The Sung Phantom Class

Welcome to Alternate History Rp. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Just remember to sign up as the name of an available nation.

Alternate History is Geo-Political Role Playing Game where you may take control of a real life nation and role play that country out.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

The Sung Phantom Class; Air-craft Carrier
Topic Started: Nov 18 2008, 06:46 PM (42 Views)
South Korea	Nov 18 2008, 06:46 PM Post #1
Super Power Posts: 1,417 Group: World Council Member #28 Joined: Oct 4, 2008 Currency Won - ₩ Capital Seoul Population 49,044,790 GDP (Nominal) $969.871 Billion Nominal Per Capita $20,015	Sung Phantom Class Specs: 50 000-55 000 tonnes standard 60 600-70 000 tonnes full load Length: 300 metres overall 270 metres at waterline Beam: 73 metres overall 35 metres at waterline Draft: 11 metres Powerplant: 4 PBMR Reactors Propellers: 4 with fixed pitch Speed: 34 knots Endurance: 90 Days Food with full crew. Range: Vitually Unlimited Complement: 1960 crew 626 air group Armament: 20-24 Surface to air missiles, three Thales 30 mm Goalkeeper, Thales jamming system and ECM system CIWS, Decoy flares Aircraft: 30 Lockheed F-16 Fighting Falcon 20 McDonnell-Douglas F-4 Phantom II 15 Mikoyan MiG-29A 5 W-3 These are what were aiming for. We expect to finish the plans in 2009-10 and the first bit of steel will be cut about 2010-11, if it does go through we expect it to be finished in 2013-14 and production the following year. Were looking for engineers and carrier designers from other countries to help design this carrier and hopefully speed up the finishing date. Edited by South Korea, Nov 18 2008, 06:47 PM.



Peoples Republic of China	Nov 18 2008, 06:58 PM Post #2
Hyper Power Posts: 2,581 Group: Members Member #12 Joined: Oct 2, 2008	OOC The F16 is not carrier capable.



South Korea	Nov 18 2008, 10:34 PM Post #3
Super Power Posts: 1,417 Group: World Council Member #28 Joined: Oct 4, 2008 Currency Won - ₩ Capital Seoul Population 49,044,790 GDP (Nominal) $969.871 Billion Nominal Per Capita $20,015	Peoples Republic of China Nov 18 2008, 06:58 PM OOC The F16 is not carrier capable. OOC:It's old, i'll make changes later.



Japan	Nov 19 2008, 05:48 PM Post #4
Hot and Runny Posts: 3,104 Group: World Council Member #8 Joined: Oct 2, 2008 Currency Yen 円 Capital Tokyo Population 127,433,494(2007 census) GDP (Nominal) $4.886 trillion(2007 Estimate) Nominal Per Capita $38,341	OOC: If you mean changes to the aircraft, then you'll have to get Americas request to start tampering with their technology.



South Korea	Nov 19 2008, 10:26 PM Post #5
Super Power Posts: 1,417 Group: World Council Member #28 Joined: Oct 4, 2008 Currency Won - ₩ Capital Seoul Population 49,044,790 GDP (Nominal) $969.871 Billion Nominal Per Capita $20,015	Japan Nov 19 2008, 05:48 PM OOC: If you mean changes to the aircraft, then you'll have to get Americas request to start tampering with their technology. OOC:I meant changing the aircraft i'll put on.



Japan	Nov 20 2008, 03:59 PM Post #6
Hot and Runny Posts: 3,104 Group: World Council Member #8 Joined: Oct 2, 2008 Currency Yen 円 Capital Tokyo Population 127,433,494(2007 census) GDP (Nominal) $4.886 trillion(2007 Estimate) Nominal Per Capita $38,341	OOC: But why does it say F-16 in the first place, if their not even able to be used on a carrier?



South Korea	Nov 24 2008, 06:30 PM Post #7
Super Power Posts: 1,417 Group: World Council Member #28 Joined: Oct 4, 2008 Currency Won - ₩ Capital Seoul Population 49,044,790 GDP (Nominal) $969.871 Billion Nominal Per Capita $20,015	Japan Nov 20 2008, 03:59 PM OOC: But why does it say F-16 in the first place, if their not even able to be used on a carrier? Cause it was like that when i found some stats.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Research and Development · Next Topic »