![]()
|
If you actually knew the definition of natural history you would know they are not true scientists. Naturalists are more like archaeologists: they do research and make observations but do not use the entire methodology that is expected of scientists. Within naturalist as an umbrella term, yes there are scientific disciplines who follow the strictest possible methodology. But naturalists in general, do not have the same training, methods, and status as 'true' scientists. Even if many clergy found insects interesting, it was still considered odd to make it your career to study nature, then it was like a gentleman's hobby. |
|
The grand Livyatan on deviantArt: link | |
![]() |
|
| lamna | Jan 20 2009, 04:46 PM Post #21 |
![]() ![]()
|
Or, nobody had thought to do it at that point. For me naturalists are much more real scientists. I realise the chaps we have today can learn more, but I associate better with "real" things. |
|
Living Fossils Fósseis Vibos: Reserva Natural 34 MYH, 4 tonne dinosaur. [flash=500,450] Video Magic! [/flash] | |
![]() |
|
| Venatosaurus | Jan 20 2009, 07:33 PM Post #22 |
|
HAUS OF SPEC
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Oh no it was a joke... Here's what it really is XD http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Magizoology |
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Viergacht | Jan 21 2009, 02:16 AM Post #23 |
|
faceless fiend
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Mad science. Mmm, but seriously, evolutionary psychology. |
![]() |
|
| lamna | Jan 21 2009, 02:38 AM Post #24 |
![]() ![]()
|
You mean like how because humans came from a rainforest and moved on every night that we assume there will always be food and we don't have to worry about our waste? |
|
Living Fossils Fósseis Vibos: Reserva Natural 34 MYH, 4 tonne dinosaur. [flash=500,450] Video Magic! [/flash] | |
![]() |
|
| Viergacht | Jan 21 2009, 11:25 AM Post #25 |
|
faceless fiend
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Among other peculiarities, yep. |
![]() |
|
| Paralith | Jan 24 2009, 10:51 PM Post #26 |
|
Infant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ah, but you will not be able to fully understand how living organisms respond to changing environments without an understanding of how they evolved and why, and how they may be evolving or will evolve in the future in response to these changes. No matter where you go in biology you cannot avoid evolution, so don't worry about it. I'm in grad school for evolutionary anthropology, and I'm particularly interested in behavior, which inevitably leads me to a lot of evolutionary psychology. (And on a side note, our ancestors haven't lived in rainforests for at least 6 to 7 millions years. The ecology which has likely shaped most of our current psychology is hunter-gatherers in a savannah/bush setting.) However, I'm leaning more towards non-human primates these days, so we'll see where that goes. Edited by Paralith, Jan 24 2009, 10:52 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| lamna | Jan 25 2009, 06:46 AM Post #27 |
![]() ![]()
|
Thanks, I read that in psychology book ages ago. It had weird ideas why horses are so popular with girls. And all science has to do is add to human knowledge. I does not need any other value. |
|
Living Fossils Fósseis Vibos: Reserva Natural 34 MYH, 4 tonne dinosaur. [flash=500,450] Video Magic! [/flash] | |
![]() |
|
| Paralith | Jan 25 2009, 11:25 AM Post #28 |
|
Infant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You have to be a little careful with evolutionary psychology. A lot of people in that field tend to think sex is the be-all and end-all of reproductive success, and with humans that's just not the case - we have offspring that require extensive care in order to be successful. They also like to use the western undergraduate college student as the ideal test subject from which to extrapolate to human behavior across the world. |
![]() |
|
| lamna | Jan 25 2009, 11:42 AM Post #29 |
![]() ![]()
|
I'm a bit iffy about psychology as a whole really. It's probably the science I trust the least, almost on a par with how most people view all science. There are many important things learned from it but it does not seem as real to me something like botany or astronomy. |
|
Living Fossils Fósseis Vibos: Reserva Natural 34 MYH, 4 tonne dinosaur. [flash=500,450] Video Magic! [/flash] | |
![]() |
|
| ATEK Azul | Jan 25 2009, 02:34 PM Post #30 |
|
Transhuman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i am a fan of biology and all the stuff in it. |
| I am dyslexic, please ignore the typo's! | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Science Central · Next Topic » |









3:29 AM Jul 11