| Welcome to Alternate History Rp. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Just remember to sign up as the name of an available nation. Alternate History is Geo-Political Role Playing Game where you may take control of a real life nation and role play that country out. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Mitsubishi F-3 | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Oct 6 2008, 08:59 PM (50 Views) | |
| Japan | Oct 6 2008, 08:59 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Hot and Runny
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A new fighter project has begun to complement, and in time, replace the F-2s in service and in production. This will be the Mitsubishi F-3 Viper Strike. Initial specs: Crew: One and two pilot versions for different mission types Length: 16.27 m Wingspan: 11.70 m Height: 5.15 m Wing area: 35.84 m² Powerplant: Engines: 2x MTU Engineering RSAI-A1 afterburning turbofan, 30,000 lbs thrust each Performance Maximum speed: Mach 2.5 at altitude Range: 1540 km on anti-ship mission Service ceiling 20,000 m Thrust/weight: 0.89 Armament There will be two JM61A1 cannons, both side-by-side in the nose of the aircraft. Compatible with most missiles, like the AIM-9 Sidewinder, although the AA3 Mitsubishi AAM-3 will totaly replace the sidewinder. Air-to-ground missiles, and anti-ship missiles. Various freefall bombs with CGS-1 IIR seeker heads. Avionics Mitsubishi Active Electronically Scanned Array radar system. Differences from the F-2: Bigger payload, faster, bigger range, and a bigger surface area in general, + other smaller changes. |
![]() |
|
| South Korea | Oct 7 2008, 04:33 PM Post #2 |
|
Super Power
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
South Korea Would like to help make this fighter with Japan. Hopefully we can get it to a 5th Generation class fighter. |
![]() |
|
| Japan | Oct 7 2008, 04:35 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Hot and Runny
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
hm..... What expertise can you offer in Fighter production? OOC: hopefully, this will also get it out faster
|
![]() |
|
| Israel | Oct 7 2008, 04:42 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Super Power
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Would the F-3 be based off the F-16 like the F-2 as well ? |
![]() |
|
| Japan | Oct 7 2008, 04:46 PM Post #5 |
![]()
Hot and Runny
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The F-3 will be more of an improvement of the F-2 then the F-16.... :S Well, basicly, in Mk.2 i was wondering whether this would be a 5 or 4.75gen. Not F-22 5th gen, but more F-35 qaulity. It was either that, or a 4.75Gen which would be a new gen for fighter, so i dunno where to place it really. |
![]() |
|
| South Korea | Oct 13 2008, 03:03 PM Post #6 |
|
Super Power
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
5th Gen systems and Speed |
![]() |
|
| Japan | Oct 13 2008, 03:43 PM Post #7 |
![]()
Hot and Runny
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
OOC: I already ahve 5th gen stuff going into the Shinshin. anything else? *nudge whisper* funding and stuff like that
|
![]() |
|
| Japan | Nov 4 2008, 10:01 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Hot and Runny
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
OOC: well, after looking around on the interwebs, it seems to me that the Shinshin is the codename for the F-3. If that is so, then i've wasted a lot of time on this -.- http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=142675 http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=91190 Edited by Japan, Nov 4 2008, 10:04 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Japan | Nov 4 2008, 10:08 PM Post #9 |
![]()
Hot and Runny
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes.... well, that's enough proof for me -.- Anyone also have any thoughts about that F-36 design that was there? to me, it looks a lot like a single engine version on the YF-23... |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Research and Development · Next Topic » |





![]](http://209.85.62.24/static/1/pip_r.png)




1:55 PM Dec 5