| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Temples and Priests | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 16 2009, 09:20 PM (1,399 Views) | |
| Astennu | Feb 16 2009, 09:20 PM Post #1 |
|
I'm kind of curious what opinions people have on what Atenist Temples should look like and what elements should be involved in them? I also want to know peoples opinions on Atenist Priests. |
![]() |
|
| Astennu | Feb 16 2009, 09:33 PM Post #2 |
|
Priests Purity In ancient Egypt priestly purity was very important as nothing impure was allowed into the Temple. Before entering the temple a priest purified himself with water and natron, which took place in a sacred lake which Temple precincts included. They usually wore clothing of clean white linen, clean/purified sandals, and everything he touched after that point had to be purified by Wa'eb priests. Some priesthoods went so far as to shave off all of their body hair and practiced circumcision. I agree with ritual purity, and that which enters a Temple should (when possible) be purified. I'm open to what people think a priests outfit should consist of, which is something we need to give some thought to. As for shaving all of their hair or circumcision, I do not think those need to be requirements. Clothing From my research they did wear white linen garments, and possibly white sandals. Wool was considered unclean as it came from living beings and could transfer impurities. Some priests did wear animal skins (which I would prefer to avoid), sashes across their chests, or a specially formed collar. |
![]() |
|
| Astennu | Mar 5 2009, 03:20 PM Post #3 |
|
A Modern Atenist Temple The entry way should be separate from the sanctuary (where the ceremonies/rituals are conducted), this could be as simple as putting up a curtain. The entry area is where objects (coats, hats, shoes, and such) of the mundane world are relinquished. There should be a purification area, for a time of reflection before going on into the sanctuary. Offerings could be prepared, or stored, here without distraction. There is the sanctuary, which is the most sacred place in the temple. This is the place where the worshiper meets Aten and a place where His power emanates from. It must be protected from hostile/negative forces and treated with reverence. It is here that the alter stands and the shrine that contains the sacred image. There should be an area for participants to retire and reflect on the ceremonies/rituals that have been performed. Traditionally this includes refreshment, so that we can share in the days offerings and partake of the blessings of Aten. Or course there has to be a library, so that there is a place to store books and to study without interruption. Another thing to consider was that the Ancient Egyptians believed that the orientation and alignment of temples was of great importance, as this was how the sanctuary was targeted to the cosmic realms where the Gods resided. This was also to synchronize the temple to the natural rhythm of the world. At the very least I think things should be oriented towards the east. |
![]() |
|
| Astennu | Jun 7 2009, 02:29 AM Post #4 |
|
I tend to listen to many people, and I have recently been trying to find out what people think about priests/gurus/pastors/teachers/etc. In doing so I have run across those who seem to think that a priest must be absolutely perfect in order to be a spiritual guide, and I have to put my two cents in. I think what people need to realize is that spiritual guides (whatever title we give them) are people, and as such they will be flawed. The difference being is that the spiritual guide recognizes that they are flawed and hopefully works to better themselves. They are in a position to help guide others, because they have been in similar situations. They have had bad relationships, they have had bill issues, they have had car trouble, etc. They have experienced such problems and learned how to deal with them, while remaining spiritually connected. This is not an easy thing to do. Just a few rules that may help you: 1. Do not underestimate your own knowledge. You will hopefully have a good understanding of the basics of Atenism (or whatever faith you may have chosen if you happened to just wander onto the forums), and if your prospective teacher disagrees you need to look at that basic knowledge. How fundamentally does that teacher differ or agree with what you know? How do they react if you disagree with them? 2. Avoid flamboyant traits in a prospective teacher. Do they advertise on the internet, with flyers, signs, etc? Does the prospective teacher tell you he/she is booked months ahead of time or that their students or clients include impressive (rich and/or famous) people? Any of those are serious warnings, as a true teacher/spiritual guide usually doesn't advertise (there is a difference between advertising and spreading the "word" about their beliefs), and would not care about fame or money. 3. There should be a connection between student and spiritual teacher/guide. When you are with this prospective teacher you should feel that this person is "right" for you and feel at ease when you meet him/her (besides maybe being nervous about the meeting, which is natural). If you don't feel at ease, or if your intuition says that this is not the right person, then just walk away (do try to be polite, though). If this person is a true spiritual teacher/guide they will understand, and if they don't they certainly are not spiritual guide material. 4. A spiritual teacher/guide is not a deity. No matter how great you may think a teacher to be, they are still human and no human as acquired all possible knowledge. A teacher should be humble. This does not mean they will not mind being called "Teacher" or whatever title the two of you feel is appropriate, but if they expect to be treated as a "Master" take it as a sign that they are not one. Treating your teacher as a deity will skew the relationship between student and teacher, even if they have not asked to be treated like one. Your teacher should hopefully be a gifted, knowledgeable individual who is deeply concerned about your spiritual development. A spiritual teacher/guide does deserve to be treated with proper respect and love. 5. Remain open to spiritual teaching. A spiritual teacher can only work within the parameters of a students life and potential. If you believe that the methods or beliefs of the potential teacher/guide are not effective for you, then search for another spiritual teacher. 6. Do not take rejection personally. A potential teacher/guide may refuse to teach you because they see that they cannot provide you with what you need, so just go looking for one who can. A potential teacher may react with some delay when responding to your entreaty, and you shouldn't take this personally either. They may simply wish to ensure your sincerity, consideration, or may simply make sure that you are not involved in an emergency situation that you cannot resolve. 7. Avoid any spiritual guide/teacher that makes you feel guilty, fearful, inadequate, etc. A serious spiritual teacher will try to be non-judgmental, to be accepting, and supportive. If you do not see these qualities, go elsewhere. 8. Dependency is inappropriate. A true spiritual teacher should know that everyone is capable of spiritual advancement, and should not stress their own holiness or advancement in contrast to your lack of those qualities. There are always other teachers/guides. 9. Sexual relations with your teacher are inappropriate! A healthy physical relationships takes place between equals, and this cannot be the case in a student-teacher relationship. A serious spiritual teacher should know better than to become physically or romantically involved with a student. 10. Beware immediate acceptance. Just as you should take time to evaluate your prospective teacher, so should they take time to evaluate you as well. It is possible that an insightful teacher will know that you are a great candidate, but this usually only happens in books and movies. Most productive student-teacher relationships develop over time. 11. Beware any requests for large sums of money. While a spiritual teacher may charge for certain classes or materials, a true teacher/guide will be more concerned with helping people or finding the right student. If you believe that the prospective teacher holds money as an important part of your relationship with them, then find another teacher. That does not mean a student should not help support a spiritual teacher/guide (they have to live and survive in this world as well), just that money should not be an important part of the student-teacher relationship. |
![]() |
|
| religionscholar | Apr 28 2010, 12:07 PM Post #5 |
|
Astennu I appreciate your input as an Atenist devotee and can see the merit (as an outsider to the faith) in your description of the ideal clergyperson. For the references you made to research you conducted on ancient Atenist clerical practices could you site your source as I would be interested to learn more. Thanks for your time. |
![]() |
|
| Ankhesenamun | Mar 25 2012, 06:40 AM Post #6 |
|
As Atenists we could certainly do with a spiritual leader, but, rather than a priest, what we really need is a Pharaoh! A good Pharaoh is someone who, besides being able to govern over a certain set of people, also has inner strength and wisdom and can guide people. This has been a topic of discussion before on this forum, but unfortunately nothing has been done about it yet. |
![]() |
|
| AmarnaGirl | Mar 27 2012, 08:56 AM Post #7 |
Administrator
|
Honestly,I'm not entirely sure myself how having a new Pharaoh would play out in Atenism today. Akhenaten was really the first (and last) Atenist pharaoh,and modern Atenism isn't practiced now exactly like it was in his time,(I'm not sure it could be,though I suppose if one was extremely literal and reconstructionist,it might be somewhat possible.) People's ideas on Atenism today are probably pretty different than the way Akhenaten had them. The idea of a Pharaoh for Atenism is an interesting idea,but how would it go? Would it be only the Pharaoh's ideas and practices running the show,or would others have a say in the development of Atenist practices? It would seem that with a Pharaoh,there would be one set way of doctrine for Atenism to go by (which is not entirely a bad thing,but sometimes doesn't work,as people may have their own ideas of faith.) As it seems now,if there are still practicing Atenists,then everyone's got their own "system" of Atenism already in place. (I'm only a bit cautious about having a Pharaoh for present day Atenism,because I was 5 years in another Kemetic faith that DOES have a "Pharaoh" in charge of the faith,and in the end,I was seeing some things that just didn't "gel",and it really didn't feel right.) This doesn't mean it couldn't work,of course,I'm just not sure how you could put it in practice - there's lots of workable wiggle room on this,but also lots of room for things to go weird. |
![]() |
|
| Maaritaten | Apr 27 2013, 07:24 PM Post #8 |
|
I think having a Pharaoh is a BAD idea - a historic institution best left in history. However I would love to see someone as a leader of an atenist society: maybe a title like "fan bearer on the King's right side' would be appropriate, with the leader acting as a steward of sorts. In a reconstructionist atenism I think it would be important to avoid introducing any formal requirements or doctrines not explicitly found in the hymns and prayers. One of the many beauties of atenism is the certainty with which it states there's is only one god worthy of wortship, but at the same time leaves the details up to every individual. Plenty of room for discussions and disagreements, but everybody still feeling united in faith in the living Aten. As for temples and rituals, I feel that it would best be reserved for when and of there is a sizeable community of atenists. When that day come though I agree with Astennus suggestions in full. Looking at the layouts of both Gempaaten and Hwt Aten we see a threefold layout, with the innermost court being reserved for the officiants. The many offering tables outside of the actual structures themselves would also indicate that any offerings made where shared among the faithful. A simple temple liturgy in our age could consist of one person chosen to act as an officiant, making the offerings, while the rest would act as chanters and chant and sing various hymns and prayer. The offerings could be as simple as some loaves of bred and some cartons of milk which everyone could eat and drink together after the liturgy is finished. |
|
'Let me be satisfied seeing You, Oh Living Aten!' - adapted from the Hymn of Tutu, Chamberlain of the Two Lands | |
![]() |
|
| Ankhemmaat | Mar 26 2016, 02:31 PM Post #9 |
|
Having a Pharaoh is a bad idea, same with a priesthood. Ankenaton's idea was to remove the priesthood from their exploitation of the people and restore power to the Pharaoh. At the time, those were the two powerhouses, Ankenaton chose to get rid of the corruption of the priesthood choosing the other option for a theocracy and he was the founder of Atenism. Now, we don't need a supreme theocratic leader because we can still get inspiration from Ankenaton as the founder, but having a Pharaoh is like Henry VIII and the Anglican church, he would very likely abuse that power for his own gain unfortunately. And another problem, would we be choosing a Pharaoh based on democracy or by heritage? Having a priesthood would defeat the purpose of Ankenaton's whole movement, which was to stop the worthless superstitions and exploitation of the people by a corrupt priesthood. We can all see evidence of corruption that emerges overtime, take the Catholic church for instance. Unfortunately, people are greedy and I doubt an Atenist priesthood would be exempt from this. |
| The concept of "self" as a singular and coherent entity is a fictional construct, and an individual rather comprises conflicting tensions and knowledge claims (e.g. gender, class, profession, etc). The interpretation of meaning of a text is therefore dependent on a reader's own personal concept of self. | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Religion Of Atenism · Next Topic » |






8:27 PM Jul 10