Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4
Beer Drinking woman to be cained
Topic Started: Sep 28 2009, 09:26 AM (1,057 Views)
Main Man
Member Avatar

Manna I'll bet you $100 she responds
Offline Profile Quote Post Rules
 
NoorAnisa
Member Avatar

Main Man
Sep 30 2009, 10:29 AM
NoorAnisa
Sep 30 2009, 10:27 AM
Sorry fella, you are just not worth my effort.
Then why did you reply? Don't go away mad, just fuck off.
Awe shucks now don't go and cry!
Offline Profile Quote Post Rules
 
NoorAnisa
Member Avatar

NoorAnisa
Sep 30 2009, 09:57 AM
Under Sharia law the man is responsible for earning a living. The money a woman earns is hers alone.
Under Sharia law a woman could own property at a time when western women could not inherit anything and was at the good grace of her male children and debated until recent times if a woman even had a soul.

Under Sharia law a woman answers to god just like a man.

Under Sharia law America has surpassed the limits of acceptable warfare and revenge. Under Sharia law America has gravely overstepped boundaries of humanity by the killing we have done with our weapons. Under Sharia law, the truth is in high regard and deceit is wrong and has no "greater good".

You all don't know the half of it. Now for sure not many in Arab lands want full literate Sharia law but see it as a guideline for moderation. It causes one to not kill woman and children in war, for example. Under Sharia law Osama could have been punished but W wanted to go it alone and exclude the proper established channels for extradition.

Under Sharia law, the current banking and insurance systems would be outlawed and have never reached the state we are in now with our economy.

Under Sharia law, cutting off the right hand for steeling was a limit set to stop the killing of thieves. It is not the law to cut off hands... it is the law to do no more than that. It is the limit of punishment, not the dictation of it. Some Wahhabis would disagree and those are the ones the West has aligned with.. the strong arms.. the west loves bullies for allies. It gives an illusion of strength.

Under Sharia law, alcohol is sometimes considered as medicine. Under Sharia law, the woman is responsible for herself and no man has rule over her for choosing a lifestyle or beverage that is looked down upon.

The old stories of who made it to heaven include the drunk who gives water to a thirsty dog. And the religious leader who was disgusted at the dirty dog went to hell for his lack of kindness.

Sharia passes spell check.

Now that woman may live in a place that does not tolerate beer drinking... just like we live in a place that an old woman cannot buy more than two doses of cold medicine without being arrested for having the means to open a meth lab.

Monsanto would be in jail. the ecology, flora and fauna are also under the guardian ship of man to sustain and protect.
as I was saying...
Offline Profile Quote Post Rules
 
Main Man
Member Avatar

Hey manna the raghead cost you a Benjamin. Say thanks. :ROFL:
Offline Profile Quote Post Rules
 
NoorAnisa
Member Avatar

:stomp:

Quote:
 

"We hold these Truths to be self-evident."

The title is of this article is alarming, and accurate. It will brief you on:
· the treaty that manages Iran’s nuclear program,
· the status of compliance with Iran, the US with the UK and now France, and Israel,
· analysis for the disinformation delivered by the US, UK, France, Israel.

The treaty in question: The Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT): The Non-Proliferation Treaty[1] (NPT) was designed to limit nuclear weapon development, facilitate availability of nuclear energy, and lead to global nuclear disarmament. The treaty allows any country to develop nuclear material for energy, receive the assistance of the nuclear countries to do so (US, UK, France, Russia, and China), and then be inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to verify they do not refine fissionable material beyond energy-grade (3-5%) to weapons-grade (over 85%). To date, no NPT country with a nuclear energy program has developed nuclear weapons. Iran and the US are signatories of NPT. Therefore, the legal and Constitutional US response is to help Iran develop nuclear energy.

Status of compliance: You need three brief paragraphs of history to put the present into context: in 1953, the United States CIA, led by one of President Theodore Roosevelt’s grandsons, initiated a coup in Iran (Operation Ajax[2]) to remove the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh. The Iranian government was understandably dissatisfied with the terms of its contract with the Anglo-Persian Oil Company that allowed British interests to claim 85% of the oil profit from Iran.[3] Iran voted to nationalize the oil industry in 1951 after the British declined to renegotiate the terms. The US-led coup was successful, and the royal monarch, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi,[4] became virtual dictator. Fearing popular reprisal, Pahlavi’s government was supported by the CIA in creating the Iranian SAVAK, a vicious secret police for the Shah’s dictatorial government.[5] We can only assume that the oil revenue sharing agreement with the Shah was acceptable to the US and UK.

Under the Eisenhower administration, the US cooperated with the Shah’s government for the development of Iranian nuclear energy through the “Atoms for Peace” program.[6] President Ford agreed to US full cooperation to help Iran build about two dozen nuclear energy plants. When the Iranian people overthrew the Shah’s government in 1979, the US stopped cooperating. The US backed Iraq in their invasion of Iran in 1980 and throughout the war until 1988, seeking a more US-friendly Iranian government. The US provided Saddam Hussein with chemical and biological weapons to use against Iran that the W. Bush administration later used as justification for invading Iraq.[7] Since 1979, the US has worked to prevent Iran having a nuclear energy program, even under the legal provisions of the NPT, and reneged on a multi-billion dollar contract to deliver nuclear fuel to Iran without refunding Iran’s money.[8]

Therefore, all US administrations since Carter in 1979 have committed lies of omission by not disclosing to the public Iran’s treaty-right to nuclear energy under NPT. US political “leadership” obfuscates the issue with rhetoric of Iran’s “nuclear program” to link energy with weapons.[9] Ironically, the US is in additional violation of NPT by developing new nuclear weapons and threatening to use them rather than work for global disarmament as per treaty terms.[10] The US actions are also in violation of the UN Charter in threatening war.[11]

The UK and France are out of NPT compliance by not assisting Iran for nuclear energy development and then accepting the reasonable terms of full monitoring of nuclear refinement that has had a perfect history for safety and compliance for over 40 years. Israel is not signatory to NPT; they ironically choose what they accuse of Iran: a secret nuclear weapons program estimated at 200 warheads. Israel has also been found by the UN’s Human Rights Council to be in numerous violations of War Crimes against Gaza.

The previous three paragraphs are plain vanilla history in conservatively-known content. This means it is encyclopedic and not disputed by government or argued by historians. It should be clear to you that “leadership” from both political parties and mainstream media do not provide the necessary context of history and treaty facts to evaluate the Bush and Obama administrations’ statements threatening war with Iran. Their collective use of the term “nuclear program” is intentionally conflating the two distinct technologies of legal low-grade energy refinement with illegal very high-grade weapons refinement. We could also call it fraud, as it deliberately misinforms.[12]

Iran is in compliance of NPT by having all facilities disclosed and open for IAEA monitoring. On Monday September 21, 2009 Iran disclosed to IAEA per NPT terms of 180 day notification of a new nuclear energy facility that is about 18 months away from operation. For discussion, read here.

Analysis: I’ll give you two paragraphs of recent history, then current analysis. Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, Seymour Hersh, has reported since 2005 that government insiders have disclosed to him that the CIA is presently engaged in covert operations similar to 1953 to overthrow the Iranian government.[13] Hersh, claiming inside White House sources, reported one idea from Vice President Dick Cheney was for the US Navy to build four or five boats that looked like Iranian Naval PT boats, man and arm them with US Navy Seals, then have the Navy Seals attack a US Navy ship off Iran’s coast. The incident would be filmed and used as propaganda to enflame US public opinion for war with Iran.[14] Hersh is the reporter who insiders trusted to report the My Lai Massacre and its cover-up in the Vietnam War, and the Abu Ghraib Torture Scandal in the current Iraq war. Scott Ritter, US former weapons inspector and officer for US Marine Intelligence calls any covert planning and actions by their correct legal name: Acts of War. Ritter states the obvious: the US would never allow Iran to take these actions without calling them Acts of War.[15]

Recently and disturbingly, was the US Air Force admission that they “mistakenly” transported six live nuclear warheads attached to ready-to-launch cruise missiles to the US military base that is the jump-off for US supplies to Middle East Operations. This could be a veiled threat of nuclear war against Iran rather than explained by the long chain of continuous “mistakes” required for such an event to occur.[16] Nuclear weapons are protected by detailed protocol and lethal force; they go nowhere by mistake and had a 50 year perfect record for their handling.

President Obama’s UN speech on Wednesday September 23 was full of lies of omission and commission. He claimed Iran was “in pursuit of nuclear weapons” without proof and all existing reports and IAEA inspections confirming Iran is only in pursuit of their legal right to nuclear energy. Mr. Obama continued: "But if the governments of Iran and North Korea choose to ignore international standards, if they put the pursuit of nuclear weapons ahead of regional stability and the security and opportunity of their own people, if they are oblivious to the dangers of escalating nuclear arms races in both East Asia and the Middle East," he said, adding, "Then they must be held accountable." President Obama then asked the world leaders to demonstrate to Iran and North Korea that international law is not an "empty promise." "We must insist that the future not belong to fear," he said.

President Obama is a lying sack of spin, along with the Republican leadership for their silence in the face of these transparent lies. The US is out of compliance of the international standards of NPT, not Iran. The US and Israel threaten regional stability, security, and opportunity for Iran. The US is unaccountable, holding NPT as an empty promise, and actively instilling fear for the future.

Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon told Reuters: "I think the fact that such brutal thugs, such barbaric dictators like Ahmadinejad, speak in front of the world assembly is a real low point in the annals of the United Nations." Israel’sForeign Minister Avigdor Lieberman claimed "without a doubt" the Islamic Republic is pursuing nuclear weapons, and, "Without wasting time, we must work towards the overthrow of the mad regime of Teheran.”

Secretary of State Clinton piled-on the propaganda, stating Iran must prove their program is peaceful, despite all evidence stating that it is and none suggesting otherwise. President Obama and Secretary of Defense, along with members of Congress, also threatened a military response to Iran. French President Sarkozy: "More uranium enrichment and declarations by the leaders of Iran to wipe a UN member state off the map," he continued, referring to Israel. Sarkozy repeats the lie that Iran threatened Israel.

Iran has responded by demanding proof that they have been deceptive or out of compliance in any way. They also assert that the US, UK, and France are and have been out of compliance with NPT for over 40 years. They did not mention Iran’s replacing the dollar for the Euro as their oil reserve currency that might explain much about the US sharp response.

In conclusion of this analysis, res ipsa loquitur, the facts speak for themselves. The US is attempting to deceive their people through political and media manipulation to believe Orwellian claims exactly opposite from the truth. The UK, France and Israel are accomplices in this criminal deception.

If you wish to continue this history of lies to inflict war upon the innocent, and damn your allegiance to the US Constitution, rule of law, and American values, believe the transparently false rhetoric that bombards us. If you choose to build a brighter future of human cooperation, especially those of you with an oath to defend and protect the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC, then you must tell the simple truth concerning this understandable issue of NPT. Call out lies as lies. Refuse to accept illegal orders of aggression based on known lies; that is the duty of Patriots and the accepted legal conclusion from the Nuremberg Principles: Principle IV states, "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him." Saying one was just following orders is no excuse under the law.

My recommended policy response because of the magnitude of the criminal lies and liars is Truth and Reconciliation.

The following 7-minute video lays out some of the pertinent facts in this analysis. As always, please share this article with all who claim to be responsible citizens. If you appreciate my work, please subscribe by clicking under the article title (it’s free). Feel free to research my library of work, much of which directly pertains to this article’s topic of contrived war in the Middle East.


Quote:
 
Scott Ritter: 'politically motivated hype' over Iran

Former UN Weapons Inspector says United States, Israel creating Iran crisis 'out of nothing'.

NEW YORK - Former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter warned Tuesday against the “politically motivated hype” over Iran’s nuclear program.

"The Obama administration has come to a preordained conclusion that there’s nothing that can be done about Iran’s nuclear program, that Iran either has to get rid of it all, or there’s nothing to discuss about. That’s not much of a discussion," Ritter told Democracy Now!.

"Here we are condemning Iran for doing its job, declaring a facility, inviting inspectors in. And the conclusion it’s reached from this? That they’re producing nuclear weapons," said Ritter.

"This is politically motivated hype designed to create a situation this coming Thursday that will find the United States unable to reach any sort of agreement with Iran about its nuclear program," he added.

Ritter, former UN weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991-1998, is author of Target Iran.

"Even if Iran produces this new facility, which, by the way, is not in operation and won’t be in operation for over a year, no nuclear material has been diverted, there still is a full material balance, and the IAEA is in complete control of the situation. Iran is not in violation," explained Ritter.

"This is much ado about nothing. But again, we come back to the original premise: this is about political hype, the United States hyping up a capability in Iran which doesn’t exist, and that is the capability to produce nuclear weapons," Ritter added.

Ritter explained the vital Iranian need for nuclear energy.

The Iranians "strategically require an additional source of energy, such as nuclear energy" to supplement their domestic energy usage so that they free up their oil production and gas production for exportation, so they can earn money. "This is a big deal. This isn’t insignificant," explained Ritter.

However, Israel and the United States say they want to bomb Iranian nuclear facility, prompting Tehran to react.

"The first thing you do is you build redundancy, and that’s what this new Qom facility represents. It’s redundancy. It’s a backup to the Natanz primary facility. Again, it’s been declared, no nuclear material has been diverted. But it’s there as a backup. The second thing you do is you fire off missiles in a warning that you have an inherent right and capability of self-defense," said Ritter.

Israel has launched a massive air exercise last year, in which it demonstrated the ability to fly hundreds of aircraft the distance necessary to strike targets in Iran.

The United States is also carrying out exercises with Israel.

"The bottom line is it’s the United States and Israel which are the more aggressive of the players here. Iran is not an aggressor. Iran has not attacked anybody. Iran is simply trying to do that which it is legally allowed to do: produce enriched uranium for the purposes of nuclear power," said Ritter.

"It’s Israel, which, by the way, is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, claims it will never be a signatory and has a massive nuclear weapons capability—it’s Israel and the United States which are creating a crisis out of nothing," he added.

http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=34624


Edited by NoorAnisa, Oct 1 2009, 03:27 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Rules
 
NoorAnisa
Member Avatar

And that is why we need stories of strange muslims.. it helps the war effort.
Offline Profile Quote Post Rules
 
Main Man
Member Avatar

Still haven't addressed your religions endorsement :doh:
Offline Profile Quote Post Rules
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4