APEC 2009

Welcome to Alternate History Rp. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Just remember to sign up as the name of an available nation.

Alternate History is Geo-Political Role Playing Game where you may take control of a real life nation and role play that country out.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

APEC 2009
Topic Started: Nov 23 2008, 05:45 PM (18 Views)
Peru	Nov 23 2008, 05:45 PM Post #1
Super Power Posts: 1,357 Group: Members (NATO) Member #10 Joined: Oct 2, 2008	OOC: Since we all KNOW APEC won't be able to be fully accomplished, I'll start listing some of it's accomplishments, with links to prove it, and seriously, I'm still going HOLY **** at what they promised. -100 thousand million(100 Billion O_O) in investments in Peru over 5 years. Proof in Spanish -FTA with USA to take effect as soon as Obama enters office. More proof in Spanish -Peru, USA, and Australia to join the P4(Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership, which is basically a FTA) by 2010-even more proof, this time in english That's really anything meaningful that doesn't have to do anything with the financial crisis that never happened. Also, we're all going to assume Barack Obama took office, I guess?



Peoples Republic of China	Nov 23 2008, 07:35 PM Post #2
Hyper Power Posts: 2,581 Group: Members Member #12 Joined: Oct 2, 2008	A free trade agreement to take place as soon as obama gets into office. That sounds unrealistic. Obama has said he was against the Colombian deal and I see no reason why he would like this one any better.



Peru	Nov 23 2008, 07:57 PM Post #3
Super Power Posts: 1,357 Group: Members (NATO) Member #10 Joined: Oct 2, 2008	OOC: I saw the second debate, he was pro-Peruvian FTA, I'll get a copy of the debate and prove it if you bug me about it too much.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Diplomacy and Foreign Affairs · Next Topic »