Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Which of these is your preference....
Topic Started: Feb 18 2009, 03:46 PM (795 Views)
SL92
Member Avatar
DS Homebrew FTW
Right. I haven't touched a Zelda game in a while, (but I have been listening to the stellar ZREO stuff and miscellaneous remixes) and I've yet to beat three games in the series. The original Zelda, the sidescrollin' sequel to that, and Oracle of Seasons. (Or Ages, but I doubt I'll play through both)

Which of these three should I play first? Which is your favorite?
Posted Image
 
FireNeko
Member Avatar
Original Morshu of CotS
Out of those three, I don't really know what my favorite one is, seeing as I've only play the original Zelda.
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted Image
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

I have edited my post in this topic.
 
Acolyte_of_the_Hero
Member Avatar
A Dark Place

Play the first one first, than the second, then Oracle of Seasons, but I'd play Oracle of Ages right after it, seeing as they're sister games.
"Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not."
Posted Image Posted ImagePosted Image
c/o Kamigy, the Lost
 
SL92
Member Avatar
DS Homebrew FTW
Alright. I'mma play them in order released, then, and try and get my hands on OoA after playing OoS. Zelda II really scares me, what with being so tough, so I might actually beat OoS before it. XD
Posted Image
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Sounds good. Yeah, Zelda II is a bit of a pain. I think I had like 57 game overs, and you get 3 lives per game. It wouldn't be so bad if you didn't start ALL the way at the beginning every time you got a game over. If you're far, you've got a looooong walk to get back where you were.
 
CopShadowGuy
Member Avatar
The Night

Those Oracle games are awesome, but yeah, you should get both.
GET AGAINST THE TREE!!!
 
AlphaSpiritBomber2
Member Avatar
The Sage of Spirit

Like people said, Seasons without Ages and Ages without Seasons is terribly incomplete, but if I had to choose my favorite among those two, I"d say Seasons. It's really close, but I found Seasons was more exciting / interesting.
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

The only reason Seasons is better is because it does not have those pure evil zones.

I speak of
Spoiler: click to toggle
 
Vaxis
Member Avatar
Cash

AlphaWindja
Feb 20 2009, 11:23 PM
The only reason Seasons is better is because it does not have those pure evil zones.

I speak of
Spoiler: click to toggle
The three peaks of trading, backtracking, and guess-and-checking. Smart places though, when you think about it.

For a small little island, Crescent Island had a lot crammed on to it. Having to run around and trade your items for other ones that let you get around around, until you finally get them all back, that was fun. and genius.

Rolling Ridge was annoying. It occupies like 25% of the game, what with having two dungeons in it and a huge amount of items to get. Lots of minigames, lots of side quests, and the past and present versions of the mountains barely match up.

Jabu-Jabu wasn't too bad. Easier then the water temple, anyways. Easy boss though.

This is all making me wish that these games were made in 3D... They would be the best games in the series if they were.
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

It is true Jabu Jabu's belly wasn't bad, it just took me forever to find the first key. I put the game off for like two months just because of that key. I didn't find Crescent Island fun, just really annoying.
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

I'd say go with the first LoZ...Heheh..It gets back when you get to Lvl 6...

Man..I forget alot about Seasons and Ages...

I'd say play those two then play Zelda 2 last.

-Akari
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Hmm, I'd say start with the original LoZ too. The non-linearity is really appealing.
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

You gotta go with AOL first. If you can beat that game, you can beat any game ;)
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Temple of Time · Next Topic »